Accurate light-time correction due to a gravitating mass

This technical paper of mathematical physics arose as an aftermath of the 2002 Cassini experiment (Bertotti et al 2003 Nature 425 374–6), in which the PPN parameter γ was measured with an accuracy σγ = 2.3 × 10−5 and found consistent with the prediction γ = 1 of general relativity. The Orbit Determination Program (ODP) of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which was used in the data analysis, is based on an expression (8) for the gravitational delay Δt that differs from the standard formula (2); this difference is of second order in powers of m—the gravitational radius of the Sun—but in Cassini's case it was much larger than the expected order of magnitude m2/b, where b is the distance of the closest approach of the ray. Since the ODP does not take into account any other second-order terms, it is necessary, also in view of future more accurate experiments, to revisit the whole problem, to systematically evaluate higher order corrections and to determine which terms, and why, are larger than the expected value. We note that light propagation in a static spacetime is equivalent to a problem in ordinary geometrical optics; Fermat's action functional at its minimum is just the light-time between the two end points A and B. A new and powerful formulation is thus obtained. This method is closely connected with the much more general approach of Le Poncin-Lafitte et al (2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 4463–83), which is based on Synge's world function. Asymptotic power series are necessary to provide a safe and automatic way of selecting which terms to keep at each order. Higher order approximations to the required quantities, in particular the delay and the deflection, are easily obtained. We also show that in a close superior conjunction, when b is much smaller than the distances of A and B from the Sun, say of order R, the second-order correction has an enhanced part of order m2R/b2, which corresponds just to the second-order terms introduced in the ODP. Gravitational deflection of the image of a far away source when observed from a finite distance from the mass is obtained up to O(m2).

[1]  T. D. Moyer Formulation for Observed and Computed Values of Deep Space Network Data Types for Navigation , 2003 .

[2]  W. Ni,et al.  ASTROD I: Mission Concept and Venus Flybys , 2006 .

[3]  J. Mart́ın,et al.  Fermat's principle in General Relativity , 1994 .

[4]  L. G. Boté,et al.  Laser Interferometer Space Antenna , 2012 .

[5]  W. Ni ASTROD (Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices) and ASTROD I , 2007 .

[6]  Second-order contributions to relativistic time delay in the parametrized post-Newtonian formalism , 1983 .

[7]  Irwin I. Shapiro,et al.  Viking relativity experiment - Verification of signal retardation by solar gravity , 1979 .

[8]  Vimal Singh,et al.  Perturbation methods , 1991 .

[9]  Clifford M. Will,et al.  Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics , 1982 .

[10]  Sebastiano Ligori,et al.  GAME: Gamma Astrometric Measurement Experiment , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[11]  R. Matzner,et al.  Second-order contributions to gravitational deflection of light in the parametrized post-Newtonian formalism , 1982 .

[12]  World function and time transfer: general post-Minkowskian expansions , 2004, gr-qc/0403094.

[13]  W. Ni Mini-ASTROD --- Mini-Astrodynamical Space Test of Relativity using Optical Devices , 2003 .

[14]  Ephraim Fischbach,et al.  Second-order contribution to the gravitational deflection of light , 1980 .

[15]  P. K. Seidelmann,et al.  The IAU 2000 Resolutions for Astrometry, Celestial Mechanics, and Metrology in the Relativistic Framework: Explanatory Supplement , 2003, astro-ph/0303376.

[16]  Ignazio Ciufolini,et al.  Gravitation and Inertia , 2018 .

[17]  C. Will,et al.  Deflection of light to second order: A tool for illustrating principles of general relativity , 2003 .

[18]  B. Bertotti,et al.  Relativistic effects for Doppler measurements near solar conjunction , 1992 .

[19]  B. Bertotti,et al.  The effect of the motion of the Sun on the light-time in interplanetary relativity experiments , 2007, 0709.1512.

[20]  Clifford M. Will,et al.  Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics: Frontmatter , 1993 .

[21]  Hinch Perturbation Methods , 1991 .

[22]  C. Le Poncin-Lafitte,et al.  General post-Minkowskian expansion of time transfer functions , 2008, 0803.0277.

[23]  The angular resolution of space-based gravitational wave detectors , 2000 .

[24]  Irwin I. Shapiro,et al.  Fourth Test of General Relativity: New Radar Result , 1971 .

[25]  S. Kopeikin,et al.  Gravimagnetic effect of the barycentric motion of the Sun and determination of the post-Newtonian parameter γ in the Cassini experiment , 2006, gr-qc/0604060.

[26]  W. Welford Principles of optics (5th Edition): M. Born, E. Wolf Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975, pp xxviii + 808, £9.50 , 1975 .

[27]  Samuel,et al.  Fermat's principle in general relativity. , 1992, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[28]  Emil Wolf,et al.  Principles of Optics: Contents , 1999 .

[29]  Paolo Farinella,et al.  Physics of the Solar System: Dynamics and Evolution, Space Physics, and Spacetime Structure , 2003 .

[30]  Luciano Iess,et al.  Doppler tracking of spacecraft with multi-frequency links , 1993 .

[31]  R. Wagoner,et al.  Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity , 1973 .

[32]  A. Tan,et al.  Fermat's principle , 1985 .

[33]  P. Tortora,et al.  A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft , 2003, Nature.

[34]  I. Shapiro Fourth Test of General Relativity , 1964 .

[35]  Irwin I. Shapiro,et al.  Post-post-Newtonian deflection of light by the Sun , 1980 .