The presentation of the networked self: Ethics and epistemology in social network analysis

Drawing on the seminal work of Goffman, Krackhardt and others, this paper argues that there is a crucial step in between participants’ perceptions and the collection and visualisation of data – i.e. what we call the presentation of the networked self. We employ examples from our own empirical work in the UK to argue that the presentation of the networked self requires researchers to adopt a highly reflexive approach. Framing our analysis within the context of contemporary society – including the impact of social media on a ‘networking mindset’ – we explore the range of ethical dilemmas which can emerge during a research encounter.

[1]  Bettina Hoser,et al.  Questions on ethics for research in the virtually connected world , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[2]  A. Kleinsasser.  Researchers, Reflexivity, and Good Data: Writing to Unlearn , 2000 .

[3]  L. Ryan,et al.  Talking Ties: Reflecting on Network Visualisation and Qualitative Interviewing , 2014 .

[4]  Alessio D'Angelo,et al.  Kurdish community organisations in London: a social network analysis , 2008 .

[5]  Louise Ryan,et al.  Looking for Weak Ties: Using a Mixed Methods Approach to Capture Elusive Connections , 2016 .

[6]  F. Sultana.  Reflexivity, Positionality and Participatory Ethics: Negotiating Fieldwork Dilemmas in International Research , 2007 .

[7]  N. Mauthner,et al.  Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis , 2003 .

[8]  W. Pillow.  Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research , 2003 .

[9]  L. Unwin,et al.  Change and continuity in apprenticeship: the resilience of a model of learning , 2009 .

[10]  V. May.  On Being a `Good' Mother , 2008 .

[11]  Louise Ryan,et al.  Changing times: Migrants' social network analysis and the challenges of longitudinal research , 2017, Soc. Networks.

[12]  Daniel J. Brass.  Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks , 2014 .

[13]  Thomas V. Pollet,et al.  Use of Social Network Sites and Instant Messaging Does Not Lead to Increased Offline Social Network Size, or to Emotionally Closer Relationships with Offline Network Members , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[14]  Louise Ryan,et al.  Muslim Women Negotiating Collective Stigmatization: ‘We’re Just Normal People’ , 2011 .

[15]  Ana Cristina Vasconcelos,et al.  ‘The presentation of self in the online world’: Goffman and the study of online identities , 2013, J. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  Imaginary Worlds: Using Visual Network Scales to Capture Perceptions of Social Networks , 2014 .

[17]  Lisa D. Pearce.  Mixed Methods Social Networks Research: Design and Applications , 2016 .

[18]  Bruce G. Link,et al.  Culture and stigma: adding moral experience to stigma theory. , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[19]  L. Ryan.  Differentiated embedding: Polish migrants in London negotiating belonging over time , 2018 .

[20]  G. Tampubolon,et al.  The Global Omnivore: Identifying Musical Taste Groups in Austria, England, Israel and Serbia , 2016, Sociological Research Online.

[21]  G. Labianca,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Group Social Capital , 2006 .

[22]  E. Goffman.  Encounters; Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction , 1962 .

[23]  A. Gilchrist.  The well-connected community: A networking approach to community development , 2004 .

[24]  L. Ryan,et al.  Perceptions, prejudices and possibilities: young people narrating apprenticeship experiences , 2018 .

[25]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Cognitive social structures , 1987 .

[26]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Toward ethical guidelines for network research in organizations , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[27]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Visualizing Personal Networks: Working with Participant-aided Sociograms , 2007 .

[28]  L. Ryan,et al.  Young people, school engagement and perceptions of support: a mixed methods analysis , 2019, Journal of Youth Studies.

[29]  L. Gillam,et al.  Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research , 2004 .

[30]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[31]  Alessio D'Angelo,et al.  Social network analysis: a mixed method approach , 2016 .

[32]  Susie Scott.  Revisiting the Total Institution: Performative Regulation in the Reinventive Institution , 2010 .

[33]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Social Network Research: Confusions, Criticisms, and Controversies , 2014 .

[34]  Zizi Papacharissi.  A Networked Self , 2010 .

[35]  Marco Conti,et al.  The structure of online social networks mirrors those in the offline world , 2015, Soc. Networks.

[36]  L. Ryan,et al.  Social Networks, Social Support and Social Capital: The Experiences of Recent Polish Migrants in London , 2008 .

[37]  L. Freeman.  Filling in the Blanks: A Theory of Cognitive Categories and the Structure of Social Affiliation , 1992 .

[38]  Jennifer Hauck,et al.  Net-Map: Collecting Social Network Data and Facilitating Network Learning through Participatory Influence Network Mapping , 2010 .

[40]  Paola Tubaro,et al.  Eliciting Personal Network Data in Web Surveys through Participant-generated Sociograms , 2014 .

[41]  Charles Kadushin,et al.  Who benefits from network analysis: ethics of social network research , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[42]  B. Hogan.  The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online , 2010 .

[43]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[44]  E. Goffman.  Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order , 1971 .

[45]  A. Fuller,et al.  Chasing shadows: defining network boundaries in qualitative social network analysis , 2009 .

[46]  C. McCarty,et al.  Mixed Methods Social Networks Research: Giving Meaning to Social Networks , 2014 .

[47]  K. Davis.  Tensions of identity in a networked era: Young people’s perspectives on the risks and rewards of online self-expression , 2012, New Media Soc..