JPEG compression of digital echocardiographic images: impact on image quality.

Routine echocardiograms are not handled digitally because of enormous storage needs. Image compression techniques can reduce memory requirements, but the impact on diagnostic content is unknown. We studied the effect of an internationally accepted compression algorithm called Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) on digital echocardiographic images. Diagnostic and image quality of JPEG compressed, two-dimensional echocardiograms at ratios ranging from 4:1 to 40:1 was compared with that of uncompressed images both subjectively by a blinded expert panel (540 observations) and objectively by quantitative image-processing parameters (180 images). Accuracy of 432 measurements performed on compressed M-mode and spectral Doppler tracings was determined. Simultaneously acquired videotaped images and their never-compressed digital counterparts were compared quantitatively for image fidelity. This study demonstrates that the JPEG compression algorithm produces little degradation of echocardiographic images at compression ratios of at least 20:1, with less measured distortion than is produced by videotape recording. With JPEG, digital storage and retrieval in routine echocardiography are feasible.

[1]  J D Thomas,et al.  Digital formatting standards in medical imaging: a primer for echocardiographers. , 1994, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[2]  F P Ottes.  Methodology for the evaluation of diagnostic image quality. , 1992, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[3]  P F Sharp.  Quantifying image quality. , 1990, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[4]  Gregory K. Wallace,et al.  JPEG still picture compression algorithm , 1991 .

[5]  W. D. Bidgood,et al.  Introduction to the ACR-NEMA DICOM standard. , 1992, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6]  J D Thomas,et al.  The DICOM Image Formatting Standard: what it means for echocardiographers. , 1995, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[7]  S Hattori.  Image manipulation: digital versus analog. , 1992, Endoscopy.

[8]  H Feigenbaum,et al.  Digital echocardiography in myocardial infarction. , 1992, Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine.

[9]  Lyman P. Hurd,et al.  Fractal image compression , 1993 .

[10]  P. W. Jones,et al.  Digital Image Compression Techniques , 1991 .

[11]  Glenn L. Cash,et al.  On Implementing The Jpeg Still-Picture Compression Algorithm , 1989, Other Conferences.

[12]  Christoph Zetzsche,et al.  Principal features of human vision in the context of image quality models , 1989 .

[13]  William Pearlman,et al.  Visual Communications and Image Processing IV , 1989 .

[14]  G. B. John Mancini,et al.  Cardiac angiography without cine film: erecting a "Tower of Babel" in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. American College of Cardiology Cardiac Catheterization Committee. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  H Feigenbaum,et al.  Non-invasive diagnosis of ischemic heart disease using stress thallium scintigraphy and digital exercise 2-dimensional echocardiography. , 1989, Cardiologia.

[16]  C S Kim,et al.  Dobutamine digital echocardiography for detecting coronary artery disease. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  David T. Linker,et al.  Error-free digital compression of polar coordinate echocardiographic images , 1987 .

[18]  Joan L. Mitchell,et al.  JPEG: Still Image Data Compression Standard , 1992 .