Causal inferences with group based trajectory models

A central theme of research on human development and psychopathology is whether a therapeutic intervention or a turning-point event, such as a family break-up, alters the trajectory of the behavior under study. This paper lays out and applies a method for using observational longitudinal data to make more confident causal inferences about the impact of such events on developmental trajectories. The method draws upon two distinct lines of research: work on the use of finite mixture modeling to analyze developmental trajectories and work on propensity scores. The essence of the method is to use the posterior probabilities of trajectory group membership from a finite mixture modeling framework, to create balance on lagged outcomes and other covariates established prior to t for the purpose of inferring the impact of first-time treatment at t on the outcome of interest. The approach is demonstrated with an analysis of the impact of gang membership on violent delinquency based on data from a large longitudinal study conducted in Montreal.

[1]  N. Morris,et al.  Crime and justice : an annual review of research , 1980 .

[2]  M B Keller,et al.  A dynamic adaptation of the propensity score adjustment for effectiveness analyses of ordinal doses of treatment , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class–latent growth modeling. , 2001 .

[4]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[5]  G. Elder,et al.  The life course as developmental theory. , 1998, Child development.

[6]  Richard E. Tremblay,et al.  The Preschool Behaviour Questionnaire: Stability of its Factor Structure Between Cultures, Sexes, Ages and Socioeconomic Classes , 1987 .

[7]  K. Land,et al.  AGE, CRIMINAL CAREERS, AND POPULATION HETEROGENEITY: SPECIFICATION AND ESTIMATION OF A NONPARAMETRIC, MIXED POISSON MODEL* , 1993 .

[8]  Barbara A. Poley-Strobel,et al.  The effects of a teaching-modeling intervention on early mother-infant reciprocity , 1987 .

[9]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semiparametric, group-based approach , 1999 .

[10]  D. Nagin,et al.  Developmental trajectories of boys' delinquent group membership and facilitation of violent behaviors during adolescence , 2003, Development and Psychopathology.

[11]  K. Roeder,et al.  A SAS Procedure Based on Mixture Models for Estimating Developmental Trajectories , 2001 .

[12]  Larry Wasserman,et al.  Estimation of the causal effect of a time-varying exposure on the marginal mean of a repeated binary outcome. Commentary. Authors' reply , 1999 .

[13]  B. Muthén,et al.  Finite Mixture Modeling with Mixture Outcomes Using the EM Algorithm , 1999, Biometrics.

[14]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  Group Process and Gang Delinquency , 1965 .

[15]  Lloyd E. Ohlin,et al.  Delinquency and Opportunity: A Theory of Delinquent Gangs. , 1961 .

[16]  T. Moffitt,et al.  LIFE-COURSE TRAJECTORIES OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF OFFENDERS* , 1995 .

[17]  A. Cohen,et al.  Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. , 1955 .

[18]  J. Robins.  A graphical approach to the identification and estimation of causal parameters in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[19]  A. Lizotte,et al.  THE DELINQUENCY OF CHILDREN BORN TO YOUNG MOTHERS: RESULTS FROM THE ROCHESTER YOUTH DEVELOPMENT STUDY* , 2003 .

[20]  D. Nagin.  Group-based modeling of development , 2005 .

[21]  E. Korn,et al.  Analysis of Health Surveys: Korn/Analysis , 1999 .

[22]  J. Schroots,et al.  Life-course Dynamics A Research Program in Progress from The Netherlands , 2003 .

[23]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Age and Crime , 1986, Crime and Justice.

[24]  Kathryn Roeder,et al.  Modeling Uncertainty in Latent Class Membership: A Case Study in Criminology , 1999 .

[25]  Richard Rosenfeld,et al.  Facilitating Violence: A Comparison of Gang-Motivated, Gang-Affiliated, and Nongang Youth Homicides , 1999 .

[26]  Linda M. Collins,et al.  New methods for the analysis of change , 2001 .

[27]  Alan J. Lizotte,et al.  Gangs and Delinquency in Developmental Perspective , 2002 .

[28]  J. Robins,et al.  Estimation of the Causal Effect of a Time-Varying Exposure on the Marginal Mean of a Repeated Binary Outcome , 1999 .

[29]  D. Rubin,et al.  Using Multivariate Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Control Bias in Observational Studies , 1978 .

[30]  Paul R. Rosenbaum,et al.  Balanced Risk Set Matching , 2001 .

[31]  L. Behar,et al.  The Preschool Behavior Questionnaire , 1977, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[32]  Edward L. Korn,et al.  Analysis of Health Surveys , 1999 .

[33]  Donald Hedeker,et al.  A Mixed-eeects Quintile-stratiÿed Propensity Adjustment for Eeectiveness Analyses of Ordered Categorical Doses ‡ , 2022 .

[34]  C. Drake.  Effects of misspecification of the propensity score on estimators of treatment effect , 1993 .

[35]  G. Imbens.  Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Exogeneity: A Review , 2004 .

[36]  A. Cohen,et al.  Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang , 1971 .