Physiological Basis of Successful Breeding Strategies for Maize Grain Yield

During the maize (Zea mays L.) hybrid era (1939 to present), commercial grain yields have improved neady sixfold and the genetic component of the improvement has been estimated as approximately 60%. In this paper, we examine physiological factors and successful breeding strategies that underlie the yield improvement. Grain yield is the product of accumulating dry matter and allocating a portion of the total dry matter to the grain. The processes influencing dry matter accumulation are commonly referred to as the "source" components, while the processes influencing allocation of dry matter to the grain are referred to as the "sink" components. On the source side, changes in leaf canopy size and architecture account for only a minor portion of the improvement. The majority of the improvement in source capacity is due to visual and functional "stay-green." On the sink side, the improvement is through changes in the relationship between kernel number per plant and plant growth rate during a period bracketing silking. In a breeding context, these improvements have been made (i) in a "closed" gemplasm pool stratified into heterotic groups; (ii) through use of a pedigree method of breeding structured to mimic reciprocal recurrent selection and thereby improving both additive and nonadditive genetic effects; and (iii) by a gradual increase in plant population densities during the hybrid era as the constant source of stress during both inbred line development and hybrid commercialization. Functional stay-green and the sink establishment dynamics still represent opportunities for yield improvements. It is essential that source and sink are kept in balance, and that improvement in one accompanies a simultaneous improvement in the other. One strategy for exploiting these opportunities is to incorporate high plant population density trials into inbred line development programs.

[1]  M. Cooper,et al.  Changes in drought tolerance in maize associated with fifty years of breeding for yield in the US Corn Belt [Zea mays L.] , 2006 .

[2]  D. W. Stewart,et al.  Ear and Kernel Formation in Maize Hybrids Representing Three Decades of Grain Yield Improvement in Ontario , 1992 .

[3]  A. F. Troyer,et al.  Statistical methods in seed corn product selection , 1988 .

[4]  R. Bernardo,et al.  Molecular marker diversity among current and historical maize inbreds , 2001, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[5]  J. Crow 90 years ago: the beginning of hybrid maize. , 1998, Genetics.

[6]  T. Gebbing,et al.  Pre-Anthesis Reserve Utilization for Protein and Carbohydrate Synthesis in Grains of Wheat. , 1999, Plant physiology.

[7]  S. Kresovich,et al.  SSR Variation in Important U.S. Maize Inbred Lines , 2002 .

[8]  V. B. Cardwell,et al.  Fifty Years of Minnesota Corn Production: Sources of Yield Increase1 , 1982 .

[9]  A. Mariotti,et al.  C and N Mobilization from Stalk and Leaves during Kernel Filling by C and N Tracing in Zea mays L. , 1990, Plant physiology.

[10]  O. Smith,et al.  Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs , 1990, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[11]  M. Tollenaar DISSECTION OF PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESSES UNDERLYING GRAIN YIELD IN MAIZE BY EXAMINING GENETIC IMPROVEMENT AND HETEROSIS , 2006 .

[12]  M. Tollenaar,et al.  Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize , 2002 .

[13]  P. Hazell,et al.  Possible genetic causes of increased variability in U.S. maize yields. , 1989 .

[14]  J. Dudley,et al.  Evolution of North American Dent Corn from Public to Proprietary Germplasm , 2006 .

[15]  C. Welcker,et al.  Analysis of photoperiod sensitivity within a collection of tropical maize populations , 2002, Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution.

[16]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Yield Improvement in Temperate Maize is Attributable to Greater Stress Tolerance , 1999 .

[17]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Maize Leaf Absorptance of Photosynthetically Active Radiation and Its Estimation Using a Chlorophyll Meter , 1997 .

[18]  M. Tollenaar,et al.  Physiological Basis of Heterosis for Grain Yield in Maize , 2004 .

[19]  M. Tollenaar,et al.  Effect of Weed Interference and Soil Nitrogen on Four Maize Hybrids , 1994 .

[20]  L. Evans,et al.  The contribution of stem reserves to grain development in a range of wheat cultivars of different height , 1971 .

[21]  Steve Langton,et al.  Classification of maize environments using crop simulation and geographic information systems , 2005 .

[22]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Developing drought- and low N-tolerant maize , 1997 .

[23]  C. Hamel,et al.  Crop yield : physiology and processes , 1999 .

[24]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Grain Yield is Reduced More by Weed Interference in an Old than in a New Maize Hybrid , 1997 .

[25]  O. K. Chung,et al.  Relational Database System for Summarization and Interpretation of Hard Winter Wheat Regional Quality Data , 1999 .

[26]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Response of maize leaf photosynthesis to low temperature during the grain-filling period , 2000 .

[27]  H. F. Robinson,et al.  A Breeding Procedure Designed To Make Maximum Use of Both General and Specific Combining Ability , 1949 .

[28]  H. Schnyder The role of carbohydrate storage and redistribution in the source‐sink relations of wheat and barley during grain filling — a review , 1993 .

[29]  T. Nelson,et al.  Identification of multiple stages in the conversion of vegetative to floral development , 1991 .

[30]  Christopher J. Kucharik,et al.  A Multidecadal Trend of Earlier Corn Planting in the Central USA , 2006 .

[31]  M. Tollenaar,et al.  Kernel Number Determination in Argentinean Maize Hybrids Released between 1965 and 1993 , 2004 .

[32]  S. Long,et al.  Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[33]  R. Richards Selectable traits to increase crop photosynthesis and yield of grain crops. , 2000, Journal of experimental botany.

[34]  D. Duvick The Contribution of Breeding to Yield Advances in maize (Zea mays L.) , 2005 .

[35]  Sandra C. Stark,et al.  Plant Breeding: Past, Present, and Future , 2008 .

[36]  G. Shull The composition of a field of maize , 1908 .

[37]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Variation in Quantum Yield for CO(2) Uptake among C(3) and C(4) Plants. , 1983, Plant physiology.

[38]  H. Bohnert,et al.  Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. , 2000, Current opinion in plant biology.

[39]  D. Duvick,et al.  Post–Green Revolution Trends in Yield Potential of Temperate Maize in the North‐Central United States , 1999 .

[40]  D. Duvick What is yield , 1997 .

[41]  O. S. Smith,et al.  Grain Filling and Field Drying of a Set of Maize Hybrids Released From 1930 to 1982 1 , 1985 .

[42]  L. M. Dwyer,et al.  Physiology of Maize , 1999 .

[43]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Differences among commercial maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids in respiration rates of mature leaves , 1998 .

[44]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Kernel Set in Maize Hybrids and Their Inbred Lines Exposed to Stress , 2006 .

[45]  A. Kamei,et al.  Molecular responses to drought, salinity and frost: common and different paths for plant protection. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[46]  J. Boyer Plant Productivity and Environment , 1982, Science.

[47]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Improving Tolerance to Abiotic Stresses in Staple Crops: A Random or Planned Process? , 2008 .

[48]  M. E. Otegui,et al.  Genotypic Variability in Morphological and Physiological Traits among Maize Inbred Lines—Nitrogen Responses , 2006 .

[49]  H. Corke,et al.  Selection for vegetative phase and actual filling period duration in short season maize , 1989 .

[50]  T. B. Daynard,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FINAL YIELD AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS AT FLOWERING IN INDIVIDUAL MAIZE PLANTS , 1979 .

[51]  H. Thomas,et al.  Five ways to stay green. , 2000, Journal of experimental botany.

[52]  R. M. Castleberry,et al.  Genetic Yield Improvement of U.S. Maize Cultivars under Varying Fertility and Climatic Environments1 , 1984 .

[53]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Physiological Basis of the Genetic Improvement of Corn , 1994 .

[54]  F. Below,et al.  Availability of reduced N and carbohydrates for ear development of maize. , 1981, Plant physiology.

[55]  M. Tollenaar,et al.  Heterosis for Leaf CO2 Exchange Rate during the Grain‐Filling Period in Maize , 2004 .