Protein-protein docking: from interaction to interactome.

The protein-protein docking problem is one of the focal points of activity in computational biophysics and structural biology. The three-dimensional structure of a protein-protein complex, generally, is more difficult to determine experimentally than the structure of an individual protein. Adequate computational techniques to model protein interactions are important because of the growing number of known protein structures, particularly in the context of structural genomics. Docking offers tools for fundamental studies of protein interactions and provides a structural basis for drug design. Protein-protein docking is the prediction of the structure of the complex, given the structures of the individual proteins. In the heart of the docking methodology is the notion of steric and physicochemical complementarity at the protein-protein interface. Originally, mostly high-resolution, experimentally determined (primarily by x-ray crystallography) protein structures were considered for docking. However, more recently, the focus has been shifting toward lower-resolution modeled structures. Docking approaches have to deal with the conformational changes between unbound and bound structures, as well as the inaccuracies of the interacting modeled structures, often in a high-throughput mode needed for modeling of large networks of protein interactions. The growing number of docking developers is engaged in the community-wide assessments of predictive methodologies. The development of more powerful and adequate docking approaches is facilitated by rapidly expanding information and data resources, growing computational capabilities, and a deeper understanding of the fundamental principles of protein interactions.

[1]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Fast and accurate modeling of protein–protein interactions by combining template‐interface‐based docking with flexible refinement , 2012, Proteins.

[2]  M. Levitt Nature of the protein universe , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Large‐scale characteristics of the energy landscape in protein–protein interactions , 2008, Proteins.

[4]  M. Pincus,et al.  Conformational Energy Calculations of Enzyme-Substrate and Enzyme-Inhibitor Complexes of Lysozyme. 2. Calculation of the Structures of Complexes with a Flexible Enzyme , 1979 .

[5]  Marc Baaden,et al.  Coarse-grain modelling of protein-protein interactions. , 2013, Current opinion in structural biology.

[6]  Andrei L. Turinsky,et al.  Protein-protein interaction networks: the puzzling riches. , 2013, Current opinion in structural biology.

[7]  Andrey Tovchigrechko,et al.  The size of the intermolecular energy funnel in protein–protein interactions , 2008, Proteins.

[8]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  HingeProt: Automated prediction of hinges in protein structures , 2008, Proteins.

[9]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  L. T. Ten Eyck,et al.  Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[11]  J. Janin,et al.  Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  D Fischer,et al.  Surface motifs by a computer vision technique: Searches, detection, and implications for protein–ligand recognition , 1993, Proteins.

[13]  Marc F Lensink,et al.  Docking, scoring, and affinity prediction in CAPRI , 2013, Proteins.

[14]  Ron Elber,et al.  A method for determining reaction paths in large molecules: application to myoglobin , 1987 .

[15]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Rotamer libraries and probabilities of transition between rotamers for the side chains in protein–protein binding , 2012, Proteins.

[16]  C. Aflalo,et al.  Hydrophobic docking: A proposed enhancement to molecular recognition techniques , 1994, Proteins.

[17]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Protein–protein docking benchmark version 4.0 , 2010, Proteins.

[18]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  Sampling and scoring: A marriage made in heaven , 2013, Proteins.

[19]  Frank Alber,et al.  A structural perspective on protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[20]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Variable interactions between protein crowders and biomolecular solutes are important in understanding cellular crowding. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[21]  Hui Lu,et al.  MULTIPROSPECTOR: An algorithm for the prediction of protein–protein interactions by multimeric threading , 2002, Proteins.

[22]  J. Skolnick,et al.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[23]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Structural templates for modeling homodimers , 2013, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[24]  Emil Alexov,et al.  omology-based modeling of 3 D structures of protein – protein complexes using lignments of modified sequence profiles etras , 2008 .

[25]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Template-based structure modeling of protein-protein interactions. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.

[26]  P. Bates,et al.  Modeling protein association mechanisms and kinetics. , 2013, Current opinion in structural biology.

[27]  Roland L Dunbrack,et al.  Minimal ensembles of side chain conformers for modeling protein–protein interactions , 2012, Proteins.

[28]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Capillarity theory for the fly-casting mechanism , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Michel Sanner,et al.  Shape complementarity of protein–protein complexes at multiple resolutions , 2009, Proteins.

[30]  H A Scheraga,et al.  CONFORMATIONAL ENERGY CALCULATIONS OF ENZYME‐SUBSTRATE INTERACTIONS. II. Computation of the Binding Energy for Substrates in the Active Site of α‐Chymotrypsin , 2009 .

[31]  Andras Fiser,et al.  Trends in structural coverage of the protein universe and the impact of the Protein Structure Initiative , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Anna Tramontano,et al.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP) — round x , 2014, Proteins.

[33]  A. Tramontano,et al.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—round IX , 2011, Proteins.

[34]  Ying Gao,et al.  DOCKGROUND protein-protein docking decoy set , 2008, Bioinform..

[35]  Andreas Hoppe,et al.  Docking without docking: ISEARCH—prediction of interactions using known interfaces , 2007, Proteins.

[36]  Ilya A. Vakser,et al.  A simple shape characteristic of protein-protein recognition , 2007, Bioinform..

[37]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Coarse-graining of multiprotein assemblies. , 2012, Current opinion in structural biology.

[38]  I. Vakser,et al.  A systematic study of low-resolution recognition in protein--protein complexes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Low-resolution structural modeling of protein interactome. , 2013, Current opinion in structural biology.

[40]  J. Skolnick,et al.  On the origin and highly likely completeness of single-domain protein structures. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Global and local structural similarity in protein–protein complexes: Implications for template‐based docking , 2013, Proteins.

[42]  Rohita Sinha,et al.  Docking by structural similarity at protein‐protein interfaces , 2010, Proteins.

[43]  Juan Fernández-Recio,et al.  Pushing Structural Information into the Yeast Interactome by High-Throughput Protein Docking Experiments , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  Z. Weng,et al.  Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction , 2007, Proteins.

[45]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Chasing funnels on protein-protein energy landscapes at different resolutions. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[46]  M. Pincus,et al.  Prediction of three-dimensional structures of enzyme-substrate and enzyme-inhibitor complexes of lysozyme. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  J. S. Dixon,et al.  Evaluation of the CASP2 docking section , 1997, Proteins.

[48]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  Encounter complexes and dimensionality reduction in protein–protein association , 2014, eLife.

[49]  Stephen R. Comeau,et al.  PIPER: An FFT‐based protein docking program with pairwise potentials , 2006, Proteins.

[50]  Ying Gao,et al.  Large-Scale Structural Modeling of protein complexes at Low Resolution , 2008, J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol..

[51]  B. Honig,et al.  Structure-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genome-wide scale , 2012, Nature.

[52]  David W. Ritchie,et al.  Spatial clustering of protein binding sites for template based protein docking , 2011, Bioinform..

[53]  R. Russell,et al.  The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[54]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Protein models: The Grand Challenge of protein docking , 2014, Proteins.

[55]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Side-chain conformational changes upon Protein-Protein Association. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[56]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Sequence composition and environment effects on residue fluctuations in protein structures. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[57]  Dominique Douguet,et al.  DOCKGROUND system of databases for protein recognition studies: Unbound structures for docking , 2007, Proteins.

[58]  James R Faeder,et al.  Toward a quantitative theory of intrinsically disordered proteins and their function , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  B. Bush,et al.  Macromolecular shape and surface maps by solvent exclusion. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  I. Vakser,et al.  Main-chain complementarity in protein-protein recognition. , 1996, Protein engineering.

[61]  I. Vakser Protein docking for low-resolution structures. , 1995, Protein engineering.

[62]  Zhengwei Zhu,et al.  Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  Tirso Pons,et al.  Towards a detailed atlas of protein-protein interactions. , 2013, Current opinion in structural biology.

[64]  I A Vakser Long-distance potentials: an approach to the multiple-minima problem in ligand-receptor interaction. , 1996, Protein engineering.

[65]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Mapping Monomeric Threading to Protein-Protein Structure Prediction , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[66]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Protein–protein alternative binding modes do not overlap , 2013, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[67]  I. Vakser,et al.  Evaluation of GRAMM low‐resolution docking methodology on the hemagglutinin‐antibody complex , 1997, Proteins.

[68]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  Modeling of protein interactions in genomes , 2002, Proteins.

[69]  R Sánchez,et al.  Advances in comparative protein-structure modelling. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[70]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Molecular origins of binding affinity: seeking the Archimedean point. , 2013, Current opinion in structural biology.

[71]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Docking of protein models , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[72]  Xiakun Chu,et al.  Quantifying the topography of the intrinsic energy landscape of flexible biomolecular recognition , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[73]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Human proteome-scale structural modeling of E2-E3 interactions exploiting interface motifs. , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[74]  I. Vakser,et al.  How common is the funnel‐like energy landscape in protein‐protein interactions? , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[75]  A. Bordogna,et al.  Defining the limits of homology modeling in information‐driven protein docking , 2013, Proteins.

[76]  S. Wodak The structure of cytidilyl(2',5')adenosine when bound to pancreatic ribonuclease S. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[77]  Petras J. Kundrotas,et al.  Accuracy of Protein-Protein Binding Sites in High-Throughput Template-Based Modeling , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[78]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Ensemble‐based characterization of unbound and bound states on protein energy landscape , 2012, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[79]  E. Katchalski‐Katzir,et al.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[80]  Dominique Douguet,et al.  DOCKGROUND resource for studying protein-protein interfaces , 2006, Bioinform..

[81]  Mark N. Wass,et al.  Challenges for the prediction of macromolecular interactions. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.