Standalone personal health records in the United States: meeting patient desires

Personal health records (PHRs) are electronic tools for patients to maintain a comprehensive record of their health information. Despite the potential for PHRs to increase patient involvement in their overall health care and lead to shared decision-making with their health care providers, only 11 % of consumers in the United States maintain a PHR. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how standalone PHRs address the reported desires of patients. An Internet search identified nineteen web-based standalone PHRs that were available free-of-charge. A literature search was conducted to identify patient-reported desires for a PHR. A checklist was constructed with an evaluation procedure to assess the presence of functionalities within each standalone PHR that met identified patient desires. Each of the nineteen identified PHRs was then assessed using this checklist. Providing security and privacy protections for patients’ health information; having information presented in layman’s terms; and generating a printed report of health information were the only desires met by more than half of the evaluated PHRs. Only five PHRs met over half of the patient desires. Findings reveal that current standalone PHRs are designed to serve as a repository of health information, rather than as an interactive tool to help patients become more knowledgeable about and involved in their own care. There is a need for patient perspectives to be considered and integrated into the design of PHRs in order for PHRs to achieve their full potential.

[1]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Eric C. Pan,et al.  The Value of Personal Health Record (PHR) Systems , 2008, AMIA.

[3]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Evidence Base for Personal Health Record Usability 1 Final Report to the National Cancer Institute , 2007 .

[4]  Catherine R Selden,et al.  Characteristics of personal health records: findings of the Medical Library Association/National Library of Medicine Joint Electronic Personal Health Record Task Force. , 2010, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[5]  Tom Delbanco,et al.  Insights for Internists: “I Want the Computer to Know Who I Am” , 2009, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[6]  Alla Keselman,et al.  Towards Consumer-Friendly PHRs: Patients' Experience with Reviewing Their Health Records , 2007, AMIA.

[7]  Thomas A. Horan,et al.  Prospective Personal Health Record Use Among Different User Groups: Results of a Multi-wave Study , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[8]  Kenneth D Mandl,et al.  Acceptability of a Personally Controlled Health Record in a Community-Based Setting: Implications for Policy and Design , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  C. Pyper,et al.  Patients' experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care. , 2004, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[10]  Kim M. Nazi Veterans' voices: use of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) Survey to identify My HealtheVet personal health record users' characteristics, needs, and preferences , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  C. Pyper,et al.  Access to electronic health records in primary care-a survey of patients' views. , 2004, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[12]  Juan Pablo Hourcade,et al.  Design Lessons for Older Adult Personal Health Records Software from Older Adults , 2011, HCI.

[13]  William B. Lober,et al.  Barriers to the use of a Personal Health Record by an Elderly Population , 2006, AMIA.

[14]  David W. Bates,et al.  White Paper: Personal Health Records: Definitions, Benefits, and Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adoption , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[15]  Rachel Hess,et al.  Exploring challenges and potentials of personal health records in diabetes self-management: implementation and initial assessment. , 2007, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[16]  Warren J. Winkelman,et al.  Research Paper: Patient-Perceived Usefulness of Online Electronic Medical Records: Employing Grounded Theory in the Development of Information and Communication Technologies for Use by Patients Living with Chronic Illness , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[17]  I C Denton,et al.  Will patients use electronic personal health records? Responses from a real-life experience. , 2001, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[18]  Paul C. Tang,et al.  Integrated Personal Health Records: Transformative Tools for Consumer-Centric Care , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[19]  Erika L. Abramson,et al.  Consumer attitudes toward personal health records in a beacon community. , 2011, The American journal of managed care.

[20]  David W. Bates,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: A Research Agenda for Personal Health Records (PHRs) , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[21]  Marion J Ball,et al.  Personal health records: empowering consumers. , 2007, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[22]  Ahima The value of personal health records. A joint position statement for consumers of health care. , 2008, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[23]  Leslie S. Liu,et al.  Barriers to the adoption and use of personal health record systems , 2011, iConference.

[24]  David Young,et al.  Research Paper: Patient Experiences and Attitudes about Access to a Patient Electronic Health Care Record and Linked Web Messaging , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[25]  Sharon E. Straus,et al.  Personal health records: a scoping review , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[26]  Adam Bosworth,et al.  What it takes: characteristics of the ideal personal health record. , 2009, Health affairs.