Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Scarborough. Memory for brief visual displays of symbols , 1972 .
[2] Derek Besner,et al. On the relationship between orthographies and phonologies in visual word recognition. , 1987 .
[3] Don L. Scarborough,et al. Frequency and Repetition Effects in Lexical Memory. , 1977 .
[4] G. C. Orden. A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading , 1987 .
[5] M. Turvey,et al. Phonological access of the lexicon: evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[6] James L. McClelland,et al. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.
[7] L. Hochhaus,et al. Different-case repetition still leads to perceptual blindness , 1988 .
[8] Robert G. Crowder,et al. The Modality Effect in Free and Serial Recall as a Function of Phonological Similarity. , 1974 .
[9] H. Hawkins,et al. Flexible coding in word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[10] Derek Besner,et al. Basic processes in reading: Two phonological codes. , 1982 .
[11] A D Baddeley,et al. Short-term Memory for Word Sequences as a Function of Acoustic, Semantic and Formal Similarity , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[12] C. Perfetti,et al. Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming , 1991 .
[13] R B Friedman,et al. Identity without form: Abstract representations of letters , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.
[14] H. Rubenstein,et al. Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition , 1971 .
[15] Derek Besner,et al. Reading for Meaning: The Effects of Concurrent Articulation* , 1981 .
[16] M Coltheart,et al. Basic processes in reading: computation of abstract letter identities. , 1984, Canadian journal of psychology.
[17] M. McCloskey,et al. Cognitive processes in verbal-number production: inferences from the performance of brain-damaged subjects. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[18] N. Kanwisher. Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation , 1987, Cognition.
[19] M. Mozer. Types and tokens in visual letter perception. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[20] Max Coltheart,et al. Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .
[21] John Morton,et al. Facilitation in Word Recognition: Experiments Causing Change in the Logogen Model , 1979 .
[22] D. J. Murray. Articulation and acoustic confusability in short-term memory. , 1968 .
[23] Kathryn T. Spoehr,et al. Phonological encoding in visual word recognition , 1978 .
[24] Charles A. Perfetti,et al. Speech Processes in Reading. , 1982 .
[25] R. Conrad,et al. Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. , 1964 .
[26] M. Potter,et al. Repetition blindness: levels of processing. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[27] Cognitive Mechanisms in Normal and Impaired Number Processing , 2018, Mathematical Disabilities.
[28] N. Kanwisher,et al. Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[29] N Kanwisher,et al. Repetition blindness: The effects of stimulus modality and spatial displacement , 1989, Memory & cognition.
[30] G. McConkie,et al. Integrating information across eye movements , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[31] Charles A. Perfetti,et al. Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking*1 , 1988 .
[32] G. Humphreys,et al. The Use of Abstract Graphemic Information in Lexical Access , 1981 .
[33] Models of Word Recognition. Technical Report No. 107. , 1978 .
[34] Derek Besner,et al. Phonology, Lexical Access in Reading, and Articulatory Suppression: A Critical Review , 1987 .
[35] G. Stone,et al. Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. , 1990, Psychological review.