Breast cancer assessment tools and optimizing adjuvant therapy

Recommendation of systemic adjuvant therapy and choice of optimal agents for early-stage breast cancer remains a challenge. Adjuvant therapy is indicated on the assumption of residual micrometastatic disease. Adjuvant assessment tools for prognosis and prediction of treatment benefit, including Adjuvant! Online, the St Gallen Consensus, Oncotype DX® and MammaPrint®, aid clinical decision making. However, all of these tools have limitations that must be considered in their judicious application. Clinicopathological based tools are critically dependent on accurate, standardized measurement of parameters. Multigene tools are appealing for their objectivity and reproducibility, particularly regarding analysis of proliferation, but these approaches still overlook the biological heterogeneity within tumors evidenced by distinct cell subpopulations with different genomic patterns and function. The greatest treatment challenge remains for patients assessed as intermediate risk of relapse, a problem not overcome by multigene tools. Remarkable diversity in breast cancer dictates that adjuvant management must be biologically driven. Future identification of predictive biomarkers for specific chemotherapy sensitivity may allow targeted use of available agents, including anthracyclines, taxanes and DNA damaging agents. The presence of drug targets and targetable signaling pathways, rather than molecularly defined subgroups, may ultimately drive treatment decisions.

[1]  J. Troge,et al.  Inferring tumor progression from genomic heterogeneity. , 2010, Genome research.

[2]  L. V. van't Veer,et al.  Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Prognostic Value of a Combined ER, PgR, Ki67, HER2 Immunohistochemical (IHC4) Score and Comparison with the GHI Recurrence Score – Results from TransATAC. , 2009 .

[4]  D. Berry,et al.  Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer. , 2006, JAMA.

[5]  Mitch Dowsett,et al.  Proliferation marker Ki-67 in early breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  Anne Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Circulating Tumor Cell Detection Predicts Early Metastatic Relapse After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Large Operable and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer in a Phase II Randomized Trial , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  W. Al-Delaimy,et al.  A hospital-based retrospective cohort study of allergen immunotherapy as a preventive treatment for new onset asthma , 2005 .

[8]  C. Carter,et al.  Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases , 1989, Cancer.

[9]  D. Mavroudis,et al.  Clinical relevance of circulating CK-19 mRNA-positive cells detected during the adjuvant tamoxifen treatment in patients with early breast cancer. , 2007, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  H. Kölbl,et al.  The humoral immune system has a key prognostic impact in node-negative breast cancer. , 2008, Cancer research.

[11]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[12]  Gianluca Bontempi,et al.  Biological Processes Associated with Breast Cancer Clinical Outcome Depend on the Molecular Subtypes , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[13]  S. Nofech-Mozes,et al.  Intratumoral Heterogeneity of HER2/neu in Breast Cancer—A Rare Event , 2007, The breast journal.

[14]  T. Fehm,et al.  A pooled analysis of bone marrow micrometastasis in breast cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  R. Gelber,et al.  Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2009 , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[16]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[17]  Y Wang,et al.  Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials , 2005, The Lancet.

[18]  C. Desmedt,et al.  A meta-analysis of phase III trials evaluating the predictive value of HER2 and topoisomerase II alpha in early breast cancer patients treated with CMF or anthracycline-based adjuvant therapy. , 2009 .

[19]  I. Ellis,et al.  An immune response gene expression module identifies a good prognosis subtype in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer , 2007, Genome Biology.

[20]  I. Ellis,et al.  The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[21]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  A simple system for grading the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[22]  Daniel F. Hayes,et al.  Is There a Role for Circulating Tumor Cells in the Management of Breast Cancer? , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[23]  Van,et al.  A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Jonathan W. Uhr,et al.  Tumor Cells Circulate in the Peripheral Blood of All Major Carcinomas but not in Healthy Subjects or Patients With Nonmalignant Diseases , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  R. Gelber,et al.  Progress and promise: highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007. , 2007, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[26]  W. Fraser Symmans,et al.  Standardizing Slide-Based Assays in Breast Cancer: Hormone Receptors, HER2, and Sentinel Lymph Nodes , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[27]  M. Cronin,et al.  Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[29]  S. Mook,et al.  Calibration and discriminatory accuracy of prognosis calculation for breast cancer with the online Adjuvant! program: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[30]  Robert Gray,et al.  Prognostic utility of the 21-gene assay in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer compared with classical clinicopathologic features. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  B. Jasani,et al.  Potential for false-positive staining with a rabbit monoclonal antibody to progesterone receptor (SP2): findings of the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Immunocytochemistry and FISH highlight the need for correct validation of antibodies on introduction to the laboratory. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[32]  C Caldas,et al.  Proliferation markers and survival in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 studies in 32,825 patients. , 2008, Breast.

[33]  W. Woodward,et al.  Prognostic impact of discordance between triple-receptor measurements in primary and recurrent breast cancer. , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[34]  T. Kroll,et al.  Monitoring the response of circulating epithelial tumor cells to adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer allows detection of patients at risk of early relapse. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  D. Mavroudis,et al.  Predictive and prognostic value of peripheral blood cytokeratin-19 mRNA-positive cells detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction in node-negative breast cancer patients. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  Wim H van Harten,et al.  Use of 70-gene signature to predict prognosis of patients with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective community-based feasibility study (RASTER). , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[37]  A. Nobel,et al.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  G. Francis,et al.  Frequency and reliability of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 in breast carcinoma determined by immunohistochemistry in Australasia: results of the RCPA Quality Assurance Program , 2007, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[39]  Karen A Gelmon,et al.  Population-based validation of the prognostic model ADJUVANT! for early breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  Robert B Livingston,et al.  Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[41]  Michael Hauptmann,et al.  The predictive value of the 70-gene signature for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[42]  David Cameron,et al.  A stroma-related gene signature predicts resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer , 2009, Nature Medicine.

[43]  B. Jasani,et al.  Immunohistochemical demonstration of oestrogen and progesterone receptors: correlation of standards achieved on in house tumours with that achieved on external quality assessment material in over 150 laboratories from 26 countries , 2000, Journal of clinical pathology.

[44]  C. Perou,et al.  The Triple Negative Paradox: Primary Tumor Chemosensitivity of Breast Cancer Subtypes , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[45]  Catherine Legrand 1687Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials : Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) , 2005 .

[46]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.

[47]  M. Cronin,et al.  Expression of the 21 genes in the Recurrence Score assay and tamoxifen clinical benefit in the NSABP study B-14 of node negative, estrogen receptor positive breast cancer , 2005 .

[48]  D. Barnes,et al.  Reliability of immunohistochemical demonstration of oestrogen receptors in routine practice: interlaboratory variance in the sensitivity of detection and evaluation of scoring systems , 2000, Journal of clinical pathology.

[49]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  30 years' follow up of randomised studies of adjuvant CMF in operable breast cancer: cohort study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[50]  G. Kallergi,et al.  Prognostic Value of the Molecular Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells Using a Multimarker Reverse Transcription-PCR Assay for Cytokeratin 19, Mammaglobin A, and HER2 in Early Breast Cancer , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[51]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Evaluation of microtubule-associated protein-Tau expression as a prognostic and predictive marker in the NSABP-B 28 randomized clinical trial. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[52]  M. Perraki,et al.  Detection of CK-19 mRNA-positive cells in the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients with histologically and immunohistochemically negative axillary lymph nodes. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[53]  L. Kiesel,et al.  HER2-Positive Circulating Tumor Cells Indicate Poor Clinical Outcome in Stage I to III Breast Cancer Patients , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[54]  Y. Miyoshi,et al.  Increased Expression of BRCA1 mRNA Predicts Favorable Response to Anthracycline-Containing Chemotherapy in Breast Cancers , 2003, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[55]  G. Viale,et al.  Pathological definition of triple negative breast cancer. , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[56]  Annuska M. Glas,et al.  The 70-gene signature as a response predictor for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[57]  G. Dranitsaris,et al.  Does confirmatory tumor biopsy alter the management of breast cancer patients with distant metastases? , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[58]  P. Ravdin,et al.  Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[59]  M. Cronin,et al.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[60]  A. Goldhirsch,et al.  Clinical relevance of HER2 overexpression/amplification in patients with small tumor size and node-negative breast cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[61]  Thomas Rüdiger,et al.  Inter‐laboratory and inter‐observer reproducibility of immunohistochemical assessment of the Ki‐67 labelling index in a large multi‐centre trial , 2002, The Journal of pathology.

[62]  Charles M. Perou,et al.  Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[63]  D. Slamon,et al.  HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[64]  A. Gown,et al.  Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression as a prognostic factor in a large tissue microarray series of node-negative breast cancers. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[65]  Carsten Denkert,et al.  Tumor-associated lymphocytes as an independent predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[66]  E. Perez,et al.  Focal HER2/neu amplified clones partially account for discordance between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in-situ hybridization results: data from NCCTG N9831 Intergroup Adjuvant Trial. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.