Decisions are expedited through multiple neural adjustments spanning the sensorimotor hierarchy

[1]  A. Blangero,et al.  Dynamic Interplay of Value and Sensory Information in High-Speed Decision Making , 2018, Current Biology.

[2]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Borís Burle,et al.  Beyond decision! Motor contribution to speed–accuracy trade-off in decision-making , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Peter R Murphy,et al.  Global gain modulation generates time-dependent urgency during perceptual choice in humans , 2016, Nature Communications.

[5]  D. McCormick,et al.  Pupil fluctuations track rapid changes in adrenergic and cholinergic activity in cortex , 2016, Nature Communications.

[6]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Neuronal Mechanisms of Visual Categorization: An Abstract View on Decision Making. , 2016, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  Simon P. Kelly,et al.  Abstract and Effector-Selective Decision Signals Exhibit Qualitatively Distinct Dynamics before Delayed Perceptual Reports , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  P. Cisek,et al.  Modulation of Premotor and Primary Motor Cortical Activity during Volitional Adjustments of Speed-Accuracy Trade-Offs , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Gold,et al.  Relationships between Pupil Diameter and Neuronal Activity in the Locus Coeruleus, Colliculi, and Cingulate Cortex , 2016, Neuron.

[11]  Y. Niv,et al.  Amplified selectivity in cognitive processing implements the neural gain model of norepinephrine function , 2016, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  R. O’Connell,et al.  Neural evidence accumulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgments , 2015, eLife.

[13]  Anthony M. Norcia,et al.  Cortical Components of Reaction-Time during Perceptual Decisions in Humans , 2015, PloS one.

[14]  D. Bates,et al.  Balancing Type I Error and Power in Linear Mixed Models , 2015, 1511.01864.

[15]  Borís Burle,et al.  Using Covert Response Activation to Test Latent Assumptions of Formal Decision-Making Models in Humans , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Mara Mather,et al.  Cognitive control, dynamic salience, and the imperative toward computational accounts of neuromodulatory function , 2015, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  Stephen V. David,et al.  Cortical Membrane Potential Signature of Optimal States for Sensory Signal Detection , 2015, Neuron.

[18]  M. Husain,et al.  Reward Pays the Cost of Noise Reduction in Motor and Cognitive Control , 2015, Current Biology.

[19]  D. Bates,et al.  Parsimonious Mixed Models , 2015, 1506.04967.

[20]  Annabelle Blangero,et al.  Electrophysiological indices of surround suppression in humans. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Revisiting the Evidence for Collapsing Boundaries and Urgency Signals in Perceptual Decision-Making , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Albert Compte,et al.  Sensory integration dynamics in a hierarchical network explains choice probabilities in cortical area MT , 2015, Nature Communications.

[23]  S. Kelly,et al.  The neural processes underlying perceptual decision making in humans: Recent progress and future directions , 2015, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[24]  Bingni W. Brunton,et al.  Distinct relationships of parietal and prefrontal cortices to evidence accumulation , 2014, Nature.

[25]  M. Dambacher,et al.  Time pressure affects the efficiency of perceptual processing in decisions under conflict , 2014, Psychological Research.

[26]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  An Extra Dimension to Decision-Making in Animals: The Three-way Trade-off between Speed, Effort per-Unit-Time and Accuracy , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Joachim Vandekerckhove,et al.  Pupil-Linked Arousal Determines Variability in Perceptual Decision Making , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  Roozbeh Kiani,et al.  A neural mechanism of speed-accuracy tradeoff in macaque area LIP , 2014, eLife.

[29]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Patrick Simen,et al.  Speed accuracy trade-off under response deadlines , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[31]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Lateralized Readiness Potentials Reveal Properties of a Neural Mechanism for Implementing a Decision Threshold , 2014, PloS one.

[32]  Laurent Itti,et al.  Transient Pupil Response Is Modulated by Contrast-Based Saliency , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  B. Burle,et al.  Distributional reaction time properties in the Eriksen task: marked differences or hidden similarities with the Simon task? , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  S. Kelly,et al.  Internal and External Influences on the Rate of Sensory Evidence Accumulation in the Human Brain , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Neural chronometry and coherency across speed–accuracy demands reveal lack of homomorphism between computational and neural mechanisms of evidence accumulation , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  Christian Büchel,et al.  Classic EEG motor potentials track the emergence of value-based decisions , 2013, NeuroImage.

[37]  D. Barr.  Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[38]  KongFatt Wong-Lin,et al.  Dynamic Excitatory and Inhibitory Gain Modulation Can Produce Flexible, Robust and Optimal Decision-making , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  The speed and accuracy of perceptual decisions in a random-tone pitch task , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[40]  R. Romo,et al.  Conversion of sensory signals into perceptual decisions , 2013, Progress in Neurobiology.

[41]  H. Lau,et al.  Prestimulus Oscillatory Activity over Motor Cortex Reflects Perceptual Expectations , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff , 2012, Neuron.

[43]  S. Kelly,et al.  A supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal that determines perceptual decisions in humans , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The Optimality of Sensory Processing during the Speed–Accuracy Tradeoff , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  A. Pouget,et al.  The Cost of Accumulating Evidence in Perceptual Decision Making , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  L. Selen,et al.  Deliberation in the Motor System: Reflex Gains Track Evolving Evidence Leading to a Decision , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  D. Heeger,et al.  Cross-orientation suppression in human visual cortex. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  W. Sommer,et al.  Residue iteration decomposition (RIDE): A new method to separate ERP components on the basis of latency variability in single trials. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[49]  M. Dorris,et al.  Gain Modulation by an Urgency Signal Controls the Speed–Accuracy Trade-Off in a Network Model of a Cortical Decision Circuit , 2011, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[50]  J. Gold,et al.  Distinct Representations of a Perceptual Decision and the Associated Oculomotor Plan in the Monkey Lateral Intraparietal Area , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  R. Bogacz,et al.  The neural basis of the speed–accuracy tradeoff , 2010, Trends in Neurosciences.

[52]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Changing your mind: a computational mechanism of vacillation , 2009, Nature.

[53]  Andreas K. Engel,et al.  Buildup of Choice-Predictive Activity in Human Motor Cortex during Perceptual Decision Making , 2009, Current Biology.

[54]  Philip Holmes,et al.  Optimality and Robustness of a Biophysical Decision-Making Model under Norepinephrine Modulation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Eric Shea-Brown,et al.  Optimization of Decision Making in Multilayer Networks: The Role of Locus Coeruleus , 2008, Neural Computation.

[56]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  The Neural and Computational Basis of Controlled Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff during Task Performance , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  Xiao-Jing Wang.  Decision Making in Recurrent Neuronal Circuits , 2008, Neuron.

[59]  R. Marois,et al.  fMRI Evidence for a Dual Process Account of the Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Decision-Making , 2008, PloS one.

[60]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Decision-making with multiple alternatives , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[61]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[62]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[63]  Jochen Ditterich,et al.  Stochastic models of decisions about motion direction: Behavior and physiology , 2006, Neural Networks.

[64]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Involvement of human left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in perceptual decision making is independent of response modality , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Mechanisms underlying cross-orientation suppression in cat visual cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[66]  Jürgen Kayser,et al.  Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[67]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[68]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Neural Correlates of Reaching Decisions in Dorsal Premotor Cortex: Specification of Multiple Direction Choices and Final Selection of Action , 2005, Neuron.

[69]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[70]  C. Berridge,et al.  The locus coeruleus–noradrenergic system: modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes , 2003, Brain Research Reviews.

[71]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[72]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[73]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[74]  Donald J. Woodward,et al.  Phasic activation of the locus coeruleus enhances responses of primary sensory cortical neurons to peripheral receptive field stimulation , 1998, Brain Research.

[75]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[76]  D G Pelli,et al.  Pixel independence: measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[77]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[78]  J. Schall,et al.  Neural Control of Voluntary Movement Initiation , 1996, Science.

[79]  Dhanistha Panyasak,et al.  Circuits , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[80]  J D Cohen,et al.  A network model of catecholamine effects: gain, signal-to-noise ratio, and behavior. , 1990, Science.

[81]  C. Eriksen,et al.  An electromyographic examination of response competition , 1985 .

[82]  F E Bloom,et al.  Noradrenergic and serotonergic fibers innervate complementary layers in monkey primary visual cortex: an immunohistochemical study. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[83]  James L. McClelland.  On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[84]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupillometry: The Psychology of the Pupillary Response , 1978 .

[85]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. , 1977, Science.

[86]  P. H. Lindsay.  Human Information Processing , 1977 .

[87]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[88]  G. Briggs,et al.  Information processing as a function of speed versus accuracy , 1969 .