Limits to the use of threatened species lists

Threatened species lists are designed primarily to provide an easily understood qualitative estimate of risk of extinction. Although these estimates of risk can be accurate, the lists have inevitably become linked to several decision-making processes. There are four ways in which such lists are commonly used: to set priorities for resource allocation for species recovery; to inform reserve system design; to constrain development and exploitation; and to report on the state of the environment. The lists were not designed for any one of these purposes, and consequently perform some of them poorly. We discuss why, if and how they should be used to achieve these purposes.

[1]  Chris R. Dickman,et al.  An ecological approach to identifying the endangered fauna of New South Wales , 1995 .

[2]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  TURNER REVIEW No. 5 Are listed threatened plant species actually at risk , 2002 .

[3]  S. Andelman,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks , 2000 .

[4]  David N. Pashley,et al.  Conservation Report: Setting Conservation Priorities for Landbirds in the United States: The Partners in Flight Approach , 2000 .

[5]  Michael A. Kamrin,et al.  Scientific Uncertainty and Environmental Problem Solving , 1997 .

[6]  S. Andelman,et al.  Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  S. Andelman,et al.  Making smart conservation decisions , 2001 .

[8]  D. Rubinoff,et al.  Evaluating the California Gnatcatcher as an Umbrella Species for Conservation of Southern California Coastal Sage Scrub , 2001 .

[9]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Using probability of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservation , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  James Perran Ross Crocodile conservation action : a special publication of the Crocodile Specialist Group of the Species Survival Commission of the IUCN - The World Conservation Union , 1992 .

[11]  Lawrence L. Master,et al.  Assessing Threats and Setting Priorities for Conservation , 1991 .

[12]  Herbert H. T. Prins,et al.  Species Conservation: The 1994 IUCN Red List categories discussed , 1999 .

[13]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Assessing Extinction Threats: Toward a Reevaluation of IUCN Threatened Species Categories , 1991 .

[14]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  Are listed threatened plant species actually at risk , 2002 .

[15]  David A. Keith,et al.  An Evaluation and Modification of World Conservation Union Red List Criteria for Classification of Extinction Risk in Vascular Plants , 1998 .

[16]  Harry F. Recher,et al.  Species Triage—Seeing Beyond Wounded Rhinos , 1992 .

[17]  R. Noss,et al.  High-risk ecosystems as foci for considering biodiversity and ecological integrity in ecological risk assessments , 2000 .

[18]  Renee Mullen,et al.  The Nature Conservancy's approach to prioritizing conservation action , 2000 .

[19]  R M May,et al.  How much do we know about the current extinction rate? , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  S. Ferson,et al.  Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology , 2002, Springer New York.

[21]  Paul R. Wade,et al.  CALCULATING LIMITS TO THE ALLOWABLE HUMAN‐CAUSED MORTALITY OF CETACEANS AND PINNIPEDS , 1998 .

[22]  Andrew Metrick,et al.  Patterns of Behavior in Biodiversity Preservation , 1994 .

[23]  J. Berger,et al.  Population Constraints Associated with the Use of Black Rhinos as an Umbrella Species for Desert Herbivores , 1997 .

[24]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much? , 1996 .

[25]  Jonathan S. Adams,et al.  Precious heritage : the status of biodiversity in the United States , 2000 .

[26]  Ulf Gärdenfors,et al.  Classifying threatened species at national versus global levels , 2001 .

[27]  Terry Walshe,et al.  Uncertainty in Comparative Risk Analysis for Threatened Australian Plant Species , 1999 .

[28]  B. Czech,et al.  Distribution and Causation of Species Endangerment in the United States , 1997 .

[29]  David R. Breininger,et al.  Prioritizing Wildlife Taxa for Biological Diversity Conservation at the Local Scale , 1998, Environmental management.

[30]  Gerardo Ceballos,et al.  ASSESSING CONSERVATION PRIORITIES IN MEGADIVERSE MEXICO: MAMMALIAN DIVERSITY, ENDEMICITY, AND ENDANGERMENT , 1998 .