Repeatability and internal consistency of abdominal 2D and 4D phase contrast MR flow measurements.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability and internal consistency of flow measurements in the renal arteries and pararenal aorta with the use of standard two-dimensional (2D) and novel four-dimensional (4D) phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten healthy volunteers were imaged with a radially undersampled 4D PC technique centered over the renal arteries and with four 2D PC slices placed in the supra/infrarenal aorta and the left/right renal arteries; this MRI exam was performed twice on each subject. Flow measurements in all four vessels were computed from 2D and 4D PC data sets. Student's t-tests (P < .05) were used to assess differences between in-flow (suprarenal aorta) and out-flow (infrarenal aorta + left renal artery + right renal artery) for the 2D and 4D techniques, to compare in- and out-flow, and to compare repeated measurements of 2D and 4D flow measurements. RESULTS No significant differences were found in repeated measurements of 2D (P = .15) or 4D (P = .39) data. No significant difference was found between 2D (3.4 ± 2.8 mL/cardiac cycle) and 4D (3.5 ± 2.7 mL/cardiac cycle) in- and out-flow differences (P = .88). Out-flow was greater than in-flow for 2D measurements (P = .003); no difference was found for 4D measurements. CONCLUSION The 2D and 4D techniques demonstrated strong repeatability and internal consistency of flow measurements in the renal arteries and pararenal aorta.

[1]  Kevin M Johnson,et al.  Four‐dimensional phase contrast MRI with accelerated dual velocity encoding , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  J. Hennig,et al.  Time‐resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: Improved navigator‐gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  Kevin M Johnson,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of transstenotic pressure gradients in porcine renal artery stenoses by using vastly undersampled phase-contrast MR angiography. , 2011, Radiology.

[4]  Charles A Mistretta,et al.  Transstenotic pressure gradients: measurement in swine--retrospectively ECG-gated 3D phase-contrast MR angiography versus endovascular pressure-sensing guidewires. , 2007, Radiology.

[5]  W. Mali,et al.  Renal blood flow measurements with use of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: normal values and reproducibility. , 2005, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[6]  James G Pipe,et al.  Generation and visualization of four-dimensional MR angiography data using an undersampled 3-D projection trajectory , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[8]  J. Hennig,et al.  Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: Optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  T. Schaeffter,et al.  Four‐dimensional (4D) flow of the whole heart and great vessels using real‐time respiratory self‐gating , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Dimos Poulikakos,et al.  Laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) and 3D phase‐contrast magnetic resonance angiography (PC‐MRA) velocity measurements: Validation in an anatomically accurate cerebral artery aneurysm model with steady flow , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  C. Mistretta,et al.  Velocity Measurements in the Middle Cerebral Arteries of Healthy Volunteers Using 3D Radial Phase-Contrast HYPRFlow: Comparison with Transcranial Doppler Sonography and 2D Phase-Contrast MR Imaging , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[12]  Kevin M Johnson,et al.  Renal arteries: isotropic, high-spatial-resolution, unenhanced MR angiography with three-dimensional radial phase contrast. , 2011, Radiology.

[13]  Michael Markl,et al.  Improved SNR in phase contrast velocimetry with five‐point balanced flow encoding , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Petter Dyverfeldt,et al.  Semi-automatic quantification of 4D left ventricular blood flow , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[15]  Michael Markl,et al.  Time‐resolved three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MRI , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  F. Korosec,et al.  PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[17]  M. Markl,et al.  Comprehensive 4D velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[18]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[19]  Einar Heiberg,et al.  Quantification and visualization of cardiovascular 4D velocity mapping accelerated with parallel imaging or k-t BLAST: head to head comparison and validation at 1.5 T and 3 T , 2011, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[20]  Patrick A Turski,et al.  Improved 3D phase contrast MRI with off‐resonance corrected dual echo VIPR , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.