Pitch perception: A dynamical-systems perspective

Two and a half millennia ago Pythagoras initiated the scientific study of the pitch of sounds; yet our understanding of the mechanisms of pitch perception remains incomplete. Physical models of pitch perception try to explain from elementary principles why certain physical characteristics of the stimulus lead to particular pitch sensations. There are two broad categories of pitch-perception models: place or spectral models consider that pitch is mainly related to the Fourier spectrum of the stimulus, whereas for periodicity or temporal models its characteristics in the time domain are more important. Current models from either class are usually computationally intensive, implementing a series of steps more or less supported by auditory physiology. However, the brain has to analyze and react in real time to an enormous amount of information from the ear and other senses. How is all this information efficiently represented and processed in the nervous system? A proposal of nonlinear and complex systems research is that dynamical attractors may form the basis of neural information processing. Because the auditory system is a complex and highly nonlinear dynamical system, it is natural to suppose that dynamical attractors may carry perceptual and functional meaning. Here we show that this idea, scarcely developed in current pitch models, can be successfully applied to pitch perception.

[1]  R. Patterson,et al.  Residue pitch as a function of component spacing. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  B. L. Cardozo,et al.  Pitch of the Residue , 1962 .

[3]  B. Moore An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1977 .

[4]  W. Yost Pitch of iterated rippled noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Mitchell Steinschneider,et al.  Pitch vs. spectral encoding of harmonic complex tones in primary auditory cortex of the awake monkey , 1998, Brain Research.

[6]  R. Patterson The effects of relative phase and the number of components on residue pitch. , 1973, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Julyan H. E. Cartwright,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics of the Perceived Pitch of Complex Sounds , 1999, chao-dyn/9907002.

[8]  S Grossberg,et al.  A spectral network model of pitch perception. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Julyan H. E. Cartwright,et al.  Universality in three-frequency resonances , 1999 .

[10]  P J Bailey,et al.  Spectral regularity as a factor distinct from harmonic relations in auditory grouping. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Julyan H. E. Cartwright,et al.  A new nonlinear model for pitch perception , 1999 .

[12]  E. de Boer,et al.  On the “Residue” and Auditory Pitch Perception , 1976 .

[13]  Mukarram Ahmad,et al.  Continued fractions , 2019, Quadratic Number Theory.

[14]  O. Piro,et al.  THREE-FREQUENCY RESONANCES IN DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS , 1999, nlin/0007030.

[15]  J. L. Goldstein,et al.  Evidence for a general template in central optimal processing for pitch of complex tones. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  E. Owens,et al.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1997 .

[17]  W M Hartmann,et al.  Pitch, periodicity, and auditory organization. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  T Houtgast,et al.  Subharmonic pitches of a pure tone at low S/N ratio. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[20]  Ray Meddis,et al.  Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computer model of the auditory periphery , 1991 .

[21]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[22]  Kim,et al.  Renormalization of mappings of the two-torus. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[23]  M Hoke,et al.  Tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex: pitch versus frequency representation. , 1989, Science.