Residual biomass recovery from fully-mechanized delayed thinnings on Spanish Pinus spp. plantations

Abstract In Spain, five million hectares of conifer plantations require thinning. As only a small part produces pulpwood, they are a major potential biomass resource. A time-study is performed on the recovery of logging residues in a Pinus plantation on gentle terrain in order to analyze the main factors affecting the productivity and cost of biomass and pulpwood harvesting. The first factor is the branches and tops piling method, either using the forest harvester head to bunch them along the strip road sides (method S) while processing the timber, or leaving them on the strip road centre (method C) and using a 175 HP bulldozer with a raking implement to pile them up afterwards. The second factor is the top diameter separating pulpwood and biomass, 8 or 10 cm. Mechanized felling-processing productivity is greater for the method C and the smaller diameter. Hauling biomass off with forwarder is also significantly more productive when piled by bulldozer. Productivity equations were fitted for pulpwood and biomass forwarding. The direct cost of biomass recovery ranged from €29.7 to €31.5 per green tonne ( H  = 51%). The roundwood and biomass effective yields – per hectare – were measured. This allowed evaluating the cost balance for roundwood/roundwood plus biomass harvesting, based on the net income per hectare. Under the 2013 Spanish market conditions, recovery of residual biomass is economically preferable to harvesting only roundwood in the studied stands. The greater net income balance corresponds to the piling method using the bulldozer (C) and the larger top diameter (10 cm).

[1]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  A Low-Investment Fully Mechanized Operation for Pure Selection Thinning of Pine Plantations , 2009 .

[2]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Comparison of two harvesting systems for the production of forest biomass from the thinning of Picea abies plantations , 2010 .

[3]  Han-Sup Han,et al.  Productivity and cost of cut-to-length and whole-tree harvesting in a mixed-conifer stand , 2007 .

[4]  Juha Nurmi,et al.  Recovery of logging residues for energy from spruce (Pices abies) dominated stands , 2007 .

[5]  Michael A. Thompson,et al.  AN INTERNATIONAL NOMENCLATURE FOR FOREST WORK STUDY , 2000 .

[6]  Yolanda Ambrosio,et al.  Productivity and cost of biomass harvesting for energy production in coppice natural stands of Quercus pyrenaica Willd. in central Spain. , 2013 .

[7]  Yolanda Ambrosio,et al.  Recovering of forest biomass from Spanish hybrid poplar plantations , 2011 .

[8]  Francisco G. Montoya,et al.  Renewable energy production in Spain: A review , 2014 .

[9]  Dan Bergström,et al.  Simulation of geometric thinning systems and their time requirements for young forests , 2007 .

[10]  Kalle Kärhä,et al.  Integrated harvesting of energy wood and pulpwood in first thinnings using the two-pile cutting method , 2011 .

[11]  B. Talbot,et al.  Good practice guidelines for biomass production studies , 2012 .

[12]  Unai López de Heredia,et al.  Historical and recent changes in the Spanish forests: a socio-economic process. , 2010 .

[13]  E. C. Líbano,et al.  Modelización de la biomasa arbórea y evaluación de rendimientos y costes en una clara de Pinus pinaster para la obtención de biomasa en Asturias , 2009 .