Modeling studies on irregular motor unit potentials

OBJECTIVE The aim of these modeling studies on the generation of motor unit potentials (MUPs) was to establish the influence of MU parameters and recording conditions on the shape irregularity of MUPs. The focus was on the dependence of the irregularity of MUPs on fiber density, fiber diameters and the recording distance from the end-plate zone. METHODS The study was performed using the 'EMG Simulator' software for modeling of MUP and our own software for calculations. RESULTS The results indicate that the irregularity of a MUP increases with increased recording distance from the end-plate zone and decreases with increased fiber diameter and/or with increased fiber density. The quantitative relationship between these factors has been derived. CONCLUSIONS The relationships determine the structural conditions in which irregular potential may be generated and therefore may be helpful in the interpretation of atypical MUPs.

[1]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  Evaluation of an automatic method of measuring features of motor unit action potentials , 1989, Muscle & nerve.

[2]  Steen Andreassen,et al.  Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials , 1988, Muscle & nerve.

[3]  E Stålberg,et al.  The ability of MUP parameters to discriminate between normal and neurogenic MUPs in concentric EMG: analysis of the MUP "thickness" and the proposal of "size index". , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  R. Lovelace,et al.  Long‐duration polyphasic motor unit potentials in myopathies: A quantitative study with pathological correlation , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[5]  Erik Stålberg,et al.  Simulation of EMG in pathological situations , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  F Buchthal,et al.  The diagnostic yield of quantified electromyography and quantified muscle biopsy in neuromuscular disorders , 1982, Muscle & nerve.

[7]  E Zalewska,et al.  Global and detailed features of motor unit potential in myogenic and neurogenic disorders. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  E Stålberg,et al.  Simulation of the normal concentric needle electromyogram by using a muscle model , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  Erik Stålberg,et al.  The motor nerve simulator , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  Action potential parameters in normal human muscle and their dependence on physical variables. , 1954, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[11]  Shape irregularity of motor unit potentials in some neuromuscular disorders , 1998, Muscle & nerve.

[12]  E. Zalewska,et al.  Evaluation of MUAP shape irregularity-a new concept of quantification , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  Analysis of amplitude and area of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  S. Andreassen,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Individual Motor Unit Potentials: A Proposition for Standardized Terminology and Criteria for Measurement , 1986, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[15]  S. Nandedkar,et al.  Simulation of single muscle fibre action potentials , 1983, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[16]  Ewa Zalewska,et al.  Effectiveness of motor unit potentials classification using various parameters and indexes , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  EMG of reinnervated motor units: a simulation study. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  K Kunze,et al.  Turn and phase counts of individual motor unit potentials: correlation and reliability. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  Simulation of myopathic motor unit action potentials , 1989, Muscle & nerve.