Growth performance, windthrow, and insects: meta-analyses of parameters influencing performance of mixed-species stands in boreal and northern temperate biomes

Stand structure is a key attribute of forest ecosystems. Mixed-tree plantations are widely felt to be the appropriate option for providing a broad range of goods and environmental services and to reduce susceptibility to natural hazards. However, the debate continues whether mixed plantations can achieve greater financial return than monocultures can. In this study, mixed-species stands of conifers and hardwood species were analyzed in consideration of economically relevant fac- tors. Growth performance and resistance to hazards and pests are widely noted in the literature and are of general economic interest. Thus meta-analyses of relevant studies were conducted to test the following hypotheses: (1) mixing tree species has no significant influence on growth performance or resistance against hazards and pests and, if refuted, (2) mixing tree spe- cies causes mainly negative effects on growth performance and resistance against hazards and pests. However, a positive im- pact of mixing tree species was proven for resistance against windthrow and pests. The meta-analysis on growth performance just as well indicates a positive effect of mixing tree species. Overall, these positive results underscore the need for a large number of additional studies to examine different silvicultural systems to develop optimal management prescrip- tions to benefit from positive interactions. Resume : La structure du peuplement est un attribut cle des ecosystemes forestiers. Les plantations mixtes sont largement considerees comme une option appropriee pour fournir une large gamme de produits et de services environnementaux ainsi que pour reduire la predisposition aux catastrophes naturelles. Cependant, le debat persiste a savoir si les plantations mixtes peuvent procurer un meilleur rendement financier que les monocultures. Dans cette etude, des peuplements mixtes composes d'especes feuillues et resineuses ont ete analyses en tenant compte de facteurs pertinents du point de vue economique. La croissance et la resistance aux catastrophes et aux ravageurs sont couramment mentionnees dans la litterature et presentent un interet economique general. Des meta-analyses des etudes pertinentes ont par consequent ete realisees pour tester les hy- potheses suivantes : (1) le fait de melanger les especes d'arbre n'a aucun effet significatif sur la croissance ou la resistance aux catastrophes et aux ravageurs et si cette hypothese est refutee, (2) le fait de melanger les especes d'arbre a surtout des effets negatifs sur la croissance et la resistance aux catastrophes et aux ravageurs. Toutefois, un effet positif du melange des especes a ete demontre dans le cas de la resistance au chablis et aux ravageurs. La meta-analyse indique egalement que le melange des essences a un effet positif sur la croissance. Dans l'ensemble, ces resultats positifs soulignent la necessite d'ef- fectuer un grand nombre d'etudes additionnelles pour examiner differents systemes sylvicoles dans le but d'elaborer des prescriptions d'amenagement optimales pour beneficier des interactions positives. (Traduit par la Redaction)

[1]  Thomas Knoke,et al.  The optimal tree species composition for a private forest enterprise – applying the theory of portfolio selection , 2013 .

[2]  S. Pocock,et al.  Can meta-analyses be trusted? , 1991, The Lancet.

[3]  T. Koellner,et al.  Biodiversity, Ecosystem Function, and Investment Risk , 2006 .

[4]  Y. Bergeron,et al.  The responses of black spruce growth to an increased proportion of aspen in mixed stands , 2004 .

[5]  Christian Ammer,et al.  Admixing broadleaved to coniferous tree species: a review on yield, ecological stability and economics , 2008, European Journal of Forest Research.

[6]  V. Lieffers,et al.  Productivity of aspen stands with and without a spruce understory in Alberta's boreal mixedwood forests , 2001 .

[7]  A Liberati,et al.  "Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century": discussion. A plea for a more balanced view of meta-analysis and systematic overviews of the effect of health care interventions. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  K. Gayer Der gemischte Wald : seine Begründung und Pflege, insbesondere durch Horst= und Gruppenwirtschaft , 1886 .

[9]  Bruce C. Larson Pathways of development in mixed-species stands , 1992 .

[10]  B. Reineking,et al.  Models for forest ecosystem management: a European perspective. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[11]  J. Prietzel,et al.  Changes in soil organic C and N stocks after forest transformation from Norway spruce and Scots pine into Douglas fir, Douglas fir/spruce, or European beech stands at different sites in Southern Germany , 2012 .

[12]  Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo,et al.  Effects of climate change and management on timber yield in boreal forests, with economic implications : A case study , 2007 .

[13]  D. Binkley,et al.  Twenty years of stand development in pure and mixed stands of Eucalyptus saligna and nitrogen-fixing Facaltaria moluccana , 2003 .

[14]  D. Maclean,et al.  The influence of hardwood content on balsam fir defoliation by spruce budworm , 1996 .

[15]  L. Hedges,et al.  Meta-analysis: Combining the results of independent experiments , 1993 .

[16]  D. Binkley,et al.  Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesis , 2001 .

[17]  J C Bailar,et al.  The practice of meta-analysis. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  Annabel Porté,et al.  Modelling mixed forest growth: a review of models for forest management , 2002 .

[19]  E. Wald,et al.  Schweizerisches Landesforstinventar : Ergebnisse der Zweitaufnahme 1993-1995 , 1999 .

[20]  Daniel Piotto,et al.  A meta-analysis comparing tree growth in monocultures and mixed plantations , 2008 .

[21]  Jari Liski,et al.  Impact of changing wood demand, climate and land use on European forest resources and carbon stocks during the 21st century , 2008 .

[22]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Resistance of European tree species to drought stress in mixed versus pure forests: evidence of stress release by inter-specific facilitation. , 2013, Plant biology.

[23]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Diversity and Productivity in Forests: Evidence from Long-Term Experimental Plots , 2005 .

[24]  T. Nagaike Current Status and Perspectives of Mixed Tree Plantations , 2012 .

[25]  P. Erskine,et al.  Tree species diversity and ecosystem function: Can tropical multi-species plantations generate greater productivity? , 2006 .

[26]  B. Schmid,et al.  ECOSYSTEM EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY: A CLASSIFICATION OF HYPOTHESES AND EXPLORATION OF EMPIRICAL RESULTS , 1999 .

[27]  J. Koricheva,et al.  Diversification of tree stands as a means to manage pests and diseases in boreal forests: myth or reality? , 2006 .

[28]  H. Jactel,et al.  A Test of the Biodiversity-Stability Theory: Meta-analysis of Tree Species Diversity Effects on Insect Pest Infestations, and Re-examination of Responsible Factors , 2005 .

[29]  J. Koricheva,et al.  Effects of tree stand species composition on insect herbivory of silver birch in boreal forests , 2006 .

[30]  Xianli Wang,et al.  Are mixed-species stands more productive than single-species stands: an empirical test of three forest types in British Columbia and Alberta , 2003 .

[31]  J. Whittaker,et al.  Herbivory by insects on oak trees in pure stands compared with paired mixtures , 1991 .

[32]  L. Hedges,et al.  Introduction to Meta‐Analysis , 2009, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[33]  J. Vanclay,et al.  Mixed-species plantations: Prospects and challenges , 2006 .

[34]  Klaus J. Puettmann,et al.  A Critique of Silviculture: Managing for Complexity , 2008 .

[35]  R. Bailey Ecosystem Geography: From Ecoregions to Sites , 1995 .

[36]  H. Morin,et al.  Balsam fir mortality following the last spruce budworm outbreak in northwestern Quebec , 1995 .

[37]  Spruce diameter growth in young mixed stands of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and birch (Betula pendula Roth B. pubescens Ehrh.) , 2002 .

[38]  Jean-Philippe Schütz,et al.  Vulnerability of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest stands to storms and consequences for silviculture , 2006, European Journal of Forest Research.

[39]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Transgressive overyielding in mixed compared with pure stands of Norway spruce and European beech in Central Europe: evidence on stand level and explanation on individual tree level , 2009, European Journal of Forest Research.

[40]  Thomas Knoke,et al.  A Scientific Perspective for Silviculture , 2010 .

[41]  M. Kelty Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed-species stands , 1992 .

[42]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Estimation of the extinction risk for high-montane species as a consequence of global warming and assessment of their suitability as cross-taxon indicators , 2010 .

[43]  M. Amoroso,et al.  Comparing productivity of pure and mixed Douglas-fir and western hemlock plantations in the Pacific Northwest , 2006 .

[44]  Gert-Jan Nabuurs,et al.  Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries , 2003 .

[45]  Oscar García,et al.  Evaluating forest Growth Models , 1997 .

[46]  Georg Ludwig Hartig Anweisung zur Holzzucht für Förster , 1808 .

[47]  H. Erickson,et al.  Tree growth at stand and individual scales in two dual-species mixture experiments in southern Washington State, USA , 2009 .

[48]  Jürgen Bauhus,et al.  How does silviculture affect storm damage in forests of south-western Germany? Results from empirical modeling based on long-term observations , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[49]  M. Kelty The role of species mixtures in plantation forestry , 2006 .

[50]  DaLun Tian,et al.  Meta-analysis and its application in global change research , 2007 .

[51]  S G Thompson,et al.  The potential and limitations of meta-analysis. , 1991, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[52]  Manfred J. Lexer,et al.  Impact of bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) disturbance on timber production and carbon sequestration in different management strategies under climate change , 2008 .

[53]  J. Schaber,et al.  Responses of spring phenology to climate change , 2004 .

[54]  Thomas Seifert,et al.  Integrating selected ecological effects of mixed European beech-Norway spruce stands in bioeconomic modelling , 2008 .

[55]  D. Maclean Vulnerability of Fir-Spruce Stands During Uncontrolled Spruce Budworm Outbreaks: A Review and Discussion , 1980 .

[56]  George Davey Smith,et al.  meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies , 1998 .

[57]  T. Knoke,et al.  Does mixing tree species enhance stand resistance against natural hazards? A case study for spruce , 2012 .

[58]  Christian Cossalter,et al.  Fast-wood forestry : myths and realities , 2003 .

[59]  H. Jactel,et al.  Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[60]  H. Cotta Anweisung zum Waldbau , 1821 .

[61]  O. Hoegh‐Guldberg,et al.  Ecological responses to recent climate change , 2002, Nature.

[62]  E. Röhrig Waldbau auf ökologischer Grundlage , 2020 .

[63]  A. Cowie,et al.  Mixed-species plantations of Eucalyptus with nitrogen-fixing trees: A review , 2006 .

[64]  T. Johansson Mixed stands in Nordic countries—a challenge for the future , 2003 .