Examining fire-prone forest landscapes as coupled human and natural systems

Fire-prone landscapes are not well studied as coupled human and natural systems (CHANS) and present many challenges for understanding and promoting adaptive behaviors and institutions. Here, we explore how heterogeneity, feedbacks, and external drivers in this type of natural hazard system can lead to complexity and can limit the development of more adaptive approaches to policy and management. Institutions and social networks can counter these limitations and promote adaptation. We also develop a conceptual model that includes a robust characterization of social subsystems for a fire-prone landscape in Oregon and describe how we are building an agent-based model to promote understanding of this social-ecological system. Our agent-based model, which incorporates existing ecological models of vegetation and fire and is based on empirical studies of landowner decision-making, will be used to explore alternative management and fire scenarios with land managers and various public entities. We expect that the development of CHANS frameworks and the application of a simulation model in a collaborative setting will facilitate the development of more effective policies and practices for fire-prone landscapes.

[1]  J. Hicke,et al.  Effects of bark beetle-caused tree mortality on wildfire , 2012 .

[2]  T. Swetnam,et al.  Warming and Earlier Spring Increase Western U.S. Forest Wildfire Activity , 2006, Science.

[3]  Greg Latta,et al.  Biomass production from the U.S. forest and agriculture sectors in support of a renewable electricity standard , 2013 .

[4]  J. W. Bruce,et al.  The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths , 2001 .

[5]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Interacting Factors Driving a Major Loss of Large Trees with Cavities in a Forest Ecosystem , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Newly discovered landscape traps produce regime shifts in wet forests , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Phil F. Brogan.  East of the Cascades , 1940 .

[8]  Alan A. Ager,et al.  Objective and perceived wildfire risk and its influence on private forest landowners' fuel reduction activities in Oregon's (USA) ponderosa pine ecoregion , 2014 .

[9]  M. L. Cadenasso,et al.  Biocomplexity in Coupled Natural–Human Systems: A Multidimensional Framework , 2004, Ecosystems.

[10]  Susan K. Jacobson,et al.  Training Idiot Savants: The Lack of Human Dimensions in Conservation Biology , 1998 .

[11]  M. Pelling,et al.  Understanding adaptation: What can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? , 2005 .

[12]  S. Charnley,et al.  Risk and Cooperation: Managing Hazardous Fuel in Mixed Ownership Landscapes , 2012, Environmental Management.

[13]  David Hulse,et al.  Anticipating floodplain trajectories: a comparison of two alternative futures approaches , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[14]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Challenges and a checklist for biodiversity conservation in fire-prone forests: Perspectives from the Pacific Northwest of USA and Southeastern Australia , 2012 .

[15]  Robert E. Keane,et al.  Cascading effects of fire exclusion in Rocky Mountain ecosystems: a literature review , 2002 .

[16]  StocksBrian,et al.  America's Fires: A Historical Context for Policy and Practice , 2010 .

[17]  Jay D. Miller,et al.  Quantitative Evidence for Increasing Forest Fire Severity in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA , 2009, Ecosystems.

[18]  Christine Eriksen,et al.  The art of learning: wildfire, amenity migration and local environmental knowledge , 2011 .

[19]  David J. Ganz,et al.  Climate change and disruptions to global fire activity , 2012 .

[20]  Carl N. Skinner,et al.  Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments , 2005 .

[21]  Peter Klepeis,et al.  Re-creating the Rural, Reconstructing Nature: An International Literature Review of the Environmental Implications of Amenity Migration , 2012 .

[22]  William L. Baker,et al.  Managing fire-prone forests in the western United States , 2006 .

[23]  Christopher I. Roos,et al.  Fire in the Earth System , 2009, Science.

[24]  Jon E. Keeley,et al.  Ecological effects of large fires on US landscapes: benefit or catastrophe? , 2008, International Journal of Wildland Fire.

[25]  T. Spies,et al.  Mixed-conifer forests of central Oregon: effects of logging and fire exclusion vary with environment. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[26]  W. Romme,et al.  The Interaction of Fire, Fuels, and Climate across Rocky Mountain Forests , 2004 .

[27]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems , 2007, Science.

[28]  Donald McKenzie,et al.  Climate and Ecoprovince Fire Area Burned 1 Running head : CLIMATE AND ECOPROVINCE FIRE AREA BURNED 1 2 CLIMATE AND WILDFIRE AREA BURNED IN WESTERN , 2007 .

[29]  J. Agee.  Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests , 1993 .

[30]  J. Fried,et al.  Homeowner Perspectives on Fire Hazard, Responsibility, and Management Strategies at the Wildland-Urban Interface , 2000 .

[31]  Ian Scoones,et al.  New Ecology and the Social Sciences: What Prospects for a Fruitful Engagement? , 1999 .

[32]  Eric M. White,et al.  Past and projected rural land conversion in the US at state, regional, and national levels , 2009 .

[33]  M. Skidmore,et al.  DO NATURAL DISASTERS PROMOTE LONG‐RUN GROWTH? , 2002 .

[34]  Jean-Christophe Castella,et al.  Assessing the role of learning devices and geovisualisation tools for collective action in natural resource management: Experiences from Vietnam. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[35]  P. Hessburg,et al.  An environmental narrative of Inland Northwest United States forests, 1800–2000 , 2003 .

[36]  Gregg M. Garfin,et al.  Human Pyrogeography: A New Synergy of Fire, Climate and People is Reshaping Ecosystems across the Globe , 2011 .

[37]  R. Keane,et al.  Evaluating the ecological benefits of wildfire by integrating fire and ecosystem simulation models , 2010 .

[38]  A. E. Luloff,et al.  Social Landscapes of the Inter‐Mountain West: A Comparison of ‘Old West’ and ‘New West’ Communities* , 2007 .

[39]  Kathleen A. Dahl.  Landscapes of Promise: The Oregon Story, 1800-1940 , 1999 .

[40]  Sarah McCaffrey,et al.  Best practices in risk and crisis communication: Implications for natural hazards management , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[41]  Andrew Reeson,et al.  Agent‐based modeling in ecological economics , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Robert E. Keane,et al.  A conceptual framework for predicting temperate ecosystem sensitivity to human impacts on fire regimes , 2013 .

[43]  R. Stedman,et al.  Wildfire Perception and Community Change , 2010 .

[44]  S. Manson.  Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory , 2001 .

[45]  Gene L. Theodori,et al.  The Influence of Home and Community Attachment on Firewise Behavior , 2010 .

[46]  T. Spies,et al.  Vegetation and weather explain variation in crown damage within a large mixed-severity wildfire. , 2009 .

[47]  W. Adger.  Social and ecological resilience: are they related? , 2000 .

[48]  F. Berkes,et al.  Community Resilience: Toward an Integrated Approach , 2013 .

[49]  C. Folke.  RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES , 2006 .

[50]  Sarah McCaffrey.  Thinking of Wildfire as a Natural Hazard , 2004 .

[51]  George L. W. Perry,et al.  Explaining fire‐driven landscape transformation during the Initial Burning Period of New Zealand's prehistory , 2012 .

[52]  José M. V. Fragoso,et al.  Research on Coupled Human and Natural Systems (CHANS): Approach, Challenges, and Strategies , 2011 .

[53]  B. McFarlane,et al.  An Examination of the Influence of Hazard Experience on Wildfire Risk Perceptions and Adoption of Mitigation Measures , 2009 .

[54]  R. Kasperson,et al.  A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  Franziska Klügl-Frohnmeyer,et al.  A validation methodology for agent-based simulations , 2008, SAC.

[56]  T. Spies,et al.  Conserving Old‐Growth Forest Diversity in Disturbance‐Prone Landscapes , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[57]  Yvonne Everett,et al.  Fire Safe Councils in the Interface , 2011 .

[58]  P. Bartlein,et al.  Long-term perspective on wildfires in the western USA , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  L. An,et al.  Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems : Review of agent-based models , 2012 .

[60]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking , 2007 .

[61]  Toddi A. Steelman,et al.  Federal and State Influence on Community Responses to Wildfire Threats: Arizona, Colorado, and New Mexico , 2004 .

[62]  John Wainwright,et al.  An Agent-Based Model of Mediterranean Agricultural Land-Use/Cover Change for Examining Wildfire Risk , 2008, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[63]  P. Ince,et al.  Modeling future U.S. forest sector market and trade impacts of expansion in wood energy consumption , 2011 .

[64]  M. Finney.  An Overview of FlamMap Fire Modeling Capabilities , 2006 .

[65]  Bruce Evan Goldstein,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Resilience Through Multi-scalar Collaboration The US Fire Learning Network: Springing a Rigidity Trap through Multiscalar Collaborative Networks , 2010 .

[66]  David W. Hulse,et al.  Modeling biocomplexity - actors, landscapes and alternative futures , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[67]  E. White.  Woody Biomass for Bioenergy and Biofuels in the United States- A Briefing Paper , 2015 .

[68]  Martha C. Monroe,et al.  Living with fire: homeowner assessment of landscape values and defensible space in Minnesota and Florida, USA , 2004 .

[69]  Kathryn G. Arano,et al.  Determinants of private forest management decisions: A study on West Virginia NIPF landowners , 2009 .

[70]  A. Fischer,et al.  Reducing Hazardous Fuels on Nonindustrial Private Forests: Factors Influencing Landowner Decisions , 2011 .

[71]  Toddi A. Steelman,et al.  Is Wildfire Policy in the United States Sustainable? , 2007 .

[72]  M. Monroe,et al.  The Look of the Land: Homeowner Landscape Management and Wildfire Preparedness in Minnesota and Florida , 2005 .

[73]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Planning for resilience: modeling change in human–fire interactions in the Alaskan boreal forest , 2003 .

[74]  W. Adger,et al.  Social Capital, Collective Action, and Adaptation to Climate Change , 2003 .

[75]  Christopher I. Roos,et al.  The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth , 2011, Journal of biogeography.

[76]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Insights Into Wildfire Mitigation Decisions Among Wildland–Urban Interface Residents , 2006 .

[77]  Carolyn Dimitri,et al.  The 20th Century Transformation of U.S. Agriculture and Farm Policy , 2005 .

[78]  Robert A. Norheim,et al.  Forest ecosystems, disturbance, and climatic change in Washington State, USA , 2010 .