The relative contribution of noise and adaptation to competition during tri-stable motion perception.

Animals exploit antagonistic interactions for sensory processing and these can cause oscillations between competing states. Ambiguous sensory inputs yield such perceptual multistability. Despite numerous empirical studies using binocular rivalry or plaid pattern motion, the driving mechanisms behind the spontaneous transitions between alternatives remain unclear. In the current work, we used a tristable barber pole motion stimulus combining empirical and modeling approaches to elucidate the contributions of noise and adaptation to underlying competition. We first robustly characterized the coupling between perceptual reports of transitions and continuously recorded eye direction, identifying a critical window of 480 ms before button presses, within which both measures were most strongly correlated. Second, we identified a novel nonmonotonic relationship between stimulus contrast and average perceptual switching rate with an initially rising rate before a gentle reduction at higher contrasts. A neural fields model of the underlying dynamics introduced in previous theoretical work and incorporating noise and adaptation mechanisms was adapted, extended, and empirically validated. Noise and adaptation contributions were confirmed to dominate at the lower and higher contrasts, respectively. Model simulations, with two free parameters controlling adaptation dynamics and direction thresholds, captured the measured mean transition rates for participants. We verified the shift from noise-dominated toward adaptation-driven in both the eye direction distributions and intertransition duration statistics. This work combines modeling and empirical evidence to demonstrate the signal-strength-dependent interplay between noise and adaptation during tristability. We propose that the findings generalize beyond the barber pole stimulus case to ambiguous perception in continuous feature spaces.

[1]  M. Carandini,et al.  Normalization as a canonical neural computation , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  R A Andersen,et al.  Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  Nava Rubin,et al.  Dynamical characteristics common to neuronal competition models. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Kung Yao,et al.  Perceptual dominance time distributions in multistable visual perception , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  S. Amari Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fields , 1977, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  Guillaume S. Masson,et al.  Dynamics of distributed 1D and 2D motion representations for short-latency ocular following , 2008, Vision Research.

[7]  Y. Kuznetsov Elements of applied bifurcation theory (2nd ed.) , 1998 .

[8]  K. Naka,et al.  S‐potentials from luminosity units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae) , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  G. Sperling,et al.  Two mechanisms that determine the Barber-Pole Illusion , 2015, Vision Research.

[10]  N. Price,et al.  Motion perception correlates with volitional but not reflexive eye movements , 2014, Neuroscience.

[11]  Hans Wallach Über visuell wahrgenommene Bewegungsrichtung , 1935 .

[12]  Philipp Berens,et al.  CircStat: AMATLABToolbox for Circular Statistics , 2009, Journal of Statistical Software.

[13]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Different motion sensitive units are involved in recovering the direction of moving lines , 1993, Vision Research.

[14]  S. R. Lehky Binocular rivalry is not chaotic , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Background Synaptic Activity as a Switch Between Dynamical States in a Network , 2003, Neural Computation.

[16]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[17]  Guillaume S. Masson,et al.  Dynamic resolution of ambiguity during tri-stable motion perception , 2015, Vision Research.

[18]  Guillaume S Masson,et al.  Temporal dynamics of 2D motion integration for ocular following in macaque monkeys. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  The influence of terminators on motion integration across space , 1992, Vision Research.

[20]  Guillaume S. Masson,et al.  The behavioral receptive field underlying motion integration for primate tracking eye movements , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[21]  Nava Rubin,et al.  Balance between noise and adaptation in competition models of perceptual bistability , 2009, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[22]  Manabu Tanifuji,et al.  Which image is in awareness during binocular rivalry? Reading perceptual status from eye movements. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[23]  George Sperling,et al.  A moving-barber-pole illusion. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[24]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  A Spiking Neuron Model for Binocular Rivalry , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[26]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Cortical Microcircuit Dynamics Mediating Binocular Rivalry: the Role of Adaptation in Inhibition , 2022 .

[27]  Guillaume S Masson,et al.  Looking for symmetry: fixational eye movements are biased by image mirror symmetry. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Kiyotoshi Matsuoka,et al.  Sustained oscillations generated by mutually inhibiting neurons with adaptation , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[29]  G. Wallis,et al.  The dynamics of perceptual rivalry in bistable and tristable perception. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[30]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Bifurcation study of a neural field competition model with an application to perceptual switching in motion integration , 2013, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[31]  E Castet,et al.  Long-range interactions in the spatial integration of motion signals. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[32]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention , 2003, Vision Research.

[33]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Integration of Contour and Terminator Signals in Visual Area MT of Alert Macaque , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  John Rinzel,et al.  Noise and adaptation in multistable perception: noise drives when to switch, adaptation determines percept choice. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[35]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[36]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  AIC model selection using Akaike weights , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Organization of Binocular Pathways: Modeling and Data Related to Rivalry , 1991, Neural Computation.

[38]  Daniel Pressnitzer,et al.  The initial phase of auditory and visual scene analysis , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Bifurcation analysis applied to a model of motion integration with a multistable stimulus , 2012, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[40]  P. Kornprobst,et al.  Modelling the dynamics of motion integration with a new luminance-gated diffusion mechanism , 2010, Vision Research.

[41]  K. Sondhi Dynamics of pattern formation , 2004, Genetica.

[42]  H. Akaike Likelihood of a model and information criteria , 1981 .

[43]  Thomas D. Albright,et al.  The interpretation of visual motion: Evidence for surface segmentation mechanisms , 1996, Vision Research.

[44]  S. R. Lehky An Astable Multivibrator Model of Binocular Rivalry , 1988, Perception.

[45]  R. Andersen,et al.  Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. II. Physiology , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[46]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: alternating views of reversible figures. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Construction and evaluation of an integrated dynamical model of visual motion perception , 2015, Neural Networks.

[48]  Nava Rubin,et al.  The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids , 2003, Vision Research.

[49]  E. Adelson,et al.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns , 1982, Nature.

[50]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Seeing multiple directions of motion—physiology and psychophysics , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[52]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  A. Montagnini,et al.  Do we track what we see? Common versus independent processing for motion perception and smooth pursuit eye movements: A review , 2011, Vision Research.

[54]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  A model of binocular rivalry based on competition in IT , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[55]  E. Castet,et al.  Temporal dynamics of motion integration for the initiation of tracking eye movements at ultra-short latencies , 2000, Visual Neuroscience.

[56]  Alan W Freeman,et al.  Multistage model for binocular rivalry. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[57]  W. Levelt The alternation process in binocular rivalry , 1966 .

[58]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Eye movements elicited by transparent stimuli , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[59]  Christian Quaia,et al.  A Motion-from-Form Mechanism Contributes to Extracting Pattern Motion from Plaids , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  Eric Castet,et al.  The extrinsic/intrinsic classification of two-dimensional motion signals with barber-pole stimuli , 1999, Vision Research.

[61]  Wolfgang Einhäuser,et al.  Tri-stable stimuli reveal interactions among subsequent percepts: Rivalry is biased by perceptual history , 2010, Vision Research.

[62]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Binocular motion rivalry in macaque monkeys: Eye dominance and tracking eye movements , 1990, Vision Research.

[63]  Hannah E Smithson,et al.  Compatible and incompatible representations in visual sensory storage. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[64]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The aperture problem—II. Spatial integration of velocity information along contours , 1988, Vision Research.

[65]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Temporal dynamics of a neural solution to the aperture problem in visual area MT of macaque brain , 2001, Nature.

[66]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion , 1989, Vision Research.

[67]  K. Matsuoka The dynamic model of binocular rivalry , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[68]  Stephen G Lisberger,et al.  Visual Guidance of Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements: Sensation, Action, and What Happens in Between , 2010, Neuron.

[69]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  Role of mutual inhibition in binocular rivalry. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[70]  J. Cowan,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. , 1972, Biophysical journal.

[71]  Robert S Allison,et al.  The dichoptiscope: an instrument for investigating cues to motion in depth. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[72]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey , 1990, Vision Research.

[73]  S. Wuerger,et al.  Perception of Moving Lines: Interactions Between Local Perpendicular Signals and 2D Motion Signals , 1997, Vision Research.

[74]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[75]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.