An Evidence Accumulation Model for Conflict Detection Performance in a Simulated Air Traffic Control Task

Objective: The aim of this article is to develop a formal model of conflict detection performance. Background: Our model assumes that participants iteratively sample evidence regarding the state of the world and accumulate it over time. A decision is made when the evidence reaches a threshold that changes over time in response to the increasing urgency of the task. Method: Two experiments were conducted to examine the effects of conflict geometry and timing on response proportions and response time. Results: The model is able to predict the observed pattern of response times, including a nonmonotonic relationship between distance at point of closest approach and response time, as well as effects of angle of approach and relative velocity. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that evidence accumulation models provide a good account of performance on a conflict detection task. Application: Evidence accumulation models are a form of dynamic signal detection theory, allowing for the analysis of response times as well as response proportions, and can be used for simulating human performance on dynamic decision tasks.

[1]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Visual Search in Complex Displays: Factors Affecting Conflict Detection by Air Traffic Controllers , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Richard W. Pew,et al.  Modeling human and organizational behavior : application to military simulations , 1998 .

[3]  Scott M. Galster,et al.  Air Traffic Controller Performance and Workload Under Mature Free Flight: Conflict Detection and Resolution of Aircraft Self-Separation , 2001 .

[4]  Douglas Vickers,et al.  Dynamic Models of Simple Judgments: I. Properties of a Self-Regulating Accumulator Module , 1998 .

[5]  Esa M. Rantanen,et al.  CONFLICT DETECTION IN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL: A TASK ANALYSIS, A LITERATURE REVIEW, AND A NEED FOR FURTHER RESEARCH , 2003 .

[6]  Frank J. Lee,et al.  Production Compilation: A Simple Mechanism to Model Complex Skill Acquisition , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[7]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[8]  Alphonse Chapanis,et al.  The vertical-horizontal illusion in a visually-rich environment , 1967 .

[9]  Parimal Kopardekar,et al.  Controller Workload Analysis Methodology to Predict Increases in Airspace Capacity , 2003 .

[10]  Gillian B. Yeo,et al.  A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: effects; of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Kent A. Kimball,et al.  Estimation of Intersection of Two Converging Targets as a Function of Speed and Angle of Target Movement , 1970 .

[12]  P. Todd,et al.  Environments That Make Us Smart , 2007 .

[13]  J. Gill.  Hierarchical Linear Models , 2005 .

[14]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Perceptual and cognitive factors governing performance in comparative arrival-time judgments. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  M. Steyvers,et al.  The dynamics of experimentally induced criterion shifts. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[17]  A Bisseret,et al.  Application of signal detection theory to decision making in supervisory control The effect of the operator's experience , 1981 .

[18]  S. Link,et al.  A sequential theory of psychological discrimination , 1975 .

[19]  Lisa Stolzenberg,et al.  A Multilevel Analysis of the Relationship between Labor Surplus and Pretrial Incarceration , 2002 .

[20]  Ashley Nunes,et al.  Identifying Controller Strategies that Support the ‘Picture’ , 2003 .

[21]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[22]  Gillian B. Yeo,et al.  Subjective cognitive effort: a model of states, traits, and time. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Michael Matessa,et al.  Using Apex/CPM_GOMS to develop human-like software agents , 2003 .

[24]  Esa M. Rantanen,et al.  Hierarchical Conflict Detection in Air Traffic Control , 2005 .

[25]  Shayne Loft,et al.  ATC-lab: An air traffic control simulator for the laboratory , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[26]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Fuzzy Signal Detection Theory: Basic Postulates and Formulas for Analyzing Human and Machine Performance , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[27]  Shayne Loft,et al.  An analysis of relational complexity in an air traffic control conflict detection task , 2006, Ergonomics.

[28]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. , 1997, Psychological review.

[29]  P R DeLucia,et al.  Cognitive motion extrapolation and cognitive clocking in prediction motion task. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.

[31]  C Niessen,et al.  Modelling cognitive processes of experienced air traffic controllers. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[32]  Philippe Averty,et al.  Determinants of Conflict Detection: A Model of Risk Judgments in Air Traffic Control , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[33]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: Analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  David E. Kieras,et al.  Predictive engineering models based on the EPIC architecture for a multimodal high-performance human-computer interaction task , 1997, TCHI.

[35]  Shayne Loft,et al.  The influence of memory for prior instances on performance in a conflict detection task. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[36]  Donald L. Fisher,et al.  Steps toward Building Mathematical and Computer Models from Cognitive Task Analyses , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[37]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  Returning Human Factors to an Engineering Discipline: Expanding the Science Base through a New Generation of Quantitative Methods - Preface to the Special Section , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[38]  W. T. Pollock,et al.  The Apparent Length of a Line as a Function of Its Inclination* , 1952 .

[39]  Esa M. Rantanen,et al.  Effects of Air Traffic Geometry on Pilots' Conflict Detection With Cockpit Display of Traffic Information , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[40]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Special Section: Contending with Complexity: Developing and Using a Scaled World in Applied Cognitive Research , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[41]  Kevin M. Corker,et al.  Free Flight and the Context of Control: Experiments and Modeling to Determine the Impact of Distributed Air-Ground Air Traffic Management on Safety and Procedures , 2000 .

[42]  Shayne Loft,et al.  A theory and model of conflict detection in air traffic control: incorporating environmental constraints. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[43]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[44]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  The Role of the Air Traffic Controller in Future Air Traffic Management: An Empirical Study of Active Control versus Passive Monitoring , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[45]  Klaus Eyferth,et al.  A model of air traffic controllers' conflict detection and conflict resolution , 2003 .

[46]  Shayne Loft,et al.  Modeling and Predicting Mental Workload in En Route Air Traffic Control: Critical Review and Broader Implications , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[47]  Alison McGann,et al.  Self-Separation from the Air and Ground Perspective , 1998 .