Sustainability, collapse and oscillations in a simple World-Earth model

The Anthropocene is characterized by close interdependencies between the natural Earth system and the global human society, posing novel challenges to model development. Here we present a conceptual model describing the long-term co-evolution of natural and socio-economic subsystems of Earth. While the climate is represented via a global carbon cycle, we use economic concepts to model socio-metabolic flows of biomass and fossil fuels between nature and society. A well-being-dependent parametrization of fertility and mortality governs human population dynamics. Our analysis focuses on assessing possible asymptotic states of the Earth system for a qualitative understanding of its complex dynamics rather than quantitative predictions. Low dimension and simple equations enable a parameter-space analysis allowing us to identify preconditions of several asymptotic states and hence fates of humanity and planet. These include a sustainable co-evolution of nature and society, a global collapse and everlasting oscillations. We consider different scenarios corresponding to different socio-cultural stages of human history. The necessity of accounting for the 'human factor' in Earth system models is highlighted by the finding that carbon stocks during the past centuries evolved opposing to what would 'naturally' be expected on a planet without humans. The intensity of biomass use and the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being are found to be crucial determinants of the asymptotic state in a (pre-industrial) biomass-only scenario without capital accumulation. The capitalistic, fossil-based scenario reveals that trajectories with fundamentally different asymptotic states might still be almost indistinguishable during even a centuries-long transient phase. Given current human population levels, our study also supports the claim that besides reducing the global demand for energy, only the extensive use of renewable energies may pave the way into a sustainable future.

[1]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles , 2014 .

[2]  H. J. Schellnhuber,et al.  Discourse: Earth System Analysis — The Scope of the Challenge , 1998 .

[3]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Methods and approaches to modelling the Anthropocene , 2016 .

[4]  M. Maslin,et al.  Defining the Anthropocene , 2015, Nature.

[5]  Jan Zalasiewicz,et al.  The Anthropocene: a new epoch of geological time? , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene , 2016, Science.

[8]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[9]  Peter McKendry,et al.  Energy production from biomass (Part 1): Overview of biomass. , 2002, Bioresource technology.

[10]  John E. Koehler,et al.  The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind . By Donella H. Meadows, Dennis L. Meadows, Jørgen Randers, William W. Behrens III. (New York: Universe Books, 1972. Pp. 205. $2.75.) , 1973 .

[11]  A. J. Lotka Contribution to the Theory of Periodic Reactions , 1909 .

[12]  F. Chapin,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .

[13]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Sustainable use of renewable resources in a stylized social–ecological network model under heterogeneous resource distribution , 2016 .

[14]  D. Usher The Dynastic Cycle and the Stationary State. , 1989 .

[15]  H. J. Schellnhuber,et al.  ‘Earth system’ analysis and the second Copernican revolution , 1999, Nature.

[16]  Robert Clewley,et al.  Hybrid Models and Biological Model Reduction with PyDSTool , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  W. Steffen,et al.  The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration , 2015 .

[18]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Horses for courses : analytical tools to explore planetary boundaries , 2015 .

[19]  Will Steffen,et al.  The topology of non-linear global carbon dynamics: from tipping points to planetary boundaries , 2013 .

[20]  P. Crutzen Geology of mankind , 2002, Nature.

[21]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet , 2015, Science.

[22]  A. Merico,et al.  Tipping points and user-resource system collapse in a simple model of evolutionary dynamics , 2013 .

[23]  J. Rockström,et al.  Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science , 2016 .

[24]  Jonathan F. Donges,et al.  Topology of sustainable management of dynamical systems with desirable states : from defining planetary boundaries to safe operating spaces in the Earth system , 2015 .

[25]  Gustav Feichtinger,et al.  Slow-fast dynamics in Wonderland , 1996 .

[26]  T. Malthus An essay on the principle of population, as it affects the future improvement of society , 2006 .

[27]  Peter M. Cox,et al.  Emergent dynamics of the climate–economy system in the Anthropocene , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[28]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Macroscopic description of complex adaptive networks coevolving with dynamic node states. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  Peter Turchin,et al.  Long‐Term Population Cycles in Human Societies , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Y. Kuznetsov Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory , 2023, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[31]  E. Kalnay,et al.  Methodological and Ideological Options Human and nature dynamics ( HANDY ) : Modeling inequality and use of resources in the collapse or sustainability of societies , 2014 .

[32]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Operationalization of Topology of Sustainable Management to Estimate Qualitatively Different Regions in State Space , 2017, 1706.04542.

[33]  Jean-Pascal van Ypersele de Strihou,et al.  Towards New Scenarios for Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies , 2008 .

[34]  J. Farley,et al.  SPECIAL ISSUE: The Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services: Integrating Economic and Ecological Perspectives Modeling the dynamics of the integrated earth system and the value of global ecosystem services using the GUMBO model , 2002 .

[35]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Collateral transgression of planetary boundaries due to climate engineering by terrestrial carbon dioxide removal , 2016 .

[36]  R. Costanza Limits to growth: The 30-year update , 2006 .

[37]  Andreas Malm,et al.  The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative , 2014 .

[38]  I. Prucha,et al.  Estimation of the Depreciation Rate of Physical and R&D Capital in the U.S. Total Manufacturing Sector , 1993 .

[39]  M. Kremer Population Growth and Technological Change: One Million B.C. to 1990 , 1993 .