Stakeholders’ Influence and Contribution to Social Standards Development: The Case of Multiple Stakeholder Approach to ISO 26000 Development

We present an empirical investigation on how multiple stakeholders can influence and contribute to a standard development process. Based on the analysis of comments submitted by stakeholders developing ISO 26000 standard for social responsibility, we found no significant differences between the ratio of accepted and non-accepted comments among various stakeholder groups; however, we conclude that industry is the most influential stakeholder due to the volume of the comments. We also present a set of processes that stakeholders follow to influence and contribute to standards development, namely to (1) eliminate issues that are controversial and undesirable; (2) link and integrate the standard into a network of other documents and ISO standards; (3) seek consensus by highlighting areas for further dialogue or by addressing their exclusion from the standards development, (4) reinforce issues that are important; and (5) improve the content of the new standard. In conclusion, we provide a set of propositions about multi-stakeholder standards development and compare multi-stakeholder involvement in standards developed through a new committee established in existing standards setting organization [i.e., Committees within the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)] and through new standards setting organizations established for one specific task (i.e., Forest Stewardship Council). We envisage that our study will be a useful platform to monitor and evaluate future developments of ISO 26000 and other multi-stakeholder standards.

[1]  Sigrid Quack,et al.  Contested rules and shifting boundaries: International standard setting in accounting , 2005 .

[2]  M. Conroy,et al.  Branded!: How the 'Certification Revolution' is Transforming Global Corporations , 2007 .

[3]  Timothy Smith,et al.  Rival private governance networks: Competing to define the rules of sustainability performance , 2010 .

[4]  Sigrid Quack,et al.  Globalization and Institutions , 2003 .

[5]  Timothy G. Pollock,et al.  Media Legitimation Effects in the Market for Initial Public Offerings , 2003 .

[6]  Peter Walgenbach,et al.  Technical Efficiency or Adaptation to Institutionalized Expectations? The Adoption of ISO 9000 Standards in the German Mechanical Engineering Industry , 2005 .

[7]  Kristina Tamm Hallström,et al.  Organizing the Process of Standardization , 2002 .

[8]  Charles J. Corbett,et al.  The Financial Impact of ISO 9000 Certification in the United States: An Empirical Analysis , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[9]  F. Khodabocus,et al.  THE ISO 14001 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AS A MOTIVATION TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT , 2010 .

[10]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[11]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  The Strategic Use of Decentralized Institutions: Exploring Certification With the ISO 14001 Management Standard , 2005 .

[12]  Walter Mattli,et al.  Setting International Standards: Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power? , 2003 .

[13]  Mile Terziovski,et al.  Quality audit roles and skills: Perceptions of non-financial auditors and their clients , 2007 .

[14]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1973 .

[15]  Ans Kolk,et al.  Global Rule-Setting for Business: A Critical Analysis of Multi-Stakeholder Standards , 2007 .

[16]  Ulrika Mörth.  Soft law in governance and regulation : an interdisciplinary analysis. , 2004 .

[17]  E. Meidinger,et al.  Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning Countries: Part of a Sustainable Future? , 2006 .

[18]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  Industry Self-Regulation Without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry's Responsible Care Program , 2000 .

[19]  Nicole Darnall,et al.  Stakeholder Involvement in the Design of U.S. Voluntary Environmental Programs: Does Sponsorship Matter? , 2003 .

[20]  Michaela A. Balzarova,et al.  ISO 26000 and supply chains--On the diffusion of the social responsibility standard , 2008 .

[21]  A. Richardson,et al.  Regulatory networks for accounting and auditing standards: A social network analysis of Canadian and international standard-setting , 2009 .

[22]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Media Reputation as a Strategic Resource: An Integration of Mass Communication and Resource-Based Theories , 1999 .

[23]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Constructing Markets and Shaping Boundaries: Entrepreneurial Power in Nascent Fields , 2009 .

[24]  Magnus Boström,et al.  Regulatory Credibility and Authority through Inclusiveness: Standardization Organizations in Cases of Eco-Labelling , 2006 .

[25]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy , 1975 .

[26]  C. Huxham,et al.  Leadership In The Shaping And Implementation Of Collaboration Agendas: How Things Happen In A (Not Quite) Joined-Up World , 2000 .

[27]  Michaela A. Balzarova,et al.  The impact of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 on standardisation of social responsibility—an inside perspective , 2008 .

[28]  S. Clegg,et al.  Power and Organizations , 2006 .

[29]  R. Weber.  Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[30]  Andrew J. Ward,et al.  Certifications and Reputation: Determining the Standard of Desirability Amidst Uncertainty , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[31]  E. Neumayer,et al.  Uneven Geographies of Organizational Practice: Explaining the Cross-National Transfer and Diffusion of ISO 9000 , 2004 .

[32]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Constructive Partnerships: When Alliances between Private Firms and Public Actors can Enable Creative Strategies , 2006 .

[33]  Magnus Boström,et al.  Transnational Multi-Stakeholder Standardization , 2010 .

[34]  Making social responsibility the standard , 2006 .

[35]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[36]  Charles J. Corbett,et al.  INTERNATIONAL DIFFUSION OF ISO 14000 CERTIFICATION , 2001 .

[37]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[38]  Jean-Pascal Gond,et al.  Measuring the Unmeasured: An Institutional Entrepreneur Strategy in an Emerging Industry , 2004 .

[39]  M. Finnemore.  Norms, culture, and world politics: insights from sociology's institutionalism , 1996, International Organization.

[40]  Michaela A. Balzarova,et al.  Underlying mechanisms in the maintenance of ISO 14001 environmental management system , 2008 .

[41]  Bengt Jacobsson,et al.  The Contemporary Expansion of Standardization , 2002 .

[42]  Michaela A. Balzarova,et al.  Social responsibility standardization: Guidance or reinforcement through certification? , 2008 .

[43]  M. Delmas.  The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective , 2002 .

[44]  James Perry,et al.  International Accounting Standard Setting: A Network Approach , 2005, Business and Politics.

[45]  G. Garrett.  Global Markets and National Politics: Collision Course or Virtuous Circle? , 1998, International Organization.

[46]  Patrick G. Maggitti,et al.  Market Watch: Information and Availability Cascades Among the Media and Investors in the U.S. IPO Market , 2008 .

[47]  Jane V. Wheeler,et al.  Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams , 2003 .