The Dual Role of Trust in System Use

Many studies have shown that trust is an important cognition that drives the continued use of information systems. The theoretical reasoning behind this effect has been that trust helps people rule out undesirable, yet possible, opportunistic behaviors, and ultimately makes users more at ease regarding transacting with a website. In this study, we build on the relationship marketing literature and argue that trust may have an even broader role in post-adoption contexts than previously assumed. Not only can trust influence system use intentions directly (a dedication mechanism), but also indirectly through the promotion of social investment in a relationship with a system and its users. This social investment represents a procedural-relational switching cost (a constraint mechanism) which further increases continuance intent. Data collected from 382 social networking website users support the hypotheses and validate the proposed dual-role of trust. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

[1]  Sumeet Gupta,et al.  Investigating the intention to purchase digital items in social networking communities: A customer value perspective , 2011, Inf. Manag..

[2]  Nick Bontis,et al.  User acceptance of wireless short messaging services: Deconstructing perceived value , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Edward Shih-Tse Wang,et al.  Suppliers' willingness of customization, effective communication, and trust: a study of switching cost antecedents , 2011 .

[4]  E. P. Michael.  Strategy and the Internet. , 2001 .

[5]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principal-Agent Perspective , 2007, MIS Q..

[6]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  User acceptance of hedonic digital artifacts: A theory of consumption values perspective , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[7]  Joseph P. Cannon,et al.  An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer–Seller Relationships: , 1997 .

[8]  Deb Sledgianowski,et al.  Using Social Network Sites: The Effects of Playfulness, Critical Mass and Trust in a Hedonic Context , 2009, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Admnistrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .

[10]  K. Gwinner,et al.  The antecedent role of customer-to-employee relationships in the development of customer-to-firm relationships , 2010 .

[11]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Special Issue: Trust in Online Environments , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Straub,et al.  Editor's Comments: An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Administrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .

[13]  Zhilin Yang,et al.  Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: The role of switching costs , 2004 .

[14]  D. Gefen,et al.  E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust , 2000 .

[15]  Ana M. Martínez-Alemán,et al.  Online Social Networking on Campus: Understanding What Matters in Student Culture , 2008 .

[16]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[18]  Judy K. Frels,et al.  Consumer switching costs: A typology, antecedents, and consequences , 2003 .

[19]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[21]  P. Klemperer.  Markets with consumer switching costs , 1986 .

[22]  Sung S. Kim,et al.  Out of Dedication or Constraint? A Dual Model of Post-Adoption Phenomena and its Empirical Test in the Context of Online Services , 2009, MIS Q..

[23]  C. Ranganathan,et al.  Switching behavior of mobile users: do users' relational investments and demographics matter? , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[25]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: a status quo bias perspective , 2009 .

[26]  Ruben Chumpitaz Cáceres,et al.  Service quality, relationship satisfaction, trust, commitment and business‐to‐business loyalty , 2007 .

[27]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[28]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[29]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  The influence of extro/introversion on the intention to pay for social networking sites , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[30]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  The benefits and dangers of enjoyment with social networking websites , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Psychological Contract Violation in Online Marketplaces: Antecedents, Consequences, and Moderating Role , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  David L. Mothersbaugh,et al.  Why customers stay: measuring the underlying dimensions of services switching costs and managing their differential strategic outcomes , 2002 .

[33]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Migration to Open-Standard Interorganizational Systems: Network Effects, Switching Costs, and Path Dependency , 2005, MIS Q..

[34]  L. Berry,et al.  Customers' motivations for maintaining relationships with service providers , 1997 .

[35]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  Antecedents of Use-Continuance in Information Systems: Toward an Inegrative View , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Hui-Ju Chen,et al.  A study of the impacts of website quality on customer relationship performance , 2009 .

[37]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Online Consumer Trust and Live Help Interfaces: The Effects of Text-to-Speech Voice and Three-Dimensional Avatars , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[38]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Trust-Assuring Arguments in B2C E-commerce: Impact of Content, Source, and Price on Trust , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[40]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[41]  Catherine E. Connelly,et al.  In Justice We Trust: Predicting User Acceptance of E-Customer Services , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  David Gefen,et al.  If you spoke as she does, sir, instead of the way you do: a sociolinguistics perspective of gender differences in virtual communities , 2005, DATB.

[43]  Heesup Han,et al.  Influencing factors on restaurant customers' revisit intention: the roles of emotions and switching barriers. , 2009 .

[44]  G. Stewart.  A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationships Between Team Design Features and Team Performance , 2006 .

[45]  P. Aurier,et al.  The differing and mediating roles of trust and relationship commitment in service relationship maintenance and development , 2010 .

[46]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage , 1999 .

[47]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  In justice we trust: Exploring knowledge-sharing continuance intentions in virtual communities of practice , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[48]  John C. Mowen,et al.  The 3M Model of Motivation and Personality , 2000 .

[49]  J. Mowen.  The 3M Model of Motivation and Personality: Theory and Empirical Applications to Consumer Behavior , 1999 .

[50]  David Gefen,et al.  Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[51]  France Bélanger,et al.  Trust and Risk in eGovernment Adoption , 2008, AMCIS.

[52]  Matthew Pearson,et al.  Online social networking on campus: understanding what matters in student culture , 2010 .