Expanding biodegradable polymer resin use: Assessing the aggregate impact on the US economy

Abstract This paper assesses the aggregate impact of the substitution of cornstarch-based biodegradable polymer resins for petroleum-based plastic materials and resins on the US economy. The analytical approach used consists of a computable general equilibrium model composed of 14 producing sectors, 14 consuming sectors, 6 household categories classified by income, and a government. The results suggest that for a $1.00 /lb of resin subsidy, the substitution of cornstarch-based biodegradable polymer resins for petroleum-based plastic materials and resins will result in an increase in output by all producing sectors of 0.067% or about $542 million, a rise in the consumption of goods and services of about 0.003% or $110 million, a rise in total utility of 0.004% or $168 million, and a net increase in government expenditures of 0.047% or $369 million. The agricultural sectors would be affected. For example, with a subsidy to promote the substitution of cornstarch-based biodegradable polymer resins for petroleum-based plastic materials and resins, output in the program crops sector (primarily corn) will expand (by about $431 million), output in the livestock sector will increase (by about $27 million), and output in all other agriculture commodities sectors will be increased (by about $192 million). When a larger subsidy of a $3.50 /lb for the production of cornstarch-based biodegradable polymer resins is considered, the effects are comparable to the $1.00/lb subsidy case. The differences between the impacts of the two subsidies are primarily with regard to the order of magnitude of the changes in the equilibrium values of the prices and quantities.

[1]  Noel D. Uri,et al.  The impact of technical change on the aggregate production function , 1984 .

[2]  C. L. Swanson,et al.  Emerging polymeric materials based on starch , 1992 .

[3]  Bruce A. McCarl,et al.  Assessing Economic Implications of New Technology: The Case of Cornstarch-Based Biodegradable Plastic , 1992 .

[4]  Arnold C. Harberger The Incidence of the Corporation Income Tax , 1962, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  U.S. Energy Policy and Economic Growth, 1975-2000 , 1974 .

[6]  Noel D. Uri,et al.  The effect of farming practices on reducing excess nitrogen fertilizer use , 1993 .

[7]  L. Mathiesen Computation of economic equilibria by a sequence of linear complementarity problems , 1985 .

[8]  K. Arrow,et al.  Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency , 1961 .

[9]  Herbert E. Scarf,et al.  The Approximation of Fixed Points of a Continuous Mapping , 1967 .

[10]  J. Shoven,et al.  Applying general equilibrium , 1993 .

[11]  John Whalley,et al.  A general equilibrium calculation of the effects of differential taxation of income from capital in the U.S. , 1972 .

[12]  Marinos Tsigas,et al.  Tax Policy and U.S. Agriculture: A General Equilibrium Analysis , 1988 .

[13]  Arnold C. Harberger Taxation and Welfare , 1974 .

[14]  Earl O. Heady,et al.  Agricultural Production Functions. , 1962 .

[15]  Lars Mathiesen,et al.  Computational Experience in Solving Equilibrium Models by a Sequence of Linear Complementarity Problems , 1985, Oper. Res..

[16]  John Whalley,et al.  A General Equilibrium Model for Tax Policy Evaluation , 1985 .