Exposing Global Cloud Biases in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) Using Satellite Observations and Their Corresponding Instrument Simulators

AbstractSatellite observations and their corresponding instrument simulators are used to document global cloud biases in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) versions 4 and 5. The model–observation comparisons show that, despite having nearly identical cloud radiative forcing, CAM5 has a much more realistic representation of cloud properties than CAM4. In particular, CAM5 exhibits substantial improvement in three long-standing climate model cloud biases: 1) the underestimation of total cloud, 2) the overestimation of optically thick cloud, and 3) the underestimation of midlevel cloud. While the increased total cloud and decreased optically thick cloud in CAM5 result from improved physical process representation, the increased midlevel cloud in CAM5 results from the addition of radiatively active snow. Despite these improvements, both CAM versions have cloud deficiencies. Of particular concern, both models exhibit large but differing biases in the subtropical marine boundary layer cloud regimes that are kn...

[1]  William D. Collins,et al.  Parameterization of Generalized Cloud Overlap for Radiative Calculations in General Circulation Models , 2001 .

[2]  K. Taylor.  Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram , 2001 .

[3]  João Paulo Ramos Teixeira,et al.  Tropical and Subtropical Cloud Transitions in Weather and Climate Prediction Models: The GCSS/WGNE Pacific Cross-Section Intercomparison (GPCI) , 2011 .

[4]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  Cloud influence on and response to seasonal Arctic sea ice loss , 2009 .

[5]  S. Bony,et al.  Combining ERBE and ISCCP data to assess clouds in the Hadley Centre, ECMWF and LMD atmospheric climate models , 2001 .

[6]  Richard H. Johnson,et al.  Trimodal Characteristics of Tropical Convection , 1999 .

[7]  A. Lacis,et al.  Near-Global Survey of Effective Droplet Radii in Liquid Water Clouds Using ISCCP Data. , 1994 .

[8]  Takashi Nakajima,et al.  Impact of different definitions of clear-sky flux on the determination of longwave cloud radiative forcing: NICAM simulation results , 2010 .

[9]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of Clouds and Their Radiative Effects Simulated by the NCAR Community Atmospheric Model Against Satellite Observations , 2004 .

[10]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and numerical tests , 2008 .

[11]  K. Salzen,et al.  Assessing Simulated Clouds and Radiative Fluxes Using Properties of Clouds Whose Tops are Exposed to Space , 2011 .

[12]  S. Bony,et al.  Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models , 2005 .

[13]  James J. Hack,et al.  Evaluation of Forecasted Southeast Pacific Stratocumulus in the NCAR, GFDL, and ECMWF Models , 2008 .

[14]  Stephen A. Klein,et al.  Computing and Partitioning Cloud Feedbacks Using Cloud Property Histograms. Part I: Cloud Radiative Kernels , 2012 .

[15]  C. Bretherton,et al.  A New Moist Turbulence Parameterization in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2009 .

[16]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[17]  G. Tselioudis,et al.  Objective identification of cloud regimes in the Tropical Western Pacific , 2003 .

[18]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Aquaplanets, Climate Sensitivity, and Low Clouds , 2008 .

[19]  R. D. Cess.  Comparison of general circulation models , 2008 .

[20]  S. Klein,et al.  Global simulations of ice nucleation and ice supersaturation with an improved cloud scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2010 .

[21]  John M. Haynes,et al.  COSP: Satellite simulation software for model assessment , 2011 .

[22]  Albert A. M. Holtslag,et al.  Local Versus Nonlocal Boundary-Layer Diffusion in a Global Climate Model , 1993 .

[23]  W. Collins,et al.  Radiative forcing by long‐lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models , 2008 .

[24]  G. Tselioudis,et al.  Cloud and Radiation Variations Associated with Northern Midlatitude Low and High Sea Level Pressure Regimes , 2000 .

[25]  H. Chepfer,et al.  Evaluation of MM5 Optically Thin Clouds over Europe in Fall Using ICESat Lidar Spaceborne Observations , 2007 .

[26]  J. Kay,et al.  The Boundary Layer Response to Recent Arctic Sea Ice Loss and Implications for High-Latitude Climate Feedbacks , 2011 .

[27]  Robin J. Hogan,et al.  Comparison of ECMWF Winter-Season Cloud Fraction with Radar-Derived Values , 2001 .

[28]  William B. Rossow,et al.  Tropical climate described as a distribution of weather states indicated by distinct mesoscale cloud property mixtures , 2005 .

[29]  M. Miller,et al.  Threshold radar reflectivity for drizzling clouds , 2008 .

[30]  William J. Collins,et al.  Toward a minimal representation of aerosol direct and indirect effects: model description and evaluation , 2011 .

[31]  S. Klein,et al.  Validation and Sensitivities of Frontal Clouds Simulated by the ECMWF Model , 1999 .

[32]  R. Neale,et al.  The Impact of Convection on ENSO: From a Delayed Oscillator to a Series of Events , 2008 .

[33]  Christopher P. Weaver,et al.  Improved Techniques for Evaluating GCM Cloudiness Applied to the NCAR CCM3 , 2001 .

[34]  Bretherton,et al.  CFMIP: Towards a better evaluation and understanding of clouds and cloud feedbacks in CMIP5 models , 2011 .

[35]  A. Bodas‐Salcedo,et al.  Dreary state of precipitation in global models , 2010 .

[36]  S. Bony,et al.  Comparing clouds and their seasonal variations in 10 atmospheric general circulation models with satellite measurements , 2005 .

[37]  S. Klein,et al.  Evaluation of tropical cloud and precipitation statistics of Community Atmosphere Model version 3 using CloudSat and CALIPSO data , 2010 .

[38]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  A Comparison of the CCM3 Model Climate Using Diagnosed and Predicted Condensate Parameterizations , 1998 .

[39]  C. Bretherton,et al.  The University of Washington Shallow Convection and Moist Turbulence Schemes and Their Impact on Climate Simulations with the Community Atmosphere Model , 2009 .

[40]  Damian R. Wilson,et al.  Evaluating cloud systems in the Met Office global forecast model using simulated CloudSat radar reflectivities , 2008 .

[41]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in Version 4 of the Community Land Model , 2011 .

[42]  David R. Doelling,et al.  Toward Optimal Closure of the Earth's Top-of-Atmosphere Radiation Budget , 2009 .

[43]  K. Trenberth,et al.  Simulation of Present-Day and Twenty-First-Century Energy Budgets of the Southern Oceans , 2010 .

[44]  S. Vavrus,et al.  An Improved Parameterization for Simulating Arctic Cloud Amount in the CCSM3 Climate Model , 2008 .

[45]  V. Canuto,et al.  Present-Day Atmospheric Simulations Using GISS ModelE: Comparison to In Situ, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data , 2006 .

[46]  W. Rossow,et al.  Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP , 1999 .

[47]  Tristan L'Ecuyer,et al.  The impact of precipitating ice and snow on the radiation balance in global climate models , 2010 .

[48]  Ramaswamy,et al.  The dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component AM3 of the GFDL global coupled model CM3 , 2011 .

[49]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  The MODIS cloud products: algorithms and examples from Terra , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[50]  J. Hack.  Parameterization of moist convection in the National Center for Atmospheric Research community climate model (CCM2) , 1994 .

[51]  B. Barkstrom,et al.  Cloud-Radiative Forcing and Climate: Results from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment , 1989, Science.

[52]  Robert Pincus,et al.  Reconciling Simulated and Observed Views of Clouds: MODIS, ISCCP, and the Limits of Instrument Simulators in Climate Models , 2011 .

[53]  S. Bony,et al.  Use of CALIPSO lidar observations to evaluate the cloudiness simulated by a climate model , 2008 .

[54]  Steven Platnick,et al.  An assessment of differences between cloud effective particle radius retrievals for marine water clouds from three MODIS spectral bands , 2011 .

[55]  M. Webb,et al.  A quantitative performance assessment of cloud regimes in climate models , 2009 .

[56]  David L. Williamson,et al.  Southeast Pacific Stratocumulus in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2012 .

[57]  James J. Hack,et al.  A New Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Boundary Dataset for the Community Atmosphere Model , 2008 .

[58]  J. Kay,et al.  A Characterization of the Present-Day Arctic Atmosphere in CCSM4 , 2012 .

[59]  Gerald G. Mace,et al.  Critical Evaluation of the ISCCP Simulator Using Ground-Based Remote Sensing Data , 2009 .

[60]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  The Evolution of Climate Sensitivity and Climate Feedbacks in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2012 .

[61]  S. Bony,et al.  The GCM‐Oriented CALIPSO Cloud Product (CALIPSO‐GOCCP) , 2010 .