Geodesic topological analysis of trabecular bone microarchitecture from high‐spatial resolution magnetic resonance images

In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture could improve the prediction of fracture risk and the efficacy of osteoporosis treatment and prevention. Geodesic topological analysis (GTA) is introduced as a novel technique to quantify the trabecular bone microarchitecture from high‐spatial resolution magnetic resonance (MR) images. Trabecular bone parameters that quantify the scale, topology, and anisotropy of the trabecular bone network in terms of its junctions are the result of GTA. The reproducibility of GTA was tested with in vivo images of human distal tibiae and radii (n = 6) at 1.5 Tesla; and its ability to discriminate between subjects with and without vertebral fracture was assessed with ex vivo images of human calcanei at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla (n = 30). GTA parameters yielded an average reproducibility of 4.8%, and their individual areas under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for fracture discrimination performed better at 3.0 than at 1.5 Tesla reaching values of up to 0.78 (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that fracture discrimination was improved by combining GTA parameters, and that GTA combined with bone mineral density (BMD) allow for better discrimination than BMD alone (AUC = 0.95; p < 0.001). Results indicate that GTA can substantially contribute in studies of osteoporosis involving imaging of the trabecular bone microarchitecture. Magn Reson Med 61:448–456, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Thomas M. Link,et al.  The Effects of Geometric and Threshold Definitions on Cortical Bone Metrics Assessed by In Vivo High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography , 2007, Calcified Tissue International.

[2]  D. Newitt,et al.  Effects of Salmon Calcitonin on Trabecular Microarchitecture as Determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Results From the QUEST Study , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[3]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Correlation of Trabecular Bone Structure with Age, Bone Mineral Density, and Osteoporotic Status: In Vivo Studies in the Distal Radius Using High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Processing and Analysis of In Vivo High-Resolution MR Images of Trabecular Bone for Longitudinal Studies: Reproducibility of Structural Measures and Micro-Finite Element Analysis Derived Mechanical Properties , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[5]  G. Beaupré,et al.  Interpretation of Calcaneus Dual‐Energy X‐Ray Absorptiometry Measurements in the Assessment of Osteopenia and Fracture Risk , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  Volker Kuhn,et al.  Sex Differences of Human Trabecular Bone Microstructure in Aging Are Site‐Dependent , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  S. Majumdar,et al.  In Vivo Determination of Bone Structure in Postmenopausal Women: A Comparison of HR‐pQCT and High‐Field MR Imaging , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  W. J. Whitehouse The quantitative morphology of anisotropic trabecular bone , 1974, Journal of microscopy.

[9]  S. Majumdar,et al.  New imaging technologies in the diagnosis of osteoporosis , 2007, Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders.

[10]  Punam K. Saha,et al.  Three-dimensional digital topological characterization of cancellous bone architecture , 2000, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[11]  G. A. Ladinsky,et al.  Trabecular Structure Quantified With the MRI‐Based Virtual Bone Biopsy in Postmenopausal Women Contributes to Vertebral Deformity Burden Independent of Areal Vertebral BMD , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  J. Macneil,et al.  Accuracy of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography for measurement of bone quality. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  M. Jergas,et al.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[14]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Assessment of trabecular bone structure comparing magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography ex vivo and in vivo , 2008, Osteoporosis International.

[15]  Steven K Boyd,et al.  Automatic segmentation of cortical and trabecular compartments based on a dual threshold technique for in vivo micro-CT bone analysis. , 2007, Bone.

[16]  Dwight G Nishimura,et al.  Designing long‐T2 suppression pulses for ultrashort echo time imaging , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  S. Majumdar Magnetic resonance imaging for osteoporosis , 2008, Skeletal Radiology.

[18]  Dwight G Nishimura,et al.  Using adiabatic inversion pulses for long‐T2 suppression in ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Ching Y. Suen,et al.  Thinning Methodologies - A Comprehensive Survey , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[20]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  Clinical utility of microarchitecture measurements of trabecular bone , 2006, Current osteoporosis reports.

[21]  Bidyut Baran Chaudhuri,et al.  3D Digital Topology under Binary Transformation with Applications , 1996, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[22]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. , 2005, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[23]  F. Wehrli Structural and functional assessment of trabecular and cortical bone by micro magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  A. Wright,et al.  Quantitative MRI for the assessment of bone structure and function , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[25]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  Characterization of trabecular bone structure from high-resolution magnetic resonance images using fuzzy logic. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[26]  M. Nevitt,et al.  Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique , 1993, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  F W Wehrli,et al.  Reproducibility and error sources of micro-MRI-based trabecular bone structural parameters of the distal radius and tibia. , 2004, Bone.

[28]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Assessment of trabecular structure using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[29]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. , 1983, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[30]  Punam K. Saha,et al.  A robust method for measuring trabecular bone orientation anisotropy at in vivo resolution using tensor scale , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[31]  Thomas M. Link,et al.  Fuzzy Logic Structure Analysis of Trabecular Bone of the Calcaneus to Estimate Proximal Femur Fracture Load and Discriminate Subjects with and without Vertebral Fractures using High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T , 2007, Calcified Tissue International.

[32]  H Weinans,et al.  Cancellous bone mechanical properties from normals and patients with hip fractures differ on the structure level, not on the bone hard tissue level. , 2002, Bone.

[33]  Marion Kee,et al.  Analysis , 2004, Machine Translation.

[34]  Felix W Wehrli,et al.  In vivo MRI of submillisecond T2 species with two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional radial sequences and applications to the measurement of cortical bone water , 2008, NMR in biomedicine.

[35]  Claude Laurent Benhamou,et al.  Imaging techniques for evaluating bone microarchitecture. , 2006, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[36]  G. A. Ladinsky,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of bone microarchitecture by MRI , 2006, Current osteoporosis reports.

[37]  Punam K. Saha,et al.  Topological analysis of trabecular bone MR images , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.