Determination of optimal parameters for in vivo gene transfer by electroporation, using a rapid in vivo test for cell permeabilization.

In vivo gene transfer to muscle tissue by electroporation can produce long-term, high-level gene expression. In the present study, we report quantitative results on muscle fiber permeabilization using Cr(51)-EDTA as a marker, and we analyze the influence of electric field strength, pulse duration, and pulse number. The comparison of these results to recently published data on gene transfer (Mir et al., P.N.A.S. (USA), 1999), using an identical experimental setup provides the basis for discussing the importance of the level of permeabilization for gene transfer. The threshold for permeabilization was determined by measuring uptake of Cr(51)-EDTA, and DNA transfer was optimal for field strengths just above the threshold for permeabilization. This means that when designing in vivo electric-field-mediated gene transfer protocols for various tissues, determining the threshold for permeabilization using a rapid test such as incorporation of Cr(51)-EDTA, can be used to predict the optimal window for gene transfer.

[1]  Darius Moradpour,et al.  In vivo gene electroinjection and expression in rat liver , 1996, FEBS letters.

[2]  E Neumann,et al.  Control by pulse parameters of electric field-mediated gene transfer in mammalian cells. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[3]  Toshiyuki Matsuzaki,et al.  Direct gene transfer into rat liver cells by in vivo electroporation , 1998, FEBS letters.

[4]  L. Chernomordik,et al.  Electroporation and electrophoretic DNA transfer into cells. The effect of DNA interaction with electropores. , 1992, Biophysical journal.

[5]  E. Neumann,et al.  Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. , 1982, The EMBO journal.

[6]  Leslie Tung,et al.  Electroporation‐mediated gene transfer in cardiac tissue , 1998, FEBS letters.

[7]  J Teissié,et al.  Direct observation in the millisecond time range of fluorescent molecule asymmetrical interaction with the electropermeabilized cell membrane. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[8]  J. Weaver,et al.  Electroporation: A general phenomenon for manipulating cells and tissues , 1993, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[9]  H. Potter,et al.  Electroporation in biology: methods, applications, and instrumentation. , 1988, Analytical biochemistry.

[10]  L. Mir,et al.  Introduction of definite amounts of nonpermeant molecules into living cells after electropermeabilization: direct access to the cytosol. , 1988, Experimental cell research.

[11]  E. Neumann,et al.  Electroporation and Electrofusion in Cell Biology , 1989, Springer US.

[12]  E Neumann,et al.  Calcium-mediated DNA adsorption to yeast cells and kinetics of cell transformation by electroporation. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[13]  M. Rols,et al.  In vivo electrically mediated protein and gene transfer in murine melanoma , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  G. Dickson.  Gene transfer to muscle. , 1996, Biochemical Society transactions.

[15]  T. Tsong,et al.  Electroporation of cell membranes. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[16]  E Neumann,et al.  Mechanism of electroporative dye uptake by mouse B cells. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[17]  H. Aihara,et al.  Gene transfer into muscle by electroporation in vivo , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Raphael C. Lee,et al.  Transient and stable ionic permeabilization of isolated skeletal muscle cells after electrical shock. , 1993, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[19]  J. Kuratsu,et al.  High-efficiency in vivo gene transfer using intraarterial plasmid DNA injection following in vivo electroporation. , 1996, Cancer research.