Determination of a suitable extraction equipment in mechanized longwall mining in steeply inclined coal seams using fuzzy analytical hierarchy method (Case study: Hamkar coal mine, Iran)

The longwall mining method is one of the most applied methods in extracting low-inclined to high-inclined coal seams. Selection of the most suitable extraction equipment is very important in the economical, safety, and productivity aspects of mining operations. There are a lot of parameters affecting the selection of an extraction equipment in mechanized longwall mining in steeply inclined coal seams. The important criteria involved are the geometric properties of coal seam (dip, thickness, and uniformity of coal seam), geological and hydraulic conditions (faults, fractures, joints, and underground water), and geomechanical properties of coal seam and surrounding rocks. Extraction of inclined coal seams with gradients greater than 40 degree is different from low-inclined seams, and requires a special equipment. Therefore, the influence of the above-mentioned parameters must be considered simultaneously in the selection of extraction equipment for steeply inclined seams. This paper presents an application of the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) method in order to select a suitable extraction equipment in the Hamkar coal mine. In the proposed FAHP model, fifteen main criteria are considered, as follow: dip of coal seam, thickness of coal seam, seam uniformity, expansion of coal seam, faults, fractures and joints, underground waters, hangingwall strength, footwall strength, coal strength, in-situ stress, equipment salvage, dilution, system flexibility, and operational costs. Among the 6 considered longwall extraction equipment system alternatives, the findings show that the most suitable extraction equipment system is shearer on footwall and a support system using hydraulic props and the transport of coal with the force of gravity.

[1]  F. A. Lootsma,et al.  Multicriteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons , 1989 .

[2]  J. J. Walsh,et al.  New methods of fault projection for coalmine planning , 1990 .

[3]  Ahmad Ramezanzadeh,et al.  Determination of suitable method for solution mining brine recycling using fuzzy analytical hierarchy method , 2017 .

[4]  Mohammad Ataei,et al.  The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to selection of optimum underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine, Iran , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Mohammad Ataei,et al.  Mining method selection by AHP approach , 2008 .

[6]  Atac Bascetin,et al.  Technical note: An application of the analytic hierarchy process in equipment selection at Orhaneli open pit coal mine , 2004 .

[7]  Mohammad Ataei,et al.  THE OPTIMUM SUPPORT SELECTION BY USING FUZZY ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS METHOD FOR BEHESHTABAD WATER TRANSPORTING TUNNEL IN NAIEN , 2013 .

[8]  Mahmut Yavuz,et al.  Underground mining method selection by decision making tools , 2009 .

[9]  James J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: the Lambda-Max method , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[10]  Chia-Chi Sun,et al.  A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Min-Chun Yu,et al.  Measuring Service Quality via a Fuzzy Analytical Approach , 2015, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..

[12]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Multi‐criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP , 2003 .

[13]  Mohammad Ataei,et al.  Mining method selection by multiple criteria decision making tools , 2004 .

[14]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[15]  M. K. Özfırat,et al.  A fuzzy method for selecting underground coal mining method considering mechanization criteria , 2012, Journal of Mining Science.

[16]  Fangtian Wang,et al.  Present situation of fully mechanized mining technology for steeply inclined coal seams in China , 2014, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[17]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection , 2007 .

[18]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[19]  Xin Jingmin,et al.  Fuzzy evaluation of powered support suitability to coal seams , 1990 .

[20]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  O. Acaroglu,et al.  Analytical hierarchy process for selection of roadheaders by , 2006 .

[22]  K. Goshtasbi,et al.  Shield support selection based on geometric characteristics of coal seam , 2006 .

[23]  Mohammad Ataei,et al.  Determination of coal mine mechanization using fuzzy logic , 2009 .

[24]  Irfan Ertugrul,et al.  Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..