BASIC (BLI Adenoma Serrated International Classification) classification for colorectal polyp characterization with blue light imaging

Abstract Background and study aim Advanced endoscopic imaging has revolutionized the characterization of lesions during colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to create a new classification for differentiating subcentimetric hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps, and deeply invasive malignant lesions using blue-light imaging (BLI) with high definition, with and without optical magnification, as well as to assess its interobserver concordance. Methods A video library consisting of 48 videos/still images (with/without optical magnification) from 24 histologically verified polyps/cancer with BLI was prospectively created. In the first step, seven endoscopists with experience in electronic chromoendoscopy reviewed 12 BLI videos/still images with/without magnification representative of the different histotypes, and individually identified possible descriptors. In the second step, these descriptors were categorized and summarized with a modified Delphi methodology. In the third step, the seven endoscopists independently reviewed the remaining 36 videos/still images with/without optical magnification, and the interobserver agreement for the new descriptors was assessed. The interobserver agreement between endoscopists was assessed using Gwet’s AC1. Results By reviewing the initial 12 videos/still images, 43 descriptors were proposed. By a modified Delphi process, the endoscopists eventually agreed on summarizing 12 descriptors into three main domains. The main domains identified were: polyp surface (mucus, yes/no; regular/irregular; [pseudo]depressed, yes/no), pit appearance (featureless, yes/no; round/nonround with/without dark spots; homogeneous/heterogeneous distribution with/without focal loss), and vessels (present/absent, lacy, pericryptal, irregular). Interobserver agreement for the polyp surface domain appeared to be almost perfect for mucus (AC1 0.92 with and 0.88 without optical magnification), substantial for the regular/irregular surface (AC1 0.67 with and 0.66 without optical magnification). For the pit appearance domain, interobserver agreement was good for featureless (AC1 0.9 with and 0.8 without optical magnification), and round/nonround (AC1 0.77 with and 0.69 without optical magnification) descriptors, but less consistent for the homogeneity of distribution (AC1 with/without optical magnification 0.58). Agreement was almost perfect for the vessel domain (AC1 0.81 – 0.85). Conclusions The new BASIC classification takes into account both morphological features of the polyp, as well as crypt and vessel characteristics. A high concordance among the observers was shown for most of the summarized descriptors. Optical magnification had a beneficial effect in terms of interobserver agreement for most of the descriptors.

[1]  C. Hassan,et al.  Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2019 , 2019, Endoscopy.

[2]  K. Chayama,et al.  Diagnostic performance of Japan NBI Expert Team classification for differentiation among noninvasive, superficially invasive, and deeply invasive colorectal neoplasia. , 2017, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[3]  D. Hewett,et al.  Patient acceptance of the optical diagnosis and misdiagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps. , 2017, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[4]  F. Bazzoli,et al.  Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[5]  Charles J. Kahi,et al.  The "valley sign" in small and diminutive adenomas: prevalence, interobserver agreement, and validation as an adenoma marker. , 2017, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[6]  C. Hassan,et al.  Narrow-band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification to predict polyp histology: REDEFINE study (with videos). , 2016, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[7]  H. Pohl,et al.  Quality of optical diagnosis of diminutive polyps and associated factors , 2016, Endoscopy.

[8]  Helen Close,et al.  Narrow band imaging optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps in routine clinical practice: the Detect Inspect Characterise Resect and Discard 2 (DISCARD 2) study , 2016, Gut.

[9]  M. Rugge,et al.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline , 2015, Endoscopy.

[10]  A. Amato,et al.  Narrow-band imaging in the prediction of surveillance intervals after polypectomy in community practice , 2015, Endoscopy.

[11]  Silvia Sanduleanu,et al.  Development and validation of the WASP classification system for optical diagnosis of adenomas, hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps , 2015, Gut.

[12]  Paul Fockens,et al.  Polyp Morphology: An Interobserver Evaluation for the Paris Classification Among International Experts , 2015, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[13]  Shrikant I Bangdiwala,et al.  Observer agreement paradoxes in 2x2 tables: comparison of agreement measures , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[14]  Maria Pellisé,et al.  Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline , 2014, Endoscopy.

[15]  Mariska M G Leeflang,et al.  Diagnostic performance of narrowed spectrum endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging, and confocal laser endomicroscopy for optical diagnosis of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[16]  Shinji Tanaka,et al.  Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification. , 2013, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[17]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[18]  Shinji Tanaka,et al.  Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. , 2012, Gastroenterology.

[19]  L. Bisanti,et al.  Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial--SCORE. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  Kazuhide Yamamoto,et al.  SANO'S CAPILLARY PATTERN CLASSIFICATION FOR NARROW‐BAND IMAGING OF EARLY COLORECTAL LESIONS , 2011, Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

[21]  Charles J. Kahi,et al.  The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. , 2011, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[22]  M. Vieth,et al.  Quality assurance in pathology in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis—European recommendations , 2010, Virchows Archiv.

[23]  C. Hassan,et al.  A resect and discard strategy would improve cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. , 2010, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[24]  Cancer,et al.  Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[25]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  Reducing costs of colon polyp management. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[26]  C. Hassan,et al.  Systematic review: distribution of advanced neoplasia according to polyp size at screening colonoscopy , 2009, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[27]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  Narrow-band imaging without optical magnification for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps. , 2009, Gastroenterology.

[28]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[29]  P. Maisonneuve,et al.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[30]  K. Gwet Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. , 2008, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[31]  B. Levin,et al.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[32]  Charles J. Lightdale,et al.  Update on the Paris Classification of Superficial Neoplastic Lesions in the Digestive Tract , 2005, Endoscopy.

[33]  Y. Sano,et al.  Chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine dye spraying with magnifying observation is the most reliable method for differential diagnosis between non-neoplastic and neoplastic colorectal lesions: a prospective study. , 2004, Endoscopy.

[34]  H. Tajiri,et al.  Assessment of colorectal lesions using magnifying colonoscopy and mucosal dye spraying: can significant lesions be distinguished? , 2001, Endoscopy.

[35]  S. Kudo,et al.  Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. , 1996, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[36]  A. Zauber,et al.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. , 1993 .

[37]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by once-only sigmoidoscopy , 1993, The Lancet.

[38]  A V Milholland,et al.  Medical assessment by a Delphi group opinion technic. , 1973, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  Risk of cancer in small and diminutive colorectal polyps. , 2017, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[40]  K. Haruma,et al.  Detailed colonoscopy for detecting early superficial carcinoma: recent developments. , 2000, Journal of gastroenterology.

[41]  A. Feinstein,et al.  High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.