Red Light, Green Light: Making Sense of the Organizational Context for Issue Selling

This paper analyzes the contextual cues female managers attend to when considering raising gender-equity issues at work. Study 1 provides a qualitative look at the range of cues indicating context favorability, including demographic patterns, top management qualities, and cultural exclusivity. Study 2 experimentally manipulates these cues and reveals that the exclusiveness of organizational culture is the most potent cue affecting willingness to sell a gender-equity issue. A discussion of mediators sheds lights on why cultural exclusivity affects issue selling.

[1]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[2]  Debra Meyerson,et al.  Tempered Radicals: How People Use Difference to Inspire Change at Work , 2001 .

[3]  Katherine A. Lawrence,et al.  Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. , 2001 .

[4]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Organizational Silence: A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World , 2000 .

[5]  Daniel A Meisel.  Blowing the whistle , 2000, The Lancet.

[6]  E. Morrison,et al.  Taking Charge At Work: Extrarole Efforts to Initiate Workplace Change , 1999 .

[7]  Robert K. Kazanjian,et al.  Multilevel Theorizing about Creativity in Organizations: A Sensemaking Perspective , 1999 .

[8]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Being Different Yet Feeling Similar: The Influence Of Demographic Composition And Organizational Culture On Work Processes And Outcomes , 1998 .

[9]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Toward a Social Understanding of How People Learn in Organizations , 1998 .

[10]  Jon M. Werner,et al.  Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior , 1998 .

[11]  Christine M. Beckman,et al.  An Alternative to Bureaucratic Impersonality and Emotional Labor: Bounded Emotionality at the Body Shop , 1998 .

[12]  N. Rothbard,et al.  Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. , 1998 .

[13]  D. Meyerson,et al.  Women and Power: Conformity, Resistance, and Disorganized Coaction , 1998 .

[14]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Power and influence in organizations , 1998 .

[15]  C. Steele.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[16]  Elizabeth E. Wierba,et al.  Reading the wind: how middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers , 1997 .

[17]  Barbara S. Lawrence,et al.  Perspective---The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[18]  Joseph Soeters,et al.  Organizational factors influencing homogeneity and heterogenity of organizational cultures , 1997 .

[19]  B. Lawrence.  The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[20]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Control, Interdependence and Power: Understanding Social Cognition in Its Social Context , 1996 .

[21]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[22]  Robin J. Ely,et al.  The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. , 1994 .

[23]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  Adaptive Self-regulation: A Process View of Managerial Effectiveness , 1994 .

[24]  Randall P. White,et al.  Breaking the glass ceiling : can women reach the top of America's largest corporations? , 1994 .

[25]  J. Dutton,et al.  SELLING ISSUES TO TOP MANAGEMENT , 1993 .

[26]  K. Reardon.  The memo every woman keeps in her desk , 1993 .

[27]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation , 1991 .

[28]  P. Herr,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective , 1991 .

[29]  D. Krackhardt.  Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. , 1990 .

[30]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of Technological Innovation. , 1990 .

[31]  K. Ramsey McGowen,et al.  Still different after all these years: Gender differences in professional identity formation. , 1990 .

[32]  M. Ronald Buckley,et al.  The contributory effects of supervisor intentions on subordinate feedback responses , 1989 .

[33]  J. Weiss.  The powers of problem definition: The case of government paperwork , 1989 .

[34]  D. Mackie,et al.  Intergroup relations. , 2019, Annual Review of Psychology.

[35]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[36]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[37]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  P. Brickman,et al.  Moral outrage and pragmatism: Explanations for collective action ☆ , 1984 .

[39]  M R Louis,et al.  Surprise and sense making: what newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. , 1980, Administrative science quarterly.

[40]  Mary Anne Devanna.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[41]  Michael A. Berger,et al.  Social Movements in Organizations: Coup d'Etat, Insurgency, and Mass Movements , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  Huw Beynon,et al.  Exploring the Industrial Subculture , 1973 .

[43]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .

[44]  Donn Byrne,et al.  Effect of economic similarity-dissimilarity on interpersonal attraction. , 1966 .