Describing the distribution of engagement in an Internet support group by post frequency: A comparison of the 90-9-1 Principle and Zipf's Law

Abstract Sustainable online peer-to-peer support groups require engaged members. A metric commonly used to identify these members is the number of posts they have made. The 90-9-1 principle has been proposed as a ‘rule of thumb' for classifying members using this metric with a recent study demonstrating the applicability of the principal to digital health social networks. Using data from a depression Internet support group, the current study sought to replicate this finding and to investigate in more detail the model of best fit for classifying participant contributions. Our findings replicate previous results and also find the fit of a power curve (Zipf distribution) to account for 98.6% of the variance. The Zipf distribution provides a more nuanced image of the data and may have practical application in assessing the ‘coherence' of the sample.

[1]  Colleen Young,et al.  Community Management That Works: How to Build and Sustain a Thriving Online Health Community , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[2]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Zipf's law and the Internet , 2002, Glottometrics.

[3]  T. Mierlo Superusers in Social Networks for Smoking Cessation: Analysis of Demographic Characteristics and Posting Behavior From the Canadian Cancer Society's Smokers' Helpline Online and StopSmokingCenter.net , 2012 .

[4]  Trevor van Mierlo,et al.  Superusers in Social Networks for Smoking Cessation: Analysis of Demographic Characteristics and Posting Behavior From the Canadian Cancer Society's Smokers' Helpline Online and StopSmokingCenter.net , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Michael Batty,et al.  There is More than a Power Law in Zipf , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[7]  T. Mierlo The 1% Rule in Four Digital Health Social Networks: An Observational Study , 2014 .

[8]  Nathan K. Cobb,et al.  Social network structure of a large online community for smoking cessation. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[9]  X. Gabaix Zipf's Law for Cities: An Explanation , 1999 .

[10]  M. E. J. Newman,et al.  Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[11]  Kathleen M Griffiths,et al.  Systematic Review on Internet Support Groups (ISGs) and Depression (1): Do ISGs Reduce Depressive Symptoms? , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[12]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Health and Illness in a Connected World: How Might Sharing Experiences on the Internet Affect People's Health? , 2012, The Milbank quarterly.

[13]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Identifying sets of key players in a social network , 2006, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[14]  J. Powell,et al.  Primary care Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups : systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions , 2004 .

[15]  G. Bogat,et al.  Mutual help goes on‐line , 1997 .

[16]  George A. Miller,et al.  Length-Frequency Statistics for Written English , 1958, Inf. Control..

[17]  Ray Jones,et al.  Using Metrics to Describe the Participative Stances of Members Within Discussion Forums , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.