Reasons for Re-Excision After Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: Insight from the American Society of Breast Surgeons MasterySM Database

[1]  F. Vicini,et al.  Trends in breast cancer treatment in United States from 2000 to 2011: Consequences of 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines change. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Seema A Khan,et al.  Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Seema A. Khan,et al.  Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stages I and II Invasive Breast Cancer , 2014, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[4]  P. Macaskill,et al.  The Association of Surgical Margins and Local Recurrence in Women with Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Meta-Analysis , 2014, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[5]  L. Kux.  OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration , 2014 .

[6]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  A. Degnim,et al.  Should Re-excision Lumpectomy Rates Be a Quality Measure in Breast-Conserving Surgery? , 2013, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[8]  J. Quincy Brown,et al.  Optical Spectral Surveillance of Breast Tissue Landscapes for Detection of Residual Disease in Breast Tumor Margins , 2013, PloS one.

[9]  Edi Brogi,et al.  Impact of Margin Assessment Method on Positive Margin Rate and Total Volume Excised , 2013, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  Lee G. Wilke,et al.  Intraoperative Imprint Cytology and Frozen Section Pathology for Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery: A Systematic Review , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  S. Mclaughlin,et al.  Breast Surgery Outcomes as Quality Measures According to the NSQIP Database , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[12]  M. Trivella,et al.  Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  M. Morrow,et al.  The challenge of developing quality measures for breast cancer surgery. , 2012, JAMA.

[14]  H. Feigelson,et al.  Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. , 2012, JAMA.

[15]  A. Arriaga,et al.  Postgame analysis: using video-based coaching for continuous professional development. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[16]  Nabil Wasif,et al.  Radioactive Seed Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: Review of 1,000 Consecutive Procedures at a Single Institution , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[17]  Julliette M. Buckley,et al.  Lumpectomy Cavity Shaved Margins Do Not Impact Re-excision Rates in Breast Cancer Patients , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[18]  B. Geller,et al.  Variability in the Quality of Pathology Reporting of Margin Status Following Breast Cancer Surgery , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[19]  C. Kaufman,et al.  Can We Measure the Quality of Breast Surgical Care? , 2011, Annals of surgical oncology.

[20]  Judy C. Boughey,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Routine Frozen-Section Analysis of Breast Margins Compared with Reoperation for Positive Margins , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[21]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  The Safety of Multiple Re-excisions after Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[22]  Les Irwig,et al.  Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[23]  J. Boughey,et al.  Early Results from a Novel Quality Outcomes Program: The American Society of Breast Surgeons’ Mastery of Breast Surgery , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[24]  L Biganzoli,et al.  Quality indicators in breast cancer care. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[25]  L. Tafra,et al.  The relationship between quality and cost during the perioperative breast cancer episode of care. , 2010, Breast.

[26]  J. Landercasper,et al.  Perioperative quality metrics for one step breast cancer surgery: A patient‐centered approach , 2010, Journal of surgical oncology.

[27]  C. Laronga,et al.  Attaining Negative Margins in Breast-Conservation Operations: Is There a Consensus among Breast Surgeons? , 2010 .

[28]  Reshma Jagsi,et al.  What is an Adequate Margin for Breast-Conserving Surgery? Surgeon Attitudes and Correlates , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[29]  R. Pleijhuis,et al.  Obtaining Adequate Surgical Margins in Breast-Conserving Therapy for Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Current Modalities and Future Directions , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[30]  M. Morrow,et al.  Effect of margin status on local recurrence after breast conservation and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  J. Niland,et al.  Selecting High Priority Quality Measures For Breast Cancer Quality Improvement , 2008, Medical care.

[32]  D. Berwick,et al.  The triple aim: care, health, and cost. , 2008, Health affairs.

[33]  Saveli Goldberg,et al.  Current Perceptions Regarding Surgical Margin Status After Breast-Conserving Therapy: Results of a Survey , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[34]  Leonard L. Berry,et al.  Discovering the Soul of Service: The Nine Drivers of Sustainable Business Success , 1999 .