Comparison of an island wind turbine collective and individual pitch LQG controllers designed to alleviate fatigue loads

This study aims to analyse different linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) controllers' performances in terms of reducing the fatigue load of wind turbines' (WT) most costly components caused by the spatial turbulence of wind speed. Five LQGs with increasing control model complexity and a greater number of objectives are designed, the first four with collective pitch control (CPC), and the fifth with individual pitch control (IPC). In the design of the controllers, firstly a linear control model is obtained in the operating point corresponding to a wind speed of 18 m/s. Then, the Kalman filter (KF) and the rest of the controller are tuned with simulations in order to obtain the lowest possible fatigue loads while respecting certain generator power and speed variation limits. Finally, the five controllers are tested with processor-in-the-loop (PIL). Fatigue loads are evaluated by rainflow counting algorithm and then applying the Palmgren'Miner rule. Tests results show that drive-train loads are significantly reduced from LQG1_CPC, that the complexity of the controllers does not have a significant influence on the reduction of tower loads, and that LQG3_IPC allows fatigue loads on blades to be alleviated considerably.

[1]  G.A.M. van Kuik,et al.  Review of state of the art in smart rotor control research for wind turbines , 2010 .

[2]  W.E. Leithead,et al.  A novel approach to structural load control using intelligent actuators , 2009, 2009 17th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation.

[3]  Karl Stol,et al.  Individual blade pitch control of floating offshore wind turbines , 2010 .

[4]  R. Briand,et al.  Alleviation of Wind Turbines Loads with a LQG Controller associated to Intelligent Micro Sensors , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology.

[5]  S. Bacha,et al.  Energy-Reliability Optimization of Wind Energy Conversion Systems by Sliding Mode Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[6]  F D Kanellos,et al.  Optimal Control of Variable Speed Wind Turbines in Islanded Mode of Operation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[7]  I. Rychlik A new definition of the rainflow cycle counting method , 1987 .

[8]  Tomonobu Senjyu,et al.  Stochastic inequality constrained closed-loop model-based predictive control of MW-class wind generating system in the electric power supply , 2010 .

[9]  Peter Tavner,et al.  Reliability of wind turbine subassemblies , 2009 .

[10]  N. Peric,et al.  Individual pitch control of wind turbine based on loads estimation , 2008, 2008 34th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics.

[11]  Ervin Bossanyi,et al.  Individual Blade Pitch Control for Load Reduction , 2003 .

[12]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Feedback–feedforward individual pitch control for wind turbine load reduction , 2009 .

[13]  G. Ramtharan,et al.  The importance of control in wind turbine design and loading , 2009, 2009 17th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation.