Wrinkle-like slip pulse on a fault between different

Pulses of slip velocity can propagate on a planar interface governed by a constant coefficient of friction, where the interface separates different elastic materials. Such pulses have been found in two-dimensional plane strain finite difference calculations of slip on a fault between elastic media with wave speeds differing by 20%. The self-sustaining propagation of the slip pulse arises from interaction between normal and tangential deformation that exists only with a material contrast. These calculations confirm the prediction of Weertman [1980] that a dislocation propagating steadily along a material interface has a tensile change of normal traction with the same pulse shape as slip velocity. The self-sustaining pulse is associated with a rapid transition from a head wave traveling along the interface with the S wave speed of the faster material, to an opposite polarity body wave traveling with the slower S speed. Slip occurs during the reversal of normal particle velocity. The pulse can propagate in a region with constant coefficient of friction and an initial stress state below the frictional criterion. Propagation occurs in only one direction, the direction of slip in the more compliant medium, with rupture velocity near the slower S wave speed. Displacement is larger in the softer medium, which is displaced away from the fault during the passage of the slip pulse. Motion is analogous to a propagating wrinkle in a carpet. The amplitude of slip remains approximately constant during propagation, but the pulse width decreases and the amplitudes of slip velocity and stress change increase. The tensile change of normal traction increases until absolute normal traction reaches zero. The pulse can be generated as a secondary effect of a drop of shear stress in an asperity. The pulse shape is unstable, and the initial slip pulse can change during propagation into a collection of sharper pulses. Such a pulse enables slip to occur with little loss of energy to friction, while at the same time increasing irregularity of stress and slip at the source.

[1]  J. Brune,et al.  Heat Flow, Stress, and Rate of Slip along the San Andreas Fault, , 1969 .

[2]  Yehuda Ben-Zion,et al.  Seismic radiation from an SH line source in a laterally heterogeneous planar fault zone , 1990, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  T. McEvilly,et al.  Velocity contrast across the San Andreas fault in central California: Small-scale variations from P-wave nodal plane distortion , 1977, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  J. Rice,et al.  Slip patterns and earthquake populations along different classes of faults in elastic solids , 1995 .

[5]  T. Heaton Evidence for and implications of self-healing pulses of slip in earthquake rupture , 1990 .

[6]  H. Jay Melosh,et al.  Acoustic fluidization: A new geologic process? , 1979 .

[7]  A. Schallamach How Does Rubber Slide , 1971 .

[8]  W. T. Parry,et al.  Fracturing and hydrothermal alteration in normal fault zones , 1994 .

[9]  Peter Mora,et al.  Simulation of the frictional stick-slip instability , 1994 .

[10]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , 1985 .

[11]  Maria Comninou,et al.  Can two solids slide without slipping , 1978 .

[12]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  Mechanics of fault junctions , 1989 .

[13]  J. Weertman,et al.  Unstable slippage across a fault that separates elastic media of different elastic constants , 1980 .

[14]  Y. Ben‐Zion The response of two joined quarter spaces to SH line sources located at the material discontinuity interface , 1989 .

[15]  Maria Comninou,et al.  Elastic Interface Waves and Sliding Between Two Solids , 1978 .

[16]  J. Lomnitz-Adler Model for steady state friction , 1991 .

[17]  Y. Ben‐Zion,et al.  San Andreas Fault Zone Head Waves Near Parkfield, California , 1991, Science.

[18]  G. Wasserburg,et al.  Heat flow near major strike‐slip faults in California , 1971 .

[19]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  Rupture propagation with finite stress in antiplane strain , 1976 .

[20]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  A numerical study of tectonic stress release by underground explosions , 1973 .

[21]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  Rupture velocity of plane strain shear cracks , 1976 .

[22]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Seismic guided waves trapped in the fault zone of the Landers , 1994 .

[23]  S. Hough,et al.  Fault-zone waves observed at the southern Joshua Tree earthquake rupture zone , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[24]  A. Michael,et al.  Three‐dimensional velocity structure, seismicity, and fault structure in the Parkfield Region, central California , 1993 .

[25]  Peggy A. Johnson,et al.  Rupture mechanism and interface separation in foam rubber models of earthquakes: a possible solution to the heat flow paradox and the paradox of large overthrusts , 1993 .

[26]  M. Comninou A property of interface dislocations , 1977 .

[27]  Maria Comninou,et al.  Elastic Interface Waves Involving Separation , 1977 .

[28]  A. Lachenbruch,et al.  Heat flow from Cajon Pass, fault strength, and tectonic implications , 1992 .

[29]  T. McEvilly,et al.  Interpretation of seismic reflection profiling data for the structure of the San Andreas fault zone , 1983 .

[30]  Y. Ben‐Zion The response of two half spaces to point dislocations at the material interface , 1990 .