Is the internet a better public sphere? Comparing old and new media in the USA and Germany

Normative theorists of the public sphere, such as Jürgen Habermas, have been very critical of the ‘old’ mass media, which were seen as unable to promote free and plural societal communication. The advent of the internet, in contrast, gave rise to hopes that it would make previously marginalized actors and arguments more visible to a broader public. To assess these claims, this article compares the internet and mass media communication. It distinguishes three levels of both the offline and the online public sphere, which differ in their structural prerequisites, in their openness for participation and in their influence on the wider society. Using this model, the article compares the levels that are most strongly structured and most influential for the wider society: the mass media and communication as organized by search engines. Using human genome research and analysing Germany and the USA, the study looks at which actors, evaluations and frames are present in the print mass media and on websites, and finds that internet communication does not differ significantly from the offline debate in the print media.

[1]  R. Schiffer,et al.  INTRODUCTION , 1988, Neurology.

[2]  Alan Randolph Kluver.  China Information , 1988 .

[3]  C. Hill,et al.  Introduction to P & I , 1988 .

[4]  Ferrée.  Shaping Abortion Discourse , 2002 .

[5]  J. Wilke.  Leitmedien und Zielgruppenorgane , 1999 .

[6]  Ann C. Zimmermann.  Demokratisierung und Europäisierung online , 2008 .

[7]  Dieter Rucht,et al.  Politische Diskurse im Internet und in Zeitungen : das Beispiel Genfood , 2008 .

[8]  Nicholas W. Jankowski,et al.  Internet-based political discourse : a case study of electronic democracy in Hoogeveen , 2004 .

[9]  Andrew L. Mendelson,et al.  Public life and the internet: if you build a better website, will citizens become engaged? , 2008, New Media Soc..

[10]  Peter Dahlgren.  The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation , 2005 .

[11]  A. Fung,et al.  One City, Two Systems: Democracy in an Electronic Chat Room in Hong Kong , 2002 .

[12]  R. Salaverría,et al.  An Immature Medium , 2005 .

[13]  Linda A. Macaulay,et al.  The digital divide and the theory of optimal slack , 2008, New Media Soc..

[14]  A. Smart.  Reporting the dawn of the post-genomic era: who wants to live forever? , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[15]  Nicholas Garnham,et al.  Habermas and the public sphere , 2007 .

[16]  Jürgen Gerhards,et al.  Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies , 2002 .

[17]  Michelle Rodino-Colocino.  Laboring under the digital divide , 2006, New Media Soc..

[18]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[19]  Kim， Euiyoung.  On Associative Democracy , 2005 .

[20]  Jurgita Matačinskaitė,et al.  The Internet as a “Public Sphere” , 2011 .

[21]  Eleazar Parmly.  Address , 1846, The American journal of dental science.

[22]  Tilo Hartmann,et al.  Macht der Neuen Medien? , 2005 .

[23]  Mike S. Schäfer,et al.  The ‘Book of Life’ in the Press , 2005, Social studies of science.

[24]  James E. Curtis,et al.  Nations of Joiners: Explaining Voluntary Association Membership in Democratic Societies , 2001, American Sociological Review.

[25]  T. Oblak.  Dialogue and Representation: Communication in the Electronic Public Sphere , 2002 .

[26]  Marcel Machill,et al.  Search-engine research: a European-American overview and systematization of an interdisciplinary and international research field , 2008 .

[27]  B. Loader,et al.  Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens and Social Movements , 2004 .

[28]  P. Vangelisti,et al.  The Book Of Life , 2001 .

[29]  Matthias Kohring,et al.  The face(t)s of biotech in the nineties: how the German press framed modern biotechnology , 2002, Public understanding of science.

[30]  J. Tucker.  Gene wars. , 1984, Foreign policy.

[31]  M. Ruffin.  On being digital. , 1995, Physician executive.

[32]  Scott L. Althaus,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Political Communication Patterns of Internet and Traditional News Media Use in a Networked Community Patterns of Internet and Traditional News Media Use in a Networked Community , 2022 .

[33]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  THE NEW GOLDEN RULE Community and Morality in a Democratic Society , 1997 .

[34]  Yongnian Zheng,et al.  Information Technology, Public Space, and Collective Action in China , 2005 .

[35]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[36]  C. Calhoun,et al.  Habermas and the Public Sphere. , 1993 .

[37]  Owen Williams,et al.  Search Engine Watch , 2005 .

[38]  B. Barber.  Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age , 1985 .

[39]  Nicholas W. Jankowski,et al.  The promise and practice of public debate in cyberspace , 2000 .

[40]  John E. Kwoka,et al.  Large Firm Dominance and Price-Cost Margins in Manufacturing Industries , 1977 .

[41]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm , 1993 .

[42]  Alfons Bora,et al.  Biotechnology in the public sphere. , 2000 .

[43]  Christoph Bieber.  Parteienkommunikation im Internet: Modernisierung von Mitgliederparteien? , 2002 .

[44]  Nicholas W. Jankowski,et al.  POLITICAL COMMUNICATION ABOUT EUROPE ON THE INTERNET DURING THE 2004 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ELECTION CAMPAIGN IN NINE EU MEMBER STATES , 2007 .

[45]  Brian McKenna,et al.  Virtual Community , 1998, Online Inf. Rev..

[46]  Frank I. Michelman,et al.  Between Facts and Norms , 1992 .

[47]  Dinosaurs in Cyberspace? , 2003 .

[48]  J. Habermas.  The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere , 1962 .

[49]  A. Pilnick.  Genetics And Society , 2002 .