HUMAN RIGHTS VS. ROBOT RIGHTS: Forecasts from Japan

ABSTRACT: Japan continues to be in the vanguard of human–robot communication and, since 2007, the state has actively promoted the virtues of a robot-dependent society and lifestyle. Nationwide surveys suggest that Japanese citizens are more comfortable sharing living and working environments with robots than with foreign caretakers and migrant workers. As their population continues to shrink and age faster than in other postindustrial nation-states, Japanese are banking on the robotics industry to reinvigorate the economy and to preserve the country's alleged ethnic homogeneity. These initiatives are paralleled by a growing support among some roboticists and politicians to confer citizenship on robots. The Japanese state has a problematic record on human rights, especially toward ethnic minorities and non-Japanese residents who have lived and worked in Japan for many generations. The possibility of robots acquiring civil status ahead of flesh-and-blood humans raises profound questions about the nature of citizenship and human rights. Already the idea of robots having evolved beyond consideration as “property” and acquiring legal status as sentient beings with “rights” is shaping developments in artificial intelligence and robotics outside of Japan, including in the United States. What does the pursuit in Japan of interdependence between humans and robots forecast about new approaches to and configurations of civil society and attendant rights there and in other technologically advanced postindustrial societies?

[1]  Frédéric Kaplan,et al.  Who is Afraid of the Humanoid? Investigating Cultural Differences in the Acceptance of Robots , 2004, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[2]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Understanding intelligence , 2020, Inequality by Design.

[3]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Beyond Asimov: The Three Laws of Responsible Robotics , 2009, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[4]  I. Asimov.  Robots and Empire , 1985 .

[5]  Berthold K. P. Horn.  Robot vision , 1986, MIT electrical engineering and computer science series.

[6]  T. Ziemke.  What’s that Thing Called Embodiment? , 2003 .

[7]  Lawrence Repeta.  Japan's Democracy at Risk – The LDP's Ten Most Dangerous Proposals for Constitutional Change , 2013 .

[8]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration , 2010, Ethics and Information Technology.

[9]  F. Tanaka,et al.  Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning , 2012, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[10]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Drinking from the firehose of experience , 2008, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[11]  R. Morck,et al.  Adoptive Expectations: Rising Sons in Japanese Family Firms , 2011 .

[12]  Yoshihiro Miyake.  Co-creation system and human-computer interaction , 2005, Third International Conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing (C5'05).

[13]  Lyle N. Long,et al.  Review of Consciousness and the Possibility of Conscious Robots , 2010, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[14]  Patrick Lin,et al.  Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics , 2011 .

[15]  Jenay M. Beer,et al.  Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction , 2014, Journal of human-robot interaction.

[16]  J. Robertson.  Robo Sapiens Japanicus: Humanoid Robots and the Posthuman Family , 2007 .

[17]  Garrett Hardin,et al.  Should Trees Have Standing?: Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects , 2012 .

[18]  Yvonne Koch.  The Psychology Of Learning And Motivation , 2016 .

[19]  M. Morioka.  The Concept of Inochi: A Philosophical Perspective on the Study of Life , 1993 .

[20]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[21]  A. Church,et al.  Astounding Science Fiction. , 1952 .

[22]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Self-Organization, Embodiment, and Biologically Inspired Robotics , 2007, Science.

[23]  Providential Deism,et al.  A Secular Age , 2009 .

[24]  D. Chapman.  TAMA‐CHAN AND SEALING JAPANESE IDENTITY , 2008 .

[25]  Hilary Putnam.  Mind, Language and Reality: Robots: machines or artificially created life? , 1975 .

[26]  A. Morita.  A neo-communitarian approach on human rights as a cosmopolitan imperative in East Asia , 2012 .

[27]  Chuen-Tsai Sun,et al.  Toward the Human–Robot Co-Existence Society: On Safety Intelligence for Next Generation Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[28]  Abraham Edel,et al.  Culture; A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions , 1954 .

[29]  Alfred G. Meyer,et al.  Culture, a critical review of concepts and definitions , 1953 .

[30]  J. Robertson.  Gendering Humanoid Robots: Robo-Sexism in Japan , 2010 .