MANAGERIAL FUNCTIONS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO TRADITIONAL ASSESSMENT CENTER DIMENSIONS?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] James W. Smither,et al. AN EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECTS OF USING BEHAVIOR CHECKLISTS ON THE CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT CENTER DIMENSIONS , 1990 .
[2] D. P. Baker,et al. Construct validity of in-basket scores , 1989 .
[3] P. Bycio,et al. Situational specificity in assessment center ratings: A confirmatory factor analysis. , 1987 .
[4] George C. Thornton,et al. Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. , 1987 .
[5] Richard J. Klimoski,et al. WHY DO ASSESSMENT CENTERS WORK? THE PUZZLE OF ASSESSMENT CENTER VALIDITY , 1987 .
[6] A. Dalessio,et al. INFLUENCE OF ASSESSMENT CENTER METHODS ON ASSESSORS’RATINGS , 1986 .
[7] Michael P. Kirsch,et al. METAANALYSES OF VALIDITY STUDIES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1964 AND 1982 AND THE INVESTIGATION OF STUDY CHARACTERISTICS , 1984 .
[8] Richard D. Neidig,et al. Multiple assessment center exercises and job relatedness. , 1984 .
[9] P. Sackett,et al. Situation specificity of behavior and assessment center validation strategies: a rejoinder to Neidig and Neidig , 1984 .
[10] Janet J. Turnage,et al. Transsituational variability in human performance within assessment centers , 1982 .
[11] Paul R. Sackett,et al. Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings , 1982 .
[12] R. Klimoski,et al. ASSESSMENT CENTERS—VALID OR MERELY PRESCIENT , 1977 .
[13] D. Campbell,et al. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.