Do Journals Publishing in the Field of Urology Endorse Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of Author Instructions

Introduction: Reporting guidelines aim to ensure adequate and complete reporting of clinical studies and are an indispensable tool to translate scientific results into clinical practice. The extent to which reporting guidelines are incorporated into the author instructions of journals publishing in the field of urology remained unclear. Materials and Methods: We assessed the author instructions of uro-nephrological journals indexed in ‘Journal Citation Reports 2009’. Two authors independently assessed the author guidelines. We evaluated additional information including whether a journal was published by or in association with a medical association. Discrepancies were resolved by re-checking the respective author instructions and by discussion with a third author. Results: The recommendations of the International Committee of Journal Editors were endorsed by 32 journals (58.2%) but were mentioned in 12 (37.5%) only to give general advice about manuscript preparation. Fourteen journals (25.5%) mentioned at least one reporting guideline, with CONSORT the most frequently cited. Journals with high impact factors were more likely to endorse CONSORT (p < 0.009). Other reporting guidelines were mentioned by <6% of the journals. Conclusion: All key stakeholders involved in the publication process should more frequently promote the awareness and use of reporting guidelines.

[1]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. , 2007, Annals of internal medicine.

[2]  I. Olkin,et al.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting , 2000 .

[3]  D. Moher,et al.  A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research , 2010, European journal of clinical investigation.

[4]  D. Rennie,et al.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  G. Antes.  The new CONSORT statement , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  D. Moher,et al.  Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors' , 2008, Trials.

[9]  D. Moher,et al.  Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.

[10]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE statement , 2009, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[11]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[12]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist. , 2002, Controlled clinical trials.

[13]  B. Welk,et al.  Randomized controlled trials in pediatric urology: room for improvement. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[14]  Matthias Egger,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[15]  D. Altman,et al.  Writing a research article that is “fit for purpose”: EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement , 2006, Neurology.

[17]  G. Antes,et al.  Editorial policies of pediatric journals: survey of instructions for authors. , 2010, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[18]  Robert W. Matthews,et al.  Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication , 2010, Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics.

[19]  G. Preminger,et al.  A Critical Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Randomized, Controlled Trials in the Urology Literature , 2007 .

[20]  V. Demicheli,et al.  Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[21]  D. Moher,et al.  Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. , 2001, JAMA.

[22]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[23]  P. Dahm,et al.  Evaluating the evidence: the methodological and reporting quality of comparative observational studies of surgical interventions in urological publications , 2009, BJU international.

[24]  Iveta Simera,et al.  EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research , 2008, Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal.

[25]  Greg Ogrinc,et al.  Publication guidelines for improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE Project. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.

[26]  Arthur V. Iansavichus,et al.  Need for quality improvement in renal systematic reviews. , 2008, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[27]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[28]  Don C Des Jarlais,et al.  Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[29]  A. Oxman,et al.  Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement , 2006, Health research policy and systems.