High research productivity in vertically undifferentiated higher education systems: Who are the top performers?

The growing scholarly interest in research top performers comes from the growing policy interest in research top performance itself. A question emerges: what makes someone a top performer? In this paper, the upper 10% of Polish academics in terms of research productivity are studied, and predictors of entering this class are sought. In the science system (and Poland follows global patterns), a small number of scholars produce most of the works and attract huge numbers of citations. Performance determines rewards, and small differences in talent translate into a disproportionate level of success, leading to inequalities in resources, research outcomes, and rewards. Top performers are studied here through a bivariate analysis of their working time distribution and their academic role orientation, as well as through a model approach. Odds ratio estimates with logistic regression of being highly productive Polish academics are presented. Consistently across major clusters of academic disciplines, the tiny minority of 10% of academics produces about half (44.7%) of all Polish publications (48.0% of publications in English and 57.2% of internationally co-authored publications). The mean research productivity of top performers across major clusters is on average 7.3 times higher than that of the other academics, and in terms of internationally co-authored publications, 12.07 times higher. High inequality was observed: the average research productivity distribution is highly skewed with a long tail on the right not only for all Polish academics but also for top performers. The class of top performers is as internally stratified as that of their lower-performing colleagues. Separate regression models for all academics, science, technology, engineering and mathematics academics, and social sciences and humanities academics are built based on a large national sample (2525 usable observations), and implications are discussed.

[1]  Svein Kyvik,et al.  Individual Differences in Faculty Research Time Allocations Across 13 Countries , 2012, Research in Higher Education.

[2]  M. F. Fox.  Publication Productivity among Scientists: A Critical Review , 1983 .

[3]  Dominik Antonowicz,et al.  Opening the gates or coping with the flow? Governing access to higher education in Northern and Central Europe , 2015 .

[4]  Rajshree Agarwal,et al.  Industry or Academia, Basic or Applied? Career Choices and Earnings Trajectories of Scientists , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[5]  William Locke,et al.  The United Kingdom: Academic Retreat or Professional Renewal? , 2011 .

[6]  P. Allison.  Inequality and Scientific Productivity , 1980 .

[7]  A. Agrawal,et al.  How stars matter: Recruiting and peer effects in evolutionary biology , 2017 .

[8]  Nitza Davidovitch,et al.  The law of limited excellence: publication productivity of Israel Prize laureates in the life and exact sciences , 2017, Scientometrics.

[9]  D. Crane.  Scientists at major and minor universities: a study of productivity and recognition. , 1965, American sociological review.

[10]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Let’s Call a Star a Star: Task Performance, External Status, and Exceptional Contributors in Organizations , 2018 .

[11]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[12]  Abbey Hyde,et al.  The Research Function of the Academic Profession in Europe , 2013 .

[13]  R. Groves.  Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys , 2006 .

[14]  Mónica Marquina,et al.  The Academic Profession: The Dynamics of Emerging Countries , 2015 .

[15]  Sherwood J. B. Sugden,et al.  The Revolt of the Masses , 1933 .

[16]  Katarina Prpic,et al.  Characteristics and determinants of eminent scientists' productivity , 2005, Scientometrics.

[17]  Qiang Zhi,et al.  Dancing with the academic elite: a promotion or hindrance of research production? , 2016, Scientometrics.

[18]  H. Echols.  Scientific Community , 1972, Nature.

[19]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Social Stratification in Science , 1974 .

[20]  Renata Siemieńska,et al.  Polish Higher Education: From State Toward Market, from Elite to Mass Education , 2012 .

[21]  Kenneth A. Kiewra,et al.  Conversations with Four Highly Productive Educational Psychologists: Patricia Alexander, Richard Mayer, Dale Schunk, and Barry Zimmerman , 2013 .

[22]  Kenneth A. Kiewra,et al.  Conversations with Three Highly Productive Educational Psychologists: Richard Anderson, Richard Mayer, and Michael Pressley , 2000 .

[23]  Fredrik Niclas Piro,et al.  How does prolific professors influence on the citation impact of their university departments? , 2016, Scientometrics.

[24]  Svein Kyvik,et al.  Productivity differences fields of learning, and Lotka's law , 1989, Scientometrics.

[25]  W. Cummings,et al.  The Changing Academic Profession: Major Findings of a Comparative Survey , 2013 .

[26]  P. Allison,et al.  Productivity Differences Among Scientists: Evidence for Accumulative Advantage , 1974 .

[27]  Jisun Jung,et al.  Research productivity by career stage among Korean academics , 2014 .

[28]  J. R. Cole,et al.  Scientific output and recognition: a study in the operation of the reward system in science. , 1967, American sociological review.

[29]  Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez,et al.  Within- and between-department variability in individual productivity: the case of economics , 2015, Scientometrics.

[30]  Alfred J. Lotka,et al.  The frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1926 .

[31]  Svein Kyvik,et al.  Age and scientific productivity. Differences between fields of learning , 1990 .

[32]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  THE BEST AND THE REST: REVISITING THE NORM OF NORMALITY OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE , 2012 .

[33]  A. Bryman.  Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[34]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Research Productivity over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists , 1991 .

[35]  Aleksandra Parteka,et al.  Scientific Productivity of Public Higher Education Institutions in Poland: A Comperative Bibliometric Analysis , 2010 .

[36]  Donald F. Westerheijden,et al.  The Government Response to the Private Sector Expansion in Poland , 2017 .

[37]  Randy G. Floyd,et al.  Strategies and attributes of highly productive scholars and contributors to the school psychology literature: recommendations for increasing scholarly productivity. , 2011, Journal of school psychology.

[38]  William K. Cummings,et al.  Scholars in the Changing American Academy: New Contexts, New Rules and New Roles , 2011 .

[39]  Kenneth Hudson,et al.  Common Survey Sampling Techniques , 2012 .

[40]  M. Kwiek.  The European research elite: a cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries , 2016 .

[41]  Gustavo S. Mesch,et al.  E-Mail Surveys , 2012 .

[42]  G. Postiglione,et al.  World-Class University and Asia’s Top Tier Researchers , 2013 .

[43]  Teresa Carvalho,et al.  The Study of the Academic Profession – Contributions from and to the Sociology of Professions , 2017 .

[44]  Akira Arimoto.  Japan: Effects of Changing Governance and Management on the Academic Profession , 2011 .

[45]  Hans Vossensteyn,et al.  Access and Expansion Post-Massification: Opportunities and Barriers to Further Growth in Higher Education Participation , 2016 .

[46]  Erin A. Orrick,et al.  The Most Prolific Female Scholars in Elite Criminology and Criminal Justice Journals, 2000-2010 , 2013 .

[47]  Marek Kwiek.  A Generational Divide in the Polish Academic Profession. A Mixed Quantitative and Qualitative Approach , 2017 .

[48]  Jung Cheol Shin,et al.  Multilevel analysis of academic publishing across disciplines: research preference, collaboration, and time on research , 2010, Scientometrics.

[49]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[50]  Fredrik Niclas Piro,et al.  A macro analysis of productivity differences across fields: Challenges in the measurement of scientific publishing , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[51]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Stratification in American Science , 1970 .

[52]  Per O. Seglen,et al.  The Skewness of Science , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[53]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  Publication rate expressed by age, gender and academic position - A large-scale analysis of Norwegian academic staff , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[54]  M. Mayrath.  Attributions of Productive Authors in Educational Psychology Journals , 2008 .

[55]  Marek Kwiek,et al.  Academic top earners. Research productivity, prestige generation, and salary patterns in European universities , 2018 .

[56]  Susan McNeeley,et al.  Sensitive Issues in Surveys: Reducing Refusals While Increasing Reliability and Quality of Responses to Sensitive Survey Items , 2012 .

[57]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  An investigation on the skewness patterns and fractal nature of research productivity distributions at field and discipline level , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[58]  Andrey Lovakov,et al.  Academic Inbreeding and Research Productivity of Russian Faculty Members , 2016 .

[59]  Thomas A. DiPrete,et al.  Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments , 2006 .

[60]  M. H. MacRoberts,et al.  A Re-evaluation of Lotka's Law of Scientific Productivity , 1982 .

[61]  Abraham E. Flanigan,et al.  Conversations with Four Highly Productive German Educational Psychologists: Frank Fischer, Hans Gruber, Heinz Mandl, and Alexander Renkl , 2018 .

[62]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Industry funding and university professors' research performance , 2005 .

[63]  Neville W. Goodman,et al.  Competition in science , 1993, Nature.

[64]  Jerry G. Thursby,et al.  Are There Real Effects of Licensing on Academic Research? A Life Cycle View , 2005 .

[65]  Michele Rostan,et al.  Concepts and Methods , 2014 .

[66]  R. Veugelers,et al.  Top Research Productivity and Its Persistence: Gender as a Double-Edged Sword , 2013, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[67]  Pedro Albarrán,et al.  The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates , 2010, Scientometrics.

[68]  E. D. Weert,et al.  The Changing Balance of Teaching and Research in the Dutch Binary Higher Education System , 2014 .

[69]  Karolin Baecker.  Scholars In The Changing American Academy New Contexts New Rules And New Roles , 2016 .

[70]  P. Ramsden.  Describing and explaining research productivity , 1994 .

[71]  Marek Kwiek,et al.  From Privatization (of the Expansion Era) to De-privatization (of the Contraction Era): A National Counter-Trend in a Global Context , 2016 .

[72]  R. Tewksbury,et al.  Criminology and Criminal Justice Hit Parade: Measuring Academic Productivity in the Discipline , 2012 .

[73]  W. Cummings,et al.  The Changing Academic Profession , 2013 .

[74]  Andrés Mora-Valencia,et al.  The productivity of top researchers: a semi-nonparametric approach , 2016, Scientometrics.

[75]  Svein Kyvik,et al.  Explaining the increase in publication productivity among academic staff: a generational perspective , 2015 .

[76]  Peter James Bentley,et al.  Cross-country differences in publishing productivity of academics in research universities , 2014, Scientometrics.

[77]  Stephen J. Bensman,et al.  Lotka's inverse square law of scientific productivity: Its methods and statistics , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[78]  M. Finkelstein.  THE STUDY OF ACADEMIC CAREERS: LOOKING BACK, LOOKING FORWARD , 2006 .

[79]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  How long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline: evidence from Italy , 2017, Scientometrics.

[80]  Russell K. Schutt,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 2011 .

[81]  Lisa A. Burke,et al.  What makes a “research star”? Factors influencing the research productivity of business faculty , 2012 .

[82]  I. Stoop.  Unit Non-Response Due to Refusal , 2012 .

[83]  Mary Frank Fox,et al.  Research, Teaching, and Publication Productivity: Mutuality Versus Competition in Academia. , 1992 .

[84]  M. Kwiek.  The Internationalization of Research in Europe , 2015 .

[85]  W. Cummings,et al.  Changing Governance and Management in Higher Education: The Perspectives of the Academy , 2011 .

[86]  Marek Kwiek,et al.  Changing Higher Education Policies: From the Deinstitutionalization to the Reinstitutionalization of the Research Mission in Polish Universities (CPP RPS 33/2012) , 2012 .

[87]  R. Perrucci,et al.  From Little Science to Big Science , 2017 .

[88]  Marek Kwiek,et al.  The unfading power of collegiality? University governance in Poland in a European comparative and quantitative perspective , 2015 .

[89]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  The skewness of scientific productivity , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[90]  Hugo Horta,et al.  The Impact of Publishing During PhD Studies on Career Research Publication, Visibility, and Collaborations , 2016 .

[91]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The contribution of star scientists to overall sex differences in research productivity , 2009, Scientometrics.

[92]  G. David Garson,et al.  Research Designs , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[93]  S. Rosen.  The Economics of Superstars , 1981 .

[94]  Yannis Manolopoulos,et al.  Gazing at the skyline for star scientists , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[95]  J. Ruiz-Castillo,et al.  The Evolution of the Scientific Productivity of Highly Productive Economists , 2014 .

[96]  Amy Scott Metcalfe,et al.  Teaching, Research, and the Canadian Professoriate , 2014 .

[97]  Emanuel Kulczycki,et al.  Toward an excellence-based research funding system: Evidence from Poland , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[98]  Wesley G. Jennings,et al.  Re‐Assessing Publication Productivity among Academic “Stars” in Criminology and Criminal Justice , 2011 .

[99]  Nick Bontis,et al.  The superstar phenomenon in the knowledge management and intellectual capital academic discipline , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[100]  Erin A. Cech,et al.  How Economics Shapes Science , 2013 .

[101]  C. Martin,et al.  SA science and technology indicators , 1994 .

[102]  Michael Roach,et al.  A Taste for Science? PhD Scientists’ Academic Orientation and Self-Selection into Research Careers in Industry , 2010 .

[103]  AbramoGiovanni,et al.  How long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline , 2017 .

[104]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  THE BEST AND THE REST: REVISITING THE NORM OF NORMALITY OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE , 2012 .

[105]  Ulrich Teichler,et al.  The work situation of the academic profession in Europe: findings of a survey in twelve countries , 2013 .

[106]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Star Performers in Twenty‐First Century Organizations , 2014 .

[107]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Characterizing a scientific elite: the social characteristics of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology , 2010, Scientometrics.

[108]  Marek Kwiek,et al.  International Research Collaboration and International Research Orientation: Comparative Findings About European Academics , 2018 .

[109]  Yu Xie,et al.  “Undemocracy”: inequalities in science , 2014, Science.

[110]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  CUMULATIVE ADVANTAGE: CONDUCTORS AND INSULATORS OF HEAVY-TAILED PRODUCTIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS AND PRODUCTIVITY STARS , 2016 .

[111]  Ying Cheng,et al.  Building World-Class Universities: Different Approaches to a Shared Goal , 2012 .

[112]  William K. Cummings,et al.  Scholars in the Changing American Academy , 2012 .

[113]  Jordi Molas-Gallart,et al.  Measuring Personal Networks and Their Relationship with Scientific Production , 2013 .

[114]  D. Teodorescu.  Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis , 2000 .

[115]  Tindaro Cicero,et al.  The impact of unproductive and top researchers on overall university research performance , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[116]  D. D. Vaus,et al.  Surveys in Social Research , 1991 .

[117]  Jung Cheol Shin,et al.  Teaching and Research of Korean Academics Across Career Stages , 2014 .

[118]  L. Gideon.  Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences , 2012 .

[119]  Robert K. Toutkoushian,et al.  Using Publications Counts to Measure an Institution's Research Productivity , 2003 .

[120]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time. , 1993 .

[121]  Jay R. Dee,et al.  Understanding Academic Work in a Changing Institutional Environment , 2012 .

[122]  Emanuel Kulczycki,et al.  Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: The case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in Poland , 2017 .

[123]  Branka Golub.  The croatian scientific elite and its socio-professional roots , 2006, Scientometrics.

[124]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Characterizing a scientific elite (B): publication and citation patterns of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology , 2012, Scientometrics.

[125]  Marek Kwiek,et al.  Academic generations and academic work: patterns of attitudes, behaviors, and research productivity of Polish academics after 1989 , 2015 .

[126]  Joseph C. Hermanowicz.  What Does It Take to Be Successful? , 2006 .