LQG framework explains performance of balancing inverted pendulum with incongruent visual feedback

Successful manipulation of objects requires forming internal representations of the object dynamics. To do so, the sensorimotor system uses visual feedback of the object movement allowing us to estimate the object state and build the representation. One way to investigate this mechanism is by introducing a discrepancy between the visual feedback about the object’s movement and the actual movement. This causes a decline in the ability to accurately control the object, shedding light about possible factors influencing the performance. In this study, we show that an optimal feedback control framework can account for the performance and kinematic characteristics of balancing an inverted pendulum when visual feedback of pendulum tip did not represent the actual pendulum tip. Our model suggests a possible mechanism for the role of visual feedback on forming internal representation of objects’ dynamics.

[1]  Peter J. Gawthrop,et al.  Human stick balancing: an intermittent control explanation , 2013, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  Peter J. Gawthrop,et al.  Intermittent control: a computational theory of human control , 2011, Biological Cybernetics.

[3]  Raz Leib,et al.  Minimum acceleration with constraints of center of mass: a unified model for arm movements and object manipulation. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Specificity of Reflex Adaptation for Task-Relevant Variability , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Christopher D Mah,et al.  Manipulating objects with internal degrees of freedom: evidence for model-based control. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Sae Franklin,et al.  Influence of Visual Feedback on the Sensorimotor Control of an Inverted Pendulum , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[7]  M. Kawato,et al.  Visual Feedback Is Not Necessary for the Learning of Novel Dynamics , 2007, PloS one.

[8]  Daniel A. Braun,et al.  Optimal Control Predicts Human Performance on Objects with Internal Degrees of Freedom , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  Sae Franklin,et al.  A Simulated Inverted Pendulum to Investigate Human Sensorimotor Control , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[10]  John Milton,et al.  Sensory uncertainty and stick balancing at the fingertip , 2014, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  E. Brenner,et al.  Fast corrections of movements with a computer mouse. , 2003, Spatial vision.

[13]  Ilana Nisky,et al.  State-Based Delay Representation and Its Transfer from a Game of Pong to Reaching and Tracking , 2017, eNeuro.

[14]  Francisco J. Valero Cuevas,et al.  Slower Visuomotor Corrections with Unchanged Latency are Consistent with Optimal Adaptation to Increased Endogenous Noise in the Elderly , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..