Assessment of Patient Satisfaction With Evaluation Methods in Open Technique Septorhinoplasty.

Abstract The aim of this study was to measure the postoperative satisfaction of patients who underwent open technique septorhinoplasty (SRP) using Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation (NOSE), Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) and visual analog scale (VAS), and to assess the reliability and usability of these forms in the outcome of SRP.Forty-five patients who underwent primary open technique SRP were included in the study. The levels of patient satisfaction were assessed before the surgery and in the long-term using NOSE, ROE, and VAS.Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation scores were found to be decreased significantly after surgery, whereas ROE scores were increased postoperatively (P 0.05).There was a statistically significant positive relationship between ROE difference before and after surgery, and functional VAS difference (r = 0.544, P = 0.001).There was a positive correlation between pre-postoperative ROE difference, and aesthetic VAS difference (r = 0.766, P = 0.001). The relationship between the pre-postoperative NOSE score difference and functional VAS difference was found to be significantly negative (r = -0.833, P = 0.001). The relationship between pre-postoperative NOSE difference and aesthetic VAS difference was also significantly negative (r = -0.475, P = 0.001). There was a significant negative correlation between ROE difference between before and after surgery, and NOSE difference (r = -0.640, P = 0.00).The disease-specific quality of life assessment forms used to evaluate patient esthetic and functional satisfaction correlate significantly with nasal obstruction and ROE.

[1]  F. Oghan,et al.  Comparative analysis of nasal deformities according to patient satisfaction. , 2014, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[2]  C. Polanczyk,et al.  Vertical Dome Division , 2012, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[3]  A. Younes,et al.  Cosmetics and function: Quality‐of‐Life changes after rhinoplasty surgery , 2012, The Laryngoscope.

[4]  R. Tiago,et al.  Crooked nose: outcome evaluations in rhinoplasty , 2011, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology.

[5]  I. Baumann Quality of life before and after septoplasty and rhinoplasty , 2011, GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery.

[6]  W. Anselmo-Lima,et al.  Long-Term Evaluation in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty in an Academic Referral Center , 2010, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology.

[7]  I. Baumann [Quality of life before and after septoplasty and rhinoplasty]. , 2010, Laryngo- rhino- otologie.

[8]  Fikret Kasapoğlu,et al.  Septorinoplasti Sonrasi Hasta Memnuniyetinin Değerlendirilmesi , 2009 .

[9]  Judy W. Lee,et al.  Trends in functional rhinoplasty 2008 , 2009, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[10]  E. Taş,et al.  [Evaluation of septoplasty patients with health status scale, rhinomanometry and computed tomography]. , 2008, Kulak burun bogaz ihtisas dergisi : KBB = Journal of ear, nose, and throat.

[11]  M. Dennis,et al.  Impact of cosmetic facial surgery on satisfaction with appearance and quality of life. , 2008, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[12]  P. Hellings,et al.  Long‐Term Patient Satisfaction After Revision Rhinoplasty , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[13]  K. James,et al.  Comparison of Anatomic, Physiological, and Subjective Measures of the Nasal Airway , 2006, American journal of rhinology.

[14]  Sam P. Most Analysis of outcomes after functional rhinoplasty using a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument. , 2006, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[15]  I. Konstantinidis,et al.  Long term results following nasal septal surgery. Focus on patients' satisfaction. , 2005, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[16]  Michael G. Stewart,et al.  Development and Validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale1 , 2004, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[17]  Stephen S. Park,et al.  Preoperative analysis and diagnosis for rhinoplasty. , 2003, Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America.

[18]  K. Phillips,et al.  Does cosmetic surgery improve psychosocial wellbeing? , 2002, The Medical journal of Australia.

[19]  R. Alsarraf Outcomes Instruments in Facial Plastic Surgery , 2002, Facial plastic surgery : FPS.

[20]  W. Larrabee,et al.  Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study. , 2001, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[21]  R. Alsarraf,et al.  Outcomes Research in Facial Plastic Surgery: A Review and New Directions , 2000, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[22]  B. Guyuron,et al.  Patient satisfaction following rhinoplasty , 1996, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[23]  M. Zileli,et al.  Visual Analog Patient Satisfaction Scale , 2006 .

[24]  G. Banfield,et al.  Patient benefit from functional and cosmetic rhinoplasty. , 2001, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[25]  M J Buxton,et al.  Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[26]  A. Carr,et al.  Primary total hip replacement surgery: a systematic review of outcomes and modelling of cost-effectiveness associated with different prostheses. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[27]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Patients' health related quality of life before and after aesthetic surgery. , 1996, British journal of plastic surgery.