Tobacco control law enforcement and compliance in Odisha, India--implications for tobacco control policy and practice.

INTRODUCTION Tobacco use is a leading cause of deaths and disabilities in India, killing about 1.2 lakh people in 2010. About 29% of adults use tobacco on a daily basis and an additional 5% use it occasionally. In Odisha, non-smoking forms are more prevalent than smoking forms. The habit has very high opportunity cost as it reduces the capacity to seek better nutrition, medical care and education. In line with the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) is a powerful Indian national law on tobacco control. The Government of Odisha has shown its commitment towards enforcement and compliance of COTPA provisions. In order to gauge the perceptions and practices related to tobacco control efforts and level of enforcement of COTPA in the State, this cross-sectional study was carried out in seven selected districts. MATERIALS AND METHODS A semi-structured interview schedule was developed, translated into Odiya and field-tested for data collection. It mainly contained questions related to knowledge on provisions of section 4-7 of COTPA 2003, perception about smoking, chewing tobacco and practices with respect to compliance of selected provisions of the Act. 1414 samples were interviewed. RESULTS The highest percentage of respondents was from the government departments. 70% of the illiterates consumed tobacco as compared to 34% post graduates. 52.1% of the respondents were aware of Indian tobacco control laws, while 80.8% had knowledge about the provision of the law prohibiting smoking in public places. However, 36.6% of the respondents reported that they had 'very often' ' seen tobacco products being sold 'to a minor', while 31.2% had seen tobacco products being sold 'by a minor'. In addition, 24.8% had 'very often' seen tobacco products being sold within a radius of 100 yards of educational institutions.

[1]  L. Reynolds,et al.  WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control , 2012 .

[2]  T. Selvavinayagam Overview on the implementation of smoke-free educational institutions in Tamilnadu, India. , 2010, Indian journal of cancer.

[3]  D. R. Revankar,et al.  Secondhand smoke in public places: can Bangalore metropolitan transport corporation be a role model for effective implementation of Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003? , 2010, Indian journal of cancer.

[4]  K. Thankappan,et al.  Awareness, attitude and perceived barriers regarding implementation of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act in Assam, India. , 2010, Indian journal of cancer.

[5]  H. Sung,et al.  Economic cost of tobacco use in India, 2004 , 2009, Tobacco Control.

[6]  R. Mehrotra,et al.  Tobacco control in India: present scenario and challenges ahead. , 2008, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[7]  P. Chaturvedi Indian needs stricter implementation..... , 2007, Indian journal of cancer.

[8]  M. Pednekar,et al.  Tobacco use among school students in Goa, India. , 2004, Indian journal of public health.

[9]  D. Sinha,et al.  Tobacco use among school personnel in Orissa. , 2004, Indian journal of public health.

[10]  Aravind Karinagannanavar,et al.  Awareness about pictorial warnings on tobacco products and its impact on tobacco consumers in Bellary, India. , 2011, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[11]  G. Rajesh,et al.  Insights into pictorial health warnings on tobacco product packages marketed in Uttar Pradesh, India. , 2010, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[12]  Raydel Valdés Salgado [The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control]. , 2003, Salud publica de Mexico.

[13]  R. Shimkhada,et al.  Tobacco control in India. , 2003, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.