Echo strength and density structure of Hawaiian mesopelagic boundary community patches.

A broadband sonar system and digital camera with strobe lights were mounted on a vertically profiling frame with a depth sensor. The echo strengths and densities of animals within individual mesopelagic boundary community patches were investigated as a function of depth. Time and distance from shore were also investigated. Simultaneous surface echosounder surveys permitted comparison of density estimates from two techniques. Echo strength values suggest nearshore boundary community animals are primarily myctophid fishes, which was confirmed by preliminary photographic evidence. Echo strength varied significantly as a function of distance from the shoreline and time. These measures of echo strength are important for estimating density from a surface echosounder. Density estimates from these revised echo strengths compare well with those made with echo highlight counting, which is independent of echo strength. These density measures suggest that previous density estimates were too low but do not change the conclusions of these studies. Vertical microstructure in density was apparent but animal size and compositional structure was not evident within a patch. Patch edges were abrupt, with no differences in the density or echo strength from patch interiors. These edges were generally straight, with a sharp drop in density to the background density of zero. Estimates of animal size as a function of time provide information about the diel migration patterns of these mesopelagic animals.

[1]  R. Crawford,et al.  Quantitative Studies of Arctic Cod ( Boreogadus saida ) Schools: Important Energy Stores in the Arctic Food Web , 1996 .

[2]  J. Ares,et al.  Sex-related spatial patterns of Poa ligularis in relation to shrub patch occurrence in northern Patagonia , 2000 .

[3]  M. Gross,et al.  The evolution of male and female parental care in fishes , 1985 .

[4]  M. Nakaoka,et al.  Magnitude of within-patch variation in seagrass Halophila ovalis growth affected by adjacent Thalassia hemprichii vegetation , 2000, Ecological Research.

[5]  Whitlow W. L. Au,et al.  Target strength measurements of Hawaiian mesopelagic boundary community animals , 2001 .

[6]  W. Au,et al.  Energy: converting from acoustic to biological resource units. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Villy Christensen,et al.  Representing Density Dependent Consequences of Life History Strategies in Aquatic Ecosystems: EcoSim II , 2000, Ecosystems.

[8]  D. Cowles Swimming Speed and Metabolic Rate during Routine Swimming and Simulated Diel Vertical Migration of Sergestes similis in the Laboratory , 2001 .

[9]  I. Gordon,et al.  The influence of vegetation pattern on the grazing of heather moorland by red deer and sheep. II: The impact on heather , 1995 .

[10]  L. V. M. Traykovski,et al.  Effect of orientation on broadband acoustic scattering of Antarctic krill Euphausia superba: Implications for inverting zooplankton spectral acoustic signatures for angle of orientation , 1998 .

[11]  R. D. Howard THE EVOLUTION OF MATING STRATEGIES IN BULLFROGS, RANA CATESBEIANA , 1978, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  W. Au,et al.  Fine‐scale diel migration dynamics of an island‐associated sound‐scattering layer , 2002 .

[13]  J. Hirota,et al.  Mesopelagic-boundary community in Hawaii: Micronekton at the interface between neritic and oceanic ecosystems , 1991 .

[14]  P. Wiebe,et al.  Acoustic Visualization of Patch Dynamics in Oceanic Ecosystems , 1994 .

[15]  W. L. Romey Position preferences within groups: do whirligigs select positions which balance feeding opportunities with predator avoidance? , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  K. Iida,et al.  Studies on Acoustic Target Strength of Squid:III. Measurement of the mean target strength of small live squid , 1989 .

[17]  J. L. Dooley,et al.  Predation hazard and seed removal by small mammals: microhabitat versus patch scale effects , 1993, Oecologia.

[18]  V. C. Sambilay,et al.  Interrelationships between swimming speed, caudal fin aspect ratio and body length of fishes , 1990 .

[19]  R. Cocroft Antipredator defense as a limited resource: unequal predation risk in broods of an insect with maternal care , 2002 .

[20]  R. Barr,et al.  A design study of an acoustic system suitable for differentiating between orange roughy and other New Zealand deep-water species , 2001 .

[21]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  W. Au,et al.  Acoustic backscattering by Hawaiian lutjanid snappers. II. Broadband temporal and spectral structure. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  W. Au,et al.  Spatial dynamics of a nearshore, micronekton sound-scattering layer , 2003 .

[24]  E. Brigham,et al.  The fast Fourier transform and its applications , 1988 .

[25]  W. Au,et al.  Prey dynamics affect foraging by a pelagic predator (Stenella longirostris) over a range of spatial and temporal scales , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[26]  W. Au,et al.  Diel horizontal migration of the Hawaiian mesopelagic boundary community observed acoustically , 2001 .

[27]  J. M. Black,et al.  Foraging dynamics in goose flocks: the cost of living on the edge , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  Kelly J Benoit-Bird,et al.  Acoustic backscattering by Hawaiian lutjanid snappers. 1. Target strength and swimbladder characteristics. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Dwayne W. Meadows CENTRE-EDGE DIFFERENCES IN BEHAVIOUR, TERRITORY SIZE AND FITNESS IN CLUSTERS OF TERRITORIAL DAMSELFISH: PATTERNS, CAUSES, AND CONSEQUENCES , 2001 .

[30]  Whitlow W. L. Au,et al.  Diel migration dynamics of an island-associated sound-scattering layer , 2004 .

[31]  R. Hughes,et al.  ENERGY MAXIMIZATION IN THE DIET OF THE SHORE CRAB, CARCINUS MAENAS , 1978 .