Setpoint control for reacting to wastewater influent in BSM1

This paper proposes a method for designing and tracking an optimal set point for a biological wastewater treatment, where the set point changes in real time in order to respond to changing influent disturbance. The objectives are to minimize energy consumption even while meeting or exceeding effluent quality standards, even during extreme weather events. The proposed method trains neural networks to estimate NARX models of the system. A nonlinear optimization then predicts an optimal set point, which is used as a search direction for finding the true optimal set point. The BSM1 simulation model provides a benchmark for testing the design. For tracking the set point, the standard PI controls found with BSM1 are replaced by adaptive controls, with an additional feedback loop not found in the original BSM1. Simulation results show that the proposed method improves both effluent quality and reduces energy consumption.

[1]  N Hvala,et al.  Comparison of control strategies for nitrogen removal in an activated sludge process in terms of operating costs: a simulation study. , 2007, Water research.

[2]  Ramon Vilanova,et al.  Applying variable dissolved oxygen set point in a two level hierarchical control structure to a wastewater treatment process , 2015 .

[3]  Hicham El Bahja,et al.  Investigation of Different Control Strategies for the Waste Water Treatement Plant , 2011 .

[4]  Junfei Qiao,et al.  Model predictive control of dissolved oxygen concentration based on a self-organizing RBF neural network , 2012 .

[5]  Chris J. B. Macnab,et al.  Using CMAC for adaptive nonlinear MPC and optimal setpoint identification of an activated sludge process , 2017, 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI).

[6]  Ramon Vilanova,et al.  Fuzzy Control and Model Predictive Control Configurations for Effluent Violations Removal in Wastewater Treatment Plants , 2015 .

[7]  B. Holenda,et al.  Dissolved oxygen control of the activated sludge wastewater treatment process using model predictive control , 2008, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[8]  Sylvie Gillot,et al.  The COST Simulation Benchmark: Description and Simulator Manual , 2001 .

[9]  D. Vrecko,et al.  Improvement of ammonia removal in activated sludge process with feedforward-feedback aeration controllers. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  Sirish L. Shah,et al.  Multivariate Controller Performance Analysis : Methods , Applications and Challenges , 2002 .

[11]  Cristian Pop,et al.  Model Predictive Control of the waste water treatment plant based on the Benchmark Simulation Model No.1-BSM1 , 2008 .

[12]  M. N. Pons,et al.  Benchmark for evaluating control strategies in wastewater treatment plants , 1999, 1999 European Control Conference (ECC).

[13]  Piotr Tatjewski,et al.  Cooperation of model predictive control with steady-state economic optimisation , 2008 .

[14]  Hong-Gui Han,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective model-predictive control scheme for wastewater treatment process , 2014 .