Assembly work in Indonesia and in Sweden--ergonomics, health and satisfaction.

Work conditions in industrial production vary substantially between different cultures. In the present study the aims were to identify differences between Swedish and Indonesian assembly industry workers regarding work environment factors, health and job satisfaction, and to find associations between work environment factors, and the health measures. Data were collected by a questionnaire from 326 Swedish and 136 Indonesian assembly industry workers, interviews and from company documents. The prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms was high in both groups. Stress and psychosomatic symptoms had higher prevalences in the Swedish group, which also rated their work conditions as worse in most respects. Work tasks were physically heavier in Indonesia, but less monotonous and with lower demands on productivity. The Indonesians were more satisfied with their jobs. Physical job demands were associated with musculoskeletal symptoms. Competence development was associated with increased job satisfaction. Conflicts and harassments at work were associated with stress and psychosomatic symptoms. Job pressure, especially deficient planning of the jobs was associated with lower job satisfaction, psychosomatic and stress symptoms in the Swedish group. Implications for job design in the two cultures are presented.

[1]  B. Jonsson,et al.  Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. , 1987, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  Tommy Hansson,et al.  Psychological and physiological stress responses during repetitive work at an assembly line , 1989 .

[3]  Charles R. McClure,et al.  Encyclopedia of occupational health and safety: Third Edition, 2 Volumes Geneva: International Labour Office, 1983, 2538 pages, $155.00. ISBN 92-2-103291-4 , 1985 .

[4]  C. Hagert,et al.  Sickness Absenteeism in an Engineering Industry—an Analysis with Special Reference to Absence for Neck and Upper Extremity Symptoms , 1989, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[5]  K Ekberg,et al.  Cross-sectional study of risk factors for symptoms in the neck and shoulder area. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[6]  Physical therapy and rehabilitation. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[7]  M. Hagberg,et al.  The effects of different pause types on neck and shoulder EMG activity during VDU work. , 1989, Ergonomics.

[8]  S. Linton,et al.  Risk factors for neck and back pain in a working population in Sweden , 1990 .

[9]  M. Hagberg,et al.  Prevalence rates and odds ratios of shoulder-neck diseases in different occupational groups. , 1987, British journal of industrial medicine.

[10]  O. Axelson,et al.  Case-control study of risk factors for disease in the neck and shoulder area. , 1994, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[11]  R G Attewell,et al.  An assessment of neck and upper extremity disorders by questionnaire and clinical examination. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[12]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Healthy Work : Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life , 1990 .

[13]  G. Andersson.  Epidemiologic Aspects on Low-Back Pain in Industry , 1981, Spine.

[14]  M Frankenhaeuser,et al.  Pituitary-adrenal and sympathetic-adrenal correlates of distress and effort. , 1980, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[15]  C. E. Dickinson,et al.  Questionnaire development: an examination of the Nordic Musculoskeletal questionnaire. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  V. H. Hildebrandt,et al.  Psychosocial factors at work and musculoskeletal disease. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[17]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign , 1979 .

[18]  Pranee Chavalitsakulchai.  Ergonomics for the improvement of health and safety of female workers in industrially developing countries , 1992 .

[19]  I. Kuorinka,et al.  Occupational rheumatic diseases and upper limb strain in manual jobs in a light mechanical industry. , 1979, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.