Uncertainty in collaborative NPD: Effects on the selection of technology and supplier

To gain competitive advantage, firms involve suppliers in New Product Development (NPD). However, uncertainty affects selection of suppliers and associated technologies, and selection outcomes in terms of commitment to one supplier or maintaining flexibility. We report on a case study of collaborative NPD with the aim to develop an energy storage unit. The case involved selection of both technology and supplier, where both were changed during the NPD. Drawing upon Hall et al. (2011), we analyze technological, organizational and commercial uncertainties. We demonstrate how technological, commercial and organizational uncertainties cause firms to seek flexibility rather than commitment to one supplier.

[1]  Ian P. McCarthy,et al.  Understanding outsourcing contexts through information asymmetry and capability fit , 2013 .

[2]  Gianluca Spina,et al.  A model of co-design relationships: definitions and contingencies , 2002, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[3]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[4]  P. Draper.  Reflexive methodology - new vistas for qualitative research: Media Reviews , 2008 .

[5]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[6]  Claus Daniel,et al.  Materials and processing for lithium-ion batteries , 2008 .

[7]  David Lane,et al.  Ontological uncertainty and innovation , 2005 .

[8]  P. Humphreys,et al.  Supplier involvement in product development in the electronics industry: A case study , 2006 .

[9]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[10]  G. Zsidisin,et al.  Managing Supply Risk with Early Supplier Involvement: A Case Study and Research Propositions , 2005 .

[11]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[12]  Michael Song,et al.  Supplier's involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures , 2008 .

[13]  K. Clark.  Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development , 1989 .

[14]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[15]  Kathleen M. MacQueen,et al.  Handbook for Team-Based Qualitative Research , 2007 .

[16]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[17]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The power of modularity , 2000 .

[18]  Thomas V. Scannell,et al.  Success Factors for Integrating Suppliers into New Product Development , 1997 .

[19]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[20]  Prakash J. Singh,et al.  Revisiting the outsourcing debate: two sides of the same story , 2013 .

[21]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Knowledge Integration and Innovation : Critical Challenges Facing International Technology-Based Firms , 2011 .

[22]  J. Fagerberg.  Innovation: A Guide to the Literature , 2003 .

[23]  Rebecca Grant,et al.  Determinants of new product designers' satisfaction with suppliers' contributions , 1997 .

[24]  Gary L. Ragatz,et al.  Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty , 2002 .

[25]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[26]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[27]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[28]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[29]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[30]  Robert Phaal,et al.  From theory to practice: challenges in operationalising a technology selection framework , 2006 .

[31]  H. Arp,et al.  The Art of Science , 1973, Nature.

[32]  R. Yin,et al.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed. , 2009 .

[33]  Fredrik Von Corswant,et al.  Coordinating customers and proactive suppliers: A case study of supplier collaboration in product development , 2002 .

[34]  Alfred Kieser,et al.  How much do specialists have to learn from each other when they jointly develop radical product innovations , 2008 .

[35]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Buyer-Supplier Collaboration in Product Development Projects , 2005 .

[36]  Manoj K. Malhotra,et al.  Antecedents to supplier integration in the automotive industry: A multiple-case study of foreign subsidiaries in China , 2010 .

[37]  Markus C. Becker,et al.  Organising new product development: Knowledge hollowing-out and knowledge integration , 2003 .

[38]  F. Knight.  The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[39]  C. Freeman.  Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[40]  Claus Daniel,et al.  Materials processing for lithium-ion batteries , 2011 .

[41]  R. Handfield,et al.  Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design , 2005 .

[42]  Nicolaj Siggelkow.  Persuasion with case studies , 2007 .

[43]  Ian Alexander,et al.  An introduction to qualitative research , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Beverly B. Tyler.  The complementarity of cooperative and technological competencies: a resource-based perspective , 2001 .

[45]  Rajan R. Kamath,et al.  A Second Look at Japanese Product Development , 1995 .

[46]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[47]  R. Handfield,et al.  Involving Suppliers in New Product Development , 1999 .

[48]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  Collaborating for new product development: Selecting the partner with maximum potential to create value , 2006 .

[49]  S. Dashkovskiy,et al.  Production Planning & Control , 2013 .

[50]  Victor P. Seidel,et al.  Collaborative Concept Development Using Supplier Competitions: Insights from the Automotive Industry , 2009 .

[51]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[52]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[53]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[54]  F. Wynstra,et al.  Managing supplier involvement in new product development: A multiple-case study , 2006 .

[55]  Colin Sharp.  Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.) , 2003 .

[56]  A. Bonaccorsi,et al.  Strategic Partnerships in New Product Development: an Italian Case Study , 1994 .

[57]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[58]  Franco Malerba,et al.  The Dynamics and Evolution of Industries , 1996 .

[59]  U. Flick.  An Introduction to Qualitative Research , 1998 .

[60]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[61]  Jeremy Hall,et al.  Disruptive Technologies, Stakeholders and the Innovation Value-Added Chain: A Framework for Evaluating Radical Technology Development , 2005 .

[62]  A. George,et al.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[63]  A. Walter,et al.  Relationship-specific factors influencing supplier involvement in customer new product development , 2003 .

[64]  J. Mouritsen,et al.  The analytical interview: Relevance beyond reflexivity , 2005 .

[65]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[66]  Jeffrey Cummings,et al.  Transferring R&D Knowledge : the Key Factors Affecting Knowledge Transfer Success , 2003 .

[67]  Nile W. Hatch,et al.  Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2001 .

[68]  G. Guest,et al.  Data Reduction Techniques for Large Qualitative Data Sets , 2007 .

[69]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[70]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing New Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality (Революция в разработке продуктов: количественный скачок в скорости, эффективности и качестве) , 1992 .

[71]  R. Handfield,et al.  A Model of Supplier Integration into New Product Development , 2003 .

[72]  C. Dustmann.  Advances in ZEBRA batteries , 2004 .

[73]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  In chains? An empirical study of antecedents of supplier product development activity in the automotive industry. , 2010 .

[74]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply Management Under High Goal Incongruence: An Empirical Examination of Disintermediation in the Aerospace Supply Chain , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[75]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[76]  Bruno S. Silvestre,et al.  Managing technological and social uncertainties of innovation: The evolution of Brazilian energy and agriculture , 2011 .

[77]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Involving suppliers in product development: Insights from R&D directors and project managers , 2006 .

[78]  Mauro Caputo,et al.  The nature of buyer‐supplier relationships in co‐design activities: The Italian auto industry case , 2002 .

[79]  Fredrik Tell.  The electrical industry , 2007 .

[80]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Option Value of Modularity in Design: An Example From Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .