PET Parametric Imaging: Past, Present, and Future

Positron emission tomography (PET) is actively used in a diverse range of applications in oncology, cardiology, and neurology. The use of PET in the clinical setting focuses on static (single time frame) imaging at a specific time-point post radiotracer injection and is typically considered as semi-quantitative; e.g., standardized uptake value (SUV) measures. In contrast, dynamic PET imaging requires increased acquisition times but has the advantage that it measures the full spatiotemporal distribution of a radiotracer and, in combination with tracer kinetic modeling, enables the generation of multiparametric images that more directly quantify underlying biological parameters of interest, such as blood flow, glucose metabolism, and receptor binding. Parametric images have the potential for improved detection and for more accurate and earlier therapeutic response assessment. Parametric imaging with dynamic PET has witnessed extensive research in the past four decades. In this article, we provide an overview of past and present activities and discuss emerging opportunities in the field of parametric imaging for the future.

[1]  Sirong Chen,et al.  Dual-Tracer PET/CT Imaging in Evaluation of Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Dan J Kadrmas,et al.  Single-scan dual-tracer FLT+FDG PET tumor characterization , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  P. Lecoq,et al.  Pushing the Limits in Time-of-Flight PET Imaging , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[4]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  A survey of approaches for direct parametric image reconstruction in emission tomography. , 2008, Medical physics.

[5]  N. Lassen,et al.  Tracer kinetic methods in medical physiology , 1979 .

[6]  Mark Muzi,et al.  18F-FDG kinetics in locally advanced breast cancer: correlation with tumor blood flow and changes in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  A. Reader,et al.  4D image reconstruction for emission tomography , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  F. Turkheimer,et al.  Kinetic modeling in positron emission tomography. , 2002, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[9]  Scott McJames,et al.  Evaluation of rapid dual-tracer 62Cu-PTSM + 62Cu-ATSM PET in dogs with spontaneously occurring tumors , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Hinako Toyama,et al.  Simultaneous quantification of two brain functions with dual tracer injection in PET dynamic study , 2004 .

[11]  Cathryn M. Trott,et al.  Dual-Tracer PET Using Generalized Factor Analysis of Dynamic Sequences , 2013, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[12]  C. Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data. Generalizations , 1985, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[13]  Stephen E. Rose,et al.  Dual acquisition of 18F-FMISO and 18F-FDOPA , 2014 .

[14]  Leyun Pan,et al.  Kinetic modeling and parametric imaging with dynamic PET for oncological applications: general considerations, current clinical applications, and future perspectives , 2020, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  Quantitative analysis of dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT for measurement of lung inflammation , 2017, EJNMMI Research.

[16]  Terry Jones,et al.  History and future technical innovation in positron emission tomography , 2017, Journal of medical imaging.

[17]  R. Coleman,et al.  Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  M. Mintun,et al.  A quantitative model for the in vivo assessment of drug binding sites with positron emission tomography , 1984, Annals of neurology.

[19]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[20]  B. Hutton,et al.  Improved correction for the tissue fraction effect in lung PET/CT imaging. , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  S. Cherry,et al.  Total-Body Dynamic PET of Metastatic Cancer: First Patient Results , 2020 .

[22]  Vladimir Panin,et al.  Design and Implementation of Automated Clinical Whole Body Parametric PET With Continuous Bed Motion , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[23]  Huafeng Liu,et al.  Deep-Learning-Based Separation of a Mixture of Dual-Tracer Single-Acquisition PET Signals With Equal Half-Lives: A Simulation Study , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[24]  M. Tucci,et al.  18F-FDG Kinetics Parameters Depend on the Mechanism of Injury in Early Experimental Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  M. Reivich,et al.  THE [14C]DEOXYGLUCOSE METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF LOCAL CEREBRAL GLUCOSE UTILIZATION: THEORY, PROCEDURE, AND NORMAL VALUES IN THE CONSCIOUS AND ANESTHETIZED ALBINO RAT 1 , 1977, Journal of neurochemistry.

[26]  Jeih-San Liow,et al.  Linearized Reference Tissue Parametric Imaging Methods: Application to [11C]DASB Positron Emission Tomography Studies of the Serotonin Transporter in Human Brain , 2003, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[27]  B. Chow,et al.  18F-FDG PET Imaging of Myocardial Viability in an Experienced Center with Access to 18F-FDG and Integration with Clinical Management Teams: The Ottawa-FIVE Substudy of the PARR 2 Trial , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Total-Body Dynamic Reconstruction and Parametric Imaging on the uEXPLORER , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  J. Sosna,et al.  FDG PET/CT early dynamic blood flow and late standardized uptake value determination in hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2011, Radiology.

[30]  Miguel Castelo-Branco,et al.  Can 11C-PiB-PET Relative Delivery R1 or 11C-PiB-PET Perfusion Replace 18F-FDG-PET in the Assessment of Brain Neurodegeneration? , 2018, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[31]  J M Hoffman,et al.  Rapid dual-injection single-scan 13N-ammonia PET for quantification of rest and stress myocardial blood flows , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Uttam M. Shrestha,et al.  Dynamic cardiac PET imaging: Technological improvements advancing future cardiac health , 2019, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[33]  V. Bettinardi,et al.  Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690. , 2011, Medical physics.

[34]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Whole-body direct 4D parametric PET imaging employing nested generalized Patlak expectation–maximization reconstruction , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  Martin A Lodge,et al.  Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: I. Concept, acquisition protocol optimization and clinical application , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Whole-body parametric PET imaging will replace conventional image-derived PET metrics in clinical oncology. , 2018, Medical physics.

[37]  J. Humm,et al.  Multiparametric Imaging of Tumor Hypoxia and Perfusion with 18F-Fluoromisonidazole Dynamic PET in Head and Neck Cancer , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[38]  M. Spieth,et al.  A tabulated summary of the FDG PET literature. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[39]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Numerical observer study of lesion detectability for a long axial field-of-view whole-body PET imager using the PennPET Explorer , 2019, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  Mark Slifstein,et al.  Quantitative imaging of protein targets in the human brain with PET , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[41]  Stephen F. Carter,et al.  Dual-phase [18F]florbetapir in frontotemporal dementia , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[42]  Robert A Koeppe,et al.  Signal Separation and Parameter Estimation in Noninvasive Dual-Tracer PET Scans using Reference-Region Approaches , 2009, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[43]  Huafeng Liu,et al.  Three-dimensional convolutional neural networks for simultaneous dual-tracer PET imaging , 2019, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  C Burger,et al.  Requirements and implementation of a flexible kinetic modeling tool. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[45]  Ran Klein,et al.  Dynamic SPECT Measurement of Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow in a Porcine Model , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[46]  R. Badawi,et al.  Dynamic PET of human liver inflammation: impact of kinetic modeling with optimization-derived dual-blood input function , 2018, bioRxiv.

[47]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Tracer Kinetic Modeling in PET. , 2007, PET clinics.

[48]  Fotis A. Kotasidis,et al.  Advanced kinetic modelling strategies: towards adoption in clinical PET imaging , 2014, Clinical and Translational Imaging.

[49]  S. Kety,et al.  THE NITROUS OXIDE METHOD FOR THE QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW IN MAN: THEORY, PROCEDURE AND NORMAL VALUES. , 1948, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[50]  S. Resnick,et al.  Longitudinal evaluation of surrogates of regional cerebral blood flow computed from dynamic amyloid PET imaging , 2020, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[51]  Oscar L Lopez,et al.  Relative 11C-PiB Delivery as a Proxy of Relative CBF: Quantitative Evaluation Using Single-Session 15O-Water and 11C-PiB PET , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[53]  Hongcheng Shi,et al.  Performance characteristics of the digital uMI550 PET/CT system according to the NEMA NU2-2018 standard , 2020, EJNMMI Physics.

[54]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Direct Parametric Image Reconstruction in Reduced Parameter Space for Rapid Multi-Tracer PET Imaging , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[55]  J. Foster,et al.  Gut–brain axis: how the microbiome influences anxiety and depression , 2013, Trends in Neurosciences.

[56]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Direct Estimation of Kinetic Parametric Images for Dynamic PET , 2013, Theranostics.

[57]  N. Dowson,et al.  Design and utilisation of protocols to characterise dynamic PET uptake of two tracers using basis pursuit , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[58]  Baixuan Xu,et al.  Simplified Protocol for Whole Body Patlak Parametric Imaging with 18 F-FDG PET/CT: Feasibility and Error Analysis. , 2020, Medical physics.

[59]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Update on Time-of-Flight PET Imaging , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[60]  M. Tucci,et al.  Assessment of lung inflammation with 18F-FDG PET during acute lung injury. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[61]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Quantification of Lung PET Images: Challenges and Opportunities , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[62]  S. Moore,et al.  Clinical Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[63]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Vereos PET/CT System According to the NEMA NU2-2012 Standard , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[64]  Arkadiusz Sitek,et al.  Comparison and Prognostic Validation of Multiple Methods of Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow with 82Rb PET , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[65]  A. Wree,et al.  From NAFLD to NASH to cirrhosis—new insights into disease mechanisms , 2013, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology.

[66]  Vincent J. Cunningham,et al.  Parametric Imaging of Ligand-Receptor Binding in PET Using a Simplified Reference Region Model , 1997, NeuroImage.

[67]  E. Hoffman,et al.  TOMOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT OF LOCAL CEREBRAL GLUCOSE METABOLIC RATE IN HUMANS WITH (F‐18)2‐FLUORO-2‐DEOXY-D‐GLUCOSE: VALIDATION OF METHOD , 1980, Annals of neurology.

[68]  J. S. Karp,et al.  Recent developments in time-of-flight PET , 2016, EJNMMI Physics.

[69]  T. Yen,et al.  Correlation of early-phase 18F-florbetapir (AV-45/Amyvid) PET images to FDG images: preliminary studies , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[70]  Guobao Wang,et al.  PET Image Reconstruction Using Kernel Method , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[71]  Georges El Fakhri,et al.  Single-scan rest∕stress imaging (18)F-labeled flow tracers. , 2012, Medical physics.

[72]  Nizar A. Mullani,et al.  Tumor Blood Flow Measured by PET Dynamic Imaging of First-Pass 18F-FDG Uptake: A Comparison with 15O-Labeled Water-Measured Blood Flow , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[73]  Tinsu Pan,et al.  Performance evaluation of the 5-Ring GE Discovery MI PET/CT system using the national electrical manufacturers association NU 2-2012 Standard. , 2019, Medical physics.

[74]  D. Berman,et al.  Clinical Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow Using PET: Joint Position Paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[75]  J. Martí-Climent,et al.  Dual Tracer 11C-Choline and FDG-PET in the Diagnosis of Biochemical Prostate Cancer Relapse After Radical Treatment , 2010, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[76]  Robert B. Innis,et al.  Strategies to Improve Neuroreceptor Parameter Estimation by Linear Regression Analysis , 2002, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[77]  A. Diehl,et al.  NAFLD, NASH and liver cancer , 2013, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology.

[78]  Joel S Karp,et al.  PennPET Explorer: Human Imaging on a Whole-Body Imager , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[79]  Sung-Cheng Huang,et al.  Anatomy of SUV , 2000 .

[80]  Alexandre Cochet,et al.  Evaluation of Breast Tumor Blood Flow with Dynamic First-Pass 18F-FDG PET/CT: Comparison with Angiogenesis Markers and Prognostic Factors , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[81]  A. Villringer,et al.  Dual Time-Point [18F]Florbetaben PET Delivers Dual Biomarker Information in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease. , 2018, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[82]  W. Moses,et al.  Total-Body PET: Maximizing Sensitivity to Create New Opportunities for Clinical Research and Patient Care , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[83]  M. Lepage,et al.  Determination of an Optimal Pharmacokinetic Model of 18F-FET for Quantitative Applications in Rat Brain Tumors , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[84]  Ove Almkvist,et al.  Comparison of Early-Phase 11C-Deuterium-l-Deprenyl and 11C-Pittsburgh Compound B PET for Assessing Brain Perfusion in Alzheimer Disease , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[85]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Dynamic whole-body PET imaging: principles, potentials and applications , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[86]  Richard E. Carson,et al.  Parametric Imaging With PET and SPECT , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[87]  G. Fink,et al.  Potential of Early [18F]-2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography for Identifying Hypoperfusion and Predicting Fate of Tissue in a Rat Embolic Stroke Model , 2012, Stroke.

[88]  Venkatesh L. Murthy,et al.  Clinical Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow Using PET: Joint Position Paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC , 2017, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[89]  Michael E Casey,et al.  Complementary frame reconstruction: a low-biased dynamic PET technique for low count density data in projection space. , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[90]  Piotr J. Slomka,et al.  Comparison of Clinical Tools for Measurements of Regional Stress and Rest Myocardial Blood Flow Assessed with 13N-Ammonia PET/CT , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[91]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Simplified Reference Tissue Model for PET Receptor Studies , 1996, NeuroImage.

[92]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  Characterization of PET/CT images using texture analysis: the past, the present… any future? , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[93]  A. Padhani,et al.  Multiparametric imaging of tumor response to therapy. , 2010, Radiology.

[94]  W. M. van der Flier,et al.  Tau pathology and relative cerebral blood flow are independently associated with cognition in Alzheimer’s disease , 2020, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[95]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Performance Characteristics of the Digital Biograph Vision PET/CT System , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[96]  Vishwa Parekh,et al.  Radiomics: a new application from established techniques , 2016, Expert review of precision medicine and drug development.

[97]  C S Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data , 1983, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[98]  Kewei Chen,et al.  Image-Derived Input Function for Brain PET Studies: Many Challenges and Few Opportunities , 2011, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[99]  R. Wahl,et al.  Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow--clinical and research applications. , 2014, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[100]  S. Gunn,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography Compartmental Models , 2001, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[101]  D.J. Kadrmas,et al.  Feasibility of rapid multitracer PET tumor imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[102]  V J Cunningham,et al.  Compartmental Analysis of Diprenorphine Binding to Opiate Receptors in the Rat in vivo and its Comparison with Equilibrium Data in vitro , 1991, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[103]  David Dagan Feng,et al.  Noninvasive Input Function Acquisition and Simultaneous Estimations With Physiological Parameters for PET Quantification: A Brief Review , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[104]  Arkadiusz Sitek,et al.  EM reconstruction of Dual Isotope PET with staggered injections and prompt gamma positron emitters , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[105]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Four-dimensional (4D) image reconstruction strategies in dynamic PET: beyond conventional independent frame reconstruction. , 2009, Medical physics.

[106]  Alexandre Cochet,et al.  Breast Cancer Blood Flow and Metabolism on Dual-Acquisition 18F-FDG PET: Correlation with Tumor Phenotype and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[107]  S. Gambhir Molecular imaging of cancer with positron emission tomography , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[108]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Total Body PET: Why, How, What for? , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[109]  Jan Pruim,et al.  Comparison of image-derived and arterial input functions for estimating the rate of glucose metabolism in therapy-monitoring 18F-FDG PET studies. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[110]  F. O’Sullivan,et al.  Hypoxia and Glucose Metabolism in Malignant Tumors , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[111]  Quanzheng Li,et al.  18F-Alfatide II and 18F-FDG Dual-Tracer Dynamic PET for Parametric, Early Prediction of Tumor Response to Therapy , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[112]  Mary E Rinella,et al.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review. , 2015, JAMA.

[113]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  Deep Learning for PET Image Reconstruction , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[114]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Acceleration of the direct reconstruction of linear parametric images using nested algorithms , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[115]  C. Broeckhoven,et al.  18F-FDG PET, the early phases and the delivery rate of 18F-AV45 PET as proxies of cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer's disease: Validation against 15O-H2O PET , 2019, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[116]  Dan J. Kadrmas,et al.  Methodology for Quantitative Rapid Multi-Tracer PET Tumor Characterizations , 2013, Theranostics.

[117]  T. Jones,et al.  Spectral Analysis of Dynamic PET Studies , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[118]  K. Knešaurek,et al.  SUV/Patlak-4D whole-body PET/CT dynamic and parametric imaging: clinical demonstration and validation of SUV synthesis from dynamic passes , 2017, 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[119]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Assessment of Lesion Detectability in Dynamic Whole-Body PET Imaging Using Compartmental and Patlak Parametric Mapping , 2020, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[120]  Roger N Gunn,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography Compartmental Models: A Basis Pursuit Strategy for Kinetic Modeling , 2002, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[121]  R. Geocadin,et al.  Heart-Brain Axis: Effects of Neurologic Injury on Cardiovascular Function. , 2017, Circulation research.

[122]  F. Hofheinz,et al.  Comparison of Static and Dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT for Quantification of Pulmonary Inflammation in Acute Lung Injury , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[123]  Susanne Keiding,et al.  Bringing Physiology into PET of the Liver , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[124]  Pengcheng Hu,et al.  First Human Imaging Studies with the EXPLORER Total-Body PET Scanner* , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[125]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Relative cerebral flow from dynamic PIB scans as an alternative for FDG scans in Alzheimer’s disease PET studies , 2019, PloS one.

[126]  F. Mortensen,et al.  Hepatic Blood Perfusion Measured by 3-Minute Dynamic 18F-FDG PET in Pigs , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[127]  D L Alexoff,et al.  A Strategy for Removing the Bias in the Graphical Analysis Method , 2001, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[128]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  Simultaneous water activation and glucose metabolic rate imaging with PET , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[129]  Dan J Kadrmas,et al.  Application of separable parameter space techniques to multi-tracer PET compartment modeling , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[130]  El Mostafa Fadaili,et al.  Comparison of Eight Methods for the Estimation of the Image-Derived Input Function in Dynamic [18F]-FDG PET Human Brain Studies , 2009, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[131]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  Machine Learning in PET: From Photon Detection to Quantitative Image Reconstruction , 2020, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[132]  Michael Charlton,et al.  The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases , 2018, Hepatology.

[133]  D J Kadrmas,et al.  Rapid dual-tracer PTSM+ATSM PET imaging of tumour blood flow and hypoxia: a simulation study , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[134]  Guobao Wang,et al.  High Temporal-Resolution Dynamic PET Image Reconstruction Using A New Spatiotemporal Kernel Method , 2018, bioRxiv.

[135]  Y Yonekura,et al.  An introduction to PET and SPECT neuroreceptor quantification models. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[136]  D E Kuhl,et al.  Dual-[11C]Tracer Single-Acquisition Positron Emission Tomography Studies , 2001, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[137]  Xuezhu Zhang,et al.  Subsecond total-body imaging using ultrasensitive positron emission tomography , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[138]  J. Keyes SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[139]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Quantifying Bias and Precision of Kinetic Parameter Estimation on the PennPET Explorer, a Long Axial Field-of-View Scanner , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[140]  Hiroshi Watabe,et al.  Rapid Quantitative Measurement of CMRO2 and CBF by Dual Administration of 15O-Labeled Oxygen and Water During a Single PET Scan—a Validation Study and Error Analysis in Anesthetized Monkeys , 2005, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.