Within and between systemic country risk. Theory and evidence from the sovereign crisis in Europe

We propose a hierarchical Marshall–Olkin model of countrywide systemic risk. At the lower level, we model the systemic risk of a crisis within the banking system (that we call “within” systemic risk) and at the higher level we model the probability of a joint default of the banking system and the public sector (that we call “between” systemic risk). We apply the model to four countries of Northern Europe and four of Southern Europe. In Northern Europe, Germany ranks third for soundness of the banking system but first for country safety. The opposite findings are obtained for Netherlands. In Southern Europe, the Italian banking system ranks first for soundness, quite above Spain, while Italy is aligned with Spain for countrywide risk. Differences in default time correlations between the banking and the public sectors explain these findings.

[1]  C. Genest,et al.  Statistical Inference Procedures for Bivariate Archimedean Copulas , 1993 .

[2]  Markus K. Brunnermeier Deciphering the Liquidity and Credit Crunch 2007-08 , 2008 .

[3]  Franklin Allen,et al.  Financial Contagion , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Jan-Frederik Mai,et al.  Moment-based estimation of extendible Marshall-Olkin copulas , 2012 .

[5]  S. Battiston,et al.  Liaisons Dangereuses: Increasing Connectivity, Risk Sharing, and Systemic Risk , 2009 .

[6]  Fabrizio Durante,et al.  On the construction of multivariate extreme value models via copulas , 2009 .

[7]  D. Gray,et al.  Measuring and Analyzing Sovereign Risk with Contingent Claims , 2005, World Scientific Reference on Contingent Claims Analysis in Corporate Finance.

[8]  Charles Goodhart,et al.  Banking Stability Measures , 2009 .

[9]  S. Mittnik,et al.  Estimating a Banking-Macro Model for Europe Using a Multi-Regime VAR , 2012 .

[10]  Basic Insights in Pricing Basket Credit Derivatives , 2002 .

[11]  Umberto Cherubini,et al.  Marking-to-market government guarantees to financial systems – Theory and evidence for Europe , 2013 .

[12]  R. C. Merton,et al.  A New Framework for Analyzing and Managing Macrofinancial Risks of an Economy , 2006 .

[13]  James D. Hamilton,et al.  On the Limitations of Government Borrowing: a Framework for Empirical Testing , 1985 .

[14]  J. Ejsing,et al.  The Janus-Headed Salvation: Sovereign and Bank Credit Risk Premia during 2008-09 , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[15]  M. Cropper,et al.  Sulfur Dioxide Control by Electric Utilities: What Are the Gains from Trade? , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Kenneth J. Singleton,et al.  Credit Risk: Pricing, Measurement, and Management , 2003 .

[17]  CDS-implied EDF ™ Credit Measures and Fair-value Spreads , 2010 .

[18]  Martin Wieland,et al.  The impact of sovereign credit risk on bank funding conditions , 2011 .

[19]  Jan-Frederik Mai,et al.  Lévy-frailty copulas , 2009, J. Multivar. Anal..

[20]  M. King,et al.  An Assessment of Financial Sector Rescue Programmes , 2009 .

[21]  Fabrizio Durante,et al.  Multivariate Hierarchical Copulas with Shocks , 2010 .

[22]  Carles M. Cuadras,et al.  A continuous general multivariate distribution and its properties , 1981 .

[23]  Bill Ravens,et al.  An Introduction to Copulas , 2000, Technometrics.

[24]  A. Lo,et al.  Econometric Measures of Systemic Risk in the Finance and Insurance Sectors , 2010 .

[25]  Antje Berndt,et al.  Decomposing European CDS Returns , 2010 .

[26]  K. Singleton,et al.  How Sovereign is Sovereign Credit Risk? , 2007 .

[27]  H. Block Multivariate Exponential Distribution , 2006 .

[28]  Markus K. Brunnermeier,et al.  Market Liquidity and Funding Liquidity , 2005 .

[29]  I. Olkin,et al.  A Multivariate Exponential Distribution , 1967 .