The hand grasps the center, while the eyes saccade to the top of novel objects

In the present study, we investigated whether indenting the sides of novel objects (e.g., product packaging) would influence where people grasp, and hence focus their gaze, under the assumption that gaze precedes grasping. In Experiment 1, the participants grasped a selection of custom-made objects designed to resemble typical packaging forms with an indentation in the upper, middle, or lower part. In Experiment 2, eye movements were recorded while the participants viewed differently-sized (small, medium, and large) objects with the same three indentation positions tested in Experiment 1, together with a control object lacking any indentation. The results revealed that irrespective of the location of the indentation, the participants tended to grasp the mid-region of the object, with their index finger always positioned slightly above its midpoint. Importantly, the first visual fixation tended to fall in the cap region of the novel object. The participants also fixated for longer in this region. Furthermore, participants saccaded more often, as well saccading more rapidly when directing their gaze to the upper region of the objects that they were required to inspect visually. Taken together, these results therefore suggest that different spatial locations on target objects are of interest to our eyes and hands.

[1]  L. Wright,et al.  Gaining competitive advantage from packaging and labelling in marketing communications , 1998 .

[2]  Krista A. Ehinger,et al.  Modelling search for people in 900 scenes: A combined source model of eye guidance , 2009 .

[3]  C. Spence,et al.  Changes in tactile sensitivity over the time-course of a goal-directed movement , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[4]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension , 1994, Current Biology.

[5]  Peter König,et al.  Influence of disparity on fixation and saccades in free viewing of natural scenes. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[6]  Katsumi Aoki,et al.  Recent development of flow visualization , 2004, J. Vis..

[7]  R. Pieters,et al.  Visual attention during brand choice : The impact of time pressure and task motivation , 1999 .

[8]  D Elliott,et al.  Eye-hand coordination in goal-directed aiming. , 2001, Human movement science.

[9]  D. Senkowski,et al.  The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Benjamin W Tatler,et al.  The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[11]  A. Mizuno,et al.  A change of the leading player in flow Visualization technique , 2006, J. Vis..

[12]  Andrew T. Duchowski,et al.  Eye tracking within the packaging design workflow: interaction with physical and virtual shelves , 2011, NGCA '11.

[13]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Experience-dependent visual cue integration based on consistencies between visual and haptic percepts , 2001, Vision Research.

[14]  P. Wurtz,et al.  Size Matters: Saccades during Scene Perception , 2007, Perception.

[15]  Jan P.L. Schoormans,et al.  The effect of new package design on product attention, categorization and evaluation , 1997 .

[16]  C. Spence,et al.  Attention and the crossmodal construction of space , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  K. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Human grasp point selection. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[18]  Donna Lloyd,et al.  In Touch with the Future: The Sense of Touch from Cognitive Neuroscience to Virtual Reality , 2014, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[19]  A. Wing,et al.  Anticipating load torques produced by voluntary movements. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Computational modelling of hand-eye coordination , 1992 .

[21]  Charles Spence,et al.  The weight of the bottle as a possible extrinsic cue with which to estimate the price (and quality) of the wine? Observed correlations , 2012 .

[22]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[23]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[24]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Attentional selection during preparation of prehension movements , 2003 .

[25]  Toshio Inui,et al.  The effect of viewing the moving limb and target object during the early phase of movement on the online control of grasping. , 2006, Human movement science.

[26]  R. Johansson,et al.  Eye–Hand Coordination in Object Manipulation , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target , 1979, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  Francesco Pavani,et al.  Grasping actions remap peripersonal space , 2009, Neuroreport.

[29]  B. Scholl.  Objects and attention: the state of the art , 2001, Cognition.

[30]  Bo Rundh,et al.  Packaging design: creating competitive advantage with product packaging , 2009 .

[31]  Iván Lidón,et al.  The identification of viewing patterns of chocolate snack packages using eye-tracking techniques , 2015 .

[32]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? , 2001, Vision Research.

[33]  Charles Spence,et al.  Using combined eye tracking and word association in order to assess novel packaging solutions: A case study involving jam jars , 2013 .

[34]  J. Clement.  Visual influence on in-store buying decisions: an eye-track experiment on the visual influence of packaging design , 2007 .

[35]  Masaaki Kawahashi,et al.  Renovation of Journal of Visualization , 2010, J. Vis..

[36]  K. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Differences in fixations between grasping and viewing objects. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[37]  T. Miller.  Eye-Hand Coordination , 2008 .

[38]  S. Tipper,et al.  Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  A. L. Yarbus,et al.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967, Springer US.

[40]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Center or side: biases in selecting grasp points on small bars , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  R. Pieters,et al.  A Review of Eye-Tracking Research in Marketing , 2008 .

[42]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[43]  Charles Spence,et al.  The multisensory packaging of beverages , 2012 .

[44]  Azizah Jaafar,et al.  Usability of package and label designs using eye tracking , 2011, 2011 IEEE Conference on Open Systems.

[45]  Andrew T Duchowski,et al.  A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[46]  M. Land,et al.  The Roles of Vision and Eye Movements in the Control of Activities of Daily Living , 1998, Perception.

[47]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Eye tracking for visual marketing , 2008 .

[48]  Jian-Jun Zhang,et al.  Multimodality with Eye tracking and Haptics: A New Horizon for Serious Games? , 2014, Int. J. Serious Games.

[49]  L. Itti,et al.  Quantifying center bias of observers in free viewing of dynamic natural scenes. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[50]  Joe Causer,et al.  Congruency of gaze metrics in action, imagery and action observation , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[51]  Howard R. Moskowitz,et al.  Packaging Research in Food Product Design and Development , 2009 .

[52]  Constanze Hesse,et al.  Why do the eyes prefer the index finger? Simultaneous recording of eye and hand movements during precision grasping. , 2013, Journal of vision.