Characterization of ambient aerosols in Mexico City during the MCMA-2003 campaign with Aerosol Mass Spectrometry: results from the CENICA Supersite

An Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS) was deployed at the CENICA Supersite, during the Mexico City Metropolitan Area field study (MCMA-2003) from 31 March-4 May 2003 to investigate particle concentrations, sources, and processes. The AMS provides real time in- formation on mass concentration and composition of the non-refractory species in particulate matter less than 1 µm (NR-PM1) with high time and size-resolution. In order to account for the refractory material in the aerosol, we also present estimates of Black Carbon (BC) using an aethalome- ter and an estimate of the aerosol soil component obtained from Proton-Induced X-ray Emission Spectrometry (PIXE) analysis of impactor substrates. Comparisons of AMS + BC + soil mass concentration with other collocated particle instruments (a LASAIR Optical Particle Counter, a PM2.5 Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM), and a PM2.5 DustTrak Aerosol Monitor) show that the AMS + BC + soil mass concentration is consistent with the total PM2.5 mass concentration during MCMA-2003 within the combined uncertainties. In Mexico City, the organic fraction of the estimated PM2.5 at CENICA represents, on average, 54.6% (standard deviation =10%) of the mass, with the rest consisting of inorganic compounds (mainly ammonium ni- trate and sulfate/ammonium salts), BC, and soil. Inorganic compounds represent 27.5% of PM2.5 ( =10%); BC mass concentration is about 11% ( =4%); while soil represents

[1]  J. Chow,et al.  Chemical composition of fugitive dust emitters in Mexico City , 2001 .

[2]  D. Worsnop,et al.  Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 2: Application to Combustion-Generated Soot Aerosols as a Function of Fuel Equivalence Ratio , 2004 .

[3]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Relative humidity and temperature dependence of the ammonium nitrate dissociation constant , 1982 .

[4]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Deconvolution and quantification of hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols based on aerosol mass spectrometry. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  T. Castro,et al.  Characterization of size-differentiated inorganic composition of aerosols in Mexico City , 2003 .

[6]  G. Raga,et al.  Diagnosing black carbon trends in large urban areas using carbon monoxide measurements , 2002 .

[7]  Klaus Willeke,et al.  Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications , 2001 .

[8]  W. Malm,et al.  Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States , 1994 .

[9]  M. Molina,et al.  Aerosol composition and source apportionment in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area with PIXE/PESA/STIM and multivariate analysis , 2006 .

[10]  W. M. Haynes.  CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1990 .

[11]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Submicron aerosol composition at Trinidad Head, California, during ITCT 2K2: Its relationship with gas phase volatile organic carbon and assessment of instrument performance , 2004 .

[12]  M. Molina,et al.  Characterization of ambient aerosols in Mexico City during the MCMA-2003 campaign with Aerosol Mass Spectrometry ? Part I: quantification, shape-related collection efficiency, and comparison with collocated instruments , 2005 .

[13]  D. Murphy,et al.  Aerosol characteristics at Idaho Hill during the OH Photochemistry Experiment , 1997 .

[14]  J C Chow,et al.  Particulate Air Pollution in Mexico City: A Collaborative Research Project. , 1999, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[15]  Douglas R. Worsnop,et al.  Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 1: Theory , 2004 .

[16]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Correction to “New particle formation from photooxidation of diiodomethane (CH2I2)” , 2003 .

[17]  D. R. Worsnop,et al.  Hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols in Pittsburgh: insights into sources and processes of organic aerosols , 2005 .

[18]  William J. Teesdale,et al.  The Guelph PIXE software package II , 1989 .

[19]  J. Chow,et al.  Comparison of continuous and filter based mass measurements in Mexico City , 2003 .

[20]  M. Molina,et al.  Air Quality in the Mexico Megacity , 2002 .

[21]  J. Frederick,et al.  An Empirical Method for the Determination of the Complex Refractive Index of Size-Fractionated Atmospheric Aerosols for Radiative Transfer Calculations , 2001 .

[22]  C. J. Chung,et al.  Respiratory damage in children exposed to urban pollution , 2003, Pediatric pulmonology.

[23]  G. Raga,et al.  Mexico City air quality: a qualitative review of gas and aerosol measurements (1960–2000) , 2001 .

[24]  Kenneth L. Demerjian,et al.  Measurement of Ambient Aerosol Composition During the PMTACS-NY 2001 Using an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer. Part II: Chemically Speciated Mass Distributions Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[25]  Barbara J. Turpin,et al.  Species Contributions to PM2.5 Mass Concentrations: Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass , 2001 .

[26]  San Martini,et al.  Decision support tools for urban air quality management , 2004 .

[27]  R. Vogt,et al.  The heterogeneous reaction of HNO3 on mineral dust and γ-alumina surfaces: a combined Knudsen cell and DRIFTS study , 2004 .

[28]  G. Raga,et al.  On the evolution of aerosol properties at a mountain site above Mexico City , 2000 .

[29]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Chemical and physical processes controlling the distribution of aerosols in the Lower Fraser Valley, Canada, during the Pacific 2001 field campaign , 2004 .

[30]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  New particle formation from photooxidation of diiodomethane ( CH 2 I 2 ) , 2003 .

[31]  Charles E. Kolb,et al.  Chase Studies of Particulate Emissions from in-use New York City Vehicles , 2004 .

[32]  M. Grutter,et al.  Diurnal variability of size-differentiated inorganic aerosols and their gas-phase precursors during January and February of 2003 near downtown Mexico City , 2004 .

[33]  D. R. Worsnop,et al.  Density changes of aerosol particles as a result of chemical reaction , 2004 .

[34]  James Allan,et al.  Characterization of an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS): Intercomparison with Other Aerosol Instruments , 2005 .

[35]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1998 .

[36]  B. Lamb,et al.  Atmospheric Oxidation in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area (mcma) during April 2003 , 2003 .

[37]  M. Molina,et al.  DOAS measurement of glyoxal as an indicator for fast VOC chemistry in urban air , 2005 .

[38]  F. Valley.  Aerosol particle size distributions in the lower Fraser Valley: evidence for particle nucleation and growth , 2004 .

[39]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  Measurement of Inherent Material Density of Nanoparticle Agglomerates , 2004 .

[40]  R C Flagan,et al.  Measurements of secondary organic aerosol from oxidation of cycloalkenes, terpenes, and m-xylene using an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  L. Barrie,et al.  Development of PIXE, PESA and transmission ion microscopy capability to measure aerosols by size and time , 2002 .

[42]  P. Hopke,et al.  The comparison between thermal-optical transmittance elemental carbon and Aethalometer black carbon measured at multiple monitoring sites , 2004 .

[43]  Kenneth A. Smith,et al.  Aerosol mass spectrometer for size and composition analysis of submicron particles , 1998 .

[44]  D. Murphy,et al.  Chemical components of single particles measured with Particle Analysis by Laser Mass Spectrometry (PALMS) during the Atlanta SuperSite Project: Focus on organic/sulfate, lead, soot, and mineral particles , 2002 .

[45]  A. Wexler,et al.  Thermodynamic Model of the System H+−NH4+−Na+−SO42-−NO3-−Cl-−H2O at 298.15 K , 1998 .

[46]  D. Hauglustaine,et al.  Global Modelling of Heterogeneous Chemistry on Mineral Aerosol Surfaces : The Influence on Tropospheric Ozone Chemistry and Comparison to Observations , 2003 .

[47]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[48]  G. Raga,et al.  Evidence for the formation of CCN by photochemical processes in Mexico City , 2004 .

[49]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Time- and size-resolved chemical composition of submicron particles in Pittsburgh: Implications for aerosol sources and processes , 2005 .

[50]  D. Worsnop,et al.  Measurement of Ambient Aerosol Composition During the PMTACS-NY 2001 Using an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer. Part I: Mass Concentrations Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[51]  E Ortiz,et al.  Basic statistics of PM2.5 and PM10 in the atmosphere of Mexico City. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[52]  P. Brimblecombe,et al.  A Thermodynamic Model of the System HCl-HNO3-H2SO4-H2O, Including Solubilities of HBr, from <200 to 328 K , 1995 .

[53]  F. Drewnick,et al.  Semicontinuous PM2.5 Sulfate and Nitrate Measurements at an Urban and a Rural Location in New York: PMTACS-NY Summer 2001 and 2002 Campaigns , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[54]  D. Dockery,et al.  Particulate and ozone pollutant effects on the respiratory function of children in southwest Mexico City. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[55]  G. Raga,et al.  Evidence for volcanic influence on Mexico City aerosols , 1999 .

[56]  Martin Gallagher,et al.  2. Measurements of fine particulate chemical composition in two U.K. cities , 2003 .

[57]  M. Facchini,et al.  Aerosol chemical characteristics from sampling conducted on the Island of Jeju, Korea during ACE Asia , 2004 .

[58]  Judith C Chow,et al.  Chemical composition of PM2.5 and PM10 in Mexico City during winter 1997. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[59]  R. C. Weast.  CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1973 .

[60]  Regional and global distributions and lifetimes of sulfate aerosols from Mexico City and southeast China , 1999 .

[61]  J. Smith,et al.  Measurements of Mexico City nanoparticle size distributions: Observations of new particle formation and growth , 2004 .

[62]  D. Worsnop,et al.  Design, Modeling, Optimization, and Experimental Tests of a Particle Beam Width Probe for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer , 2005 .

[63]  J. D. Neece,et al.  Direct evidence for chlorine-enhanced urban ozone formation in Houston, Texas , 2003 .

[64]  M. Molina,et al.  Air quality in the Mexico megacity : an integrated assessment , 2002 .

[65]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Insights into the chemistry of new particle formation and growth events in Pittsburgh based on aerosol mass spectrometry. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[66]  Charles E. Kolb,et al.  Ambient aerosol sampling using the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer , 2003 .

[67]  T. Novakov,et al.  Real-time measurement of the absorption coefficient of aerosol particles. , 1982, Applied optics.

[68]  M. Molina,et al.  Mexico City basin wind circulation during the MCMA-2003 field campaign , 2005 .

[69]  S. Martin,et al.  Crystals Formed at 293 K by Aqueous Sulfate−Nitrate−Ammonium−Proton Aerosol Particles , 2004 .

[70]  Joachim V. R. Heberlein,et al.  Thermal plasma deposition of nanophase hard coatings , 2001 .

[71]  M. Molina,et al.  Processing of soot in an urban environment: case study from the Mexico City Metropolitan Area , 2005 .

[72]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  New particle formation from photooxidation of diiodomethane (CH2I2) , 2003 .

[73]  J. L. Martinez,et al.  The IMADA-AVER Boundary Layer Experiment in the Mexico City Area , 1998 .

[74]  J. Miranda,et al.  Proinflammatory and cytotoxic effects of Mexico City air pollution particulate matter in vitro are dependent on particle size and composition. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.