Biomolecular Ultrasound and Sonogenetics.

Visualizing and modulating molecular and cellular processes occurring deep within living organisms is fundamental to our study of basic biology and disease. Currently, the most sophisticated tools available to dynamically monitor and control cellular events rely on light-responsive proteins, which are difficult to use outside of optically transparent model systems, cultured cells, or surgically accessed regions owing to strong scattering of light by biological tissue. In contrast, ultrasound is a widely used medical imaging and therapeutic modality that enables the observation and perturbation of internal anatomy and physiology but has historically had limited ability to monitor and control specific cellular processes. Recent advances are beginning to address this limitation through the development of biomolecular tools that allow ultrasound to connect directly to cellular functions such as gene expression. Driven by the discovery and engineering of new contrast agents, reporter genes, and bioswitches, the nascent field of biomolecular ultrasound carries a wave of exciting opportunities.

[1]  R. Cobbold Foundations of Biomedical Ultrasound , 2006 .

[2]  L. Sistonen,et al.  Regulation of HSF1 function in the heat stress response: implications in aging and disease. , 2011, Annual review of biochemistry.

[3]  M. Strong,et al.  High Threshold for Induction of the Stress Response in Motor Neurons Is Associated with Failure to Activate HSF1 , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Audrey Lee-Gosselin,et al.  Acoustic reporter genes for noninvasive imaging of microbes in mammalian hosts , 2017, Nature.

[5]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Ultrafast imaging in biomedical ultrasound , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[6]  Elisa E Konofagou,et al.  Enhanced Delivery and Bioactivity of the Neurturin Neurotrophic Factor through Focused Ultrasound—Mediated Blood—Brain Barrier Opening in vivo , 2015, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[7]  D. A. Christopher,et al.  Advances in ultrasound biomicroscopy. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  Cheri X Deng,et al.  Activation of a Bacterial Mechanosensitive Channel in Mammalian Cells by Cytoskeletal Stress , 2014, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[9]  Mikhail G. Shapiro,et al.  Acoustically modulated magnetic resonance imaging of gas-filled protein nanostructures , 2018, Nature Materials.

[10]  Yijia Pan,et al.  Mechanogenetics for the remote and noninvasive control of cancer immunotherapy , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Jeremy P. Sauer,et al.  Remote regulation of glucose homeostasis in mice using genetically encoded nanoparticles , 2014, Nature Medicine.

[12]  Michael C. Kolios,et al.  High frequency ultrasound tissue characterization and acoustic microscopy of intracellular changes. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  S. DasSarma,et al.  Cassette-based presentation of SIV epitopes with recombinant gas vesicles from halophilic archaea. , 2004, Journal of biotechnology.

[14]  Elisa E Konofagou,et al.  The Size of Blood–Brain Barrier Opening Induced by Focused Ultrasound is Dictated by the Acoustic Pressure , 2014, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[15]  T. Uchida,et al.  High‐intensity focused ultrasound therapy for prostate cancer , 2012, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[16]  V. Zharov,et al.  In vivo acoustic and photoacoustic focusing of circulating cells , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Junjie Yao,et al.  Multi-scale photoacoustic tomography using reversibly switchable bacterial phytochrome as a near-infrared photochromic probe , 2015, Nature Methods.

[18]  R M Lang,et al.  Combined Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Regional Left Ventricular Function by Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Power Modulation Images , 2001, Circulation.

[19]  Natalia Vykhodtseva,et al.  500‐element ultrasound phased array system for noninvasive focal surgery of the brain: A preliminary rabbit study with ex vivo human skulls , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Heng Huang,et al.  Remote control of ion channels and neurons through magnetic-field heating of nanoparticles. , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[21]  N de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound contrast imaging: current and new potential methods. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  Thomas Laurell,et al.  Acoustic radiation- and streaming-induced microparticle velocities determined by microparticle image velocimetry in an ultrasound symmetry plane. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Mikael Evander,et al.  Acoustofluidics 20: applications in acoustic trapping. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[24]  C. Moonen,et al.  Image-guided, noninvasive, spatiotemporal control of gene expression , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Sarah E Bohndiek,et al.  Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging , 2016, Nature Methods.

[26]  Amit P. Mulgaonkar,et al.  A review of low-intensity focused ultrasound pulsation , 2011, Brain Stimulation.

[27]  R. Friedlander,et al.  Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans. , 2014, Neurosurgery.

[28]  E. Roth,et al.  Cell type–specific variations in the induction of hsp70 in human leukocytes by feverlike whole body hyperthermia , 2001, Cell stress & chaperones.

[29]  Hao Zhang,et al.  Imaging of hemoglobin oxygen saturation variations in single vessels in vivo using photoacoustic microscopy , 2007 .

[30]  L. Machet,et al.  Phonophoresis: efficiency, mechanisms and skin tolerance. , 2002, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[31]  D. Typke,et al.  Structural characteristics of halobacterial gas vesicles. , 1998, Microbiology.

[32]  Edward Z. Zhang,et al.  Deep in vivo photoacoustic imaging of mammalian tissues using a tyrosinase-based genetic reporter , 2015, Nature Photonics.

[33]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Noninvasive MR imaging-guided focal opening of the blood-brain barrier in rabbits. , 2001, Radiology.

[34]  S. Esener,et al.  Ultrasound characterization of oxygen contrast agents produced during the reaction of hydrogen peroxide with catalase-loaded nanoparticles , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).

[35]  Tae Seok Moon,et al.  De novo design of heat-repressible RNA thermosensors in E. coli , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  H. Azhari Basics of Biomedical Ultrasound for Engineers , 2010 .

[37]  D. Turnbull,et al.  Novel Genetic Approach for In Vivo Vascular Imaging in Mice , 2012, Circulation research.

[38]  K. Hoang-Xuan,et al.  Clinical trial of blood-brain barrier disruption by pulsed ultrasound , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[39]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Targeted delivery of self-complementary adeno-associated virus serotype 9 to the brain, using magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound. , 2012, Human gene therapy.

[40]  Paul S. Sheeran,et al.  Design of ultrasonically-activatable nanoparticles using low boiling point perfluorocarbons. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[41]  F V Gleeson,et al.  The safety and feasibility of extracorporeal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of liver and kidney tumours in a Western population , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[42]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Time-reversed ultrasonically encoded optical focusing into scattering media , 2010, Nature photonics.

[43]  Yao-Sheng Tung,et al.  The mechanism of interaction between focused ultrasound and microbubbles in blood-brain barrier opening in mice. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  A. Walsby,et al.  The gas permeability coefficient of the cyanobacterial gas vesicle wall , 1992 .

[45]  P van Gelderen,et al.  Invited. On the feasibility of MRI‐guided focused ultrasound for local induction of gene expression , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[46]  Shinsuk Park,et al.  Transcranial Focused Ultrasound to the Thalamus Is Associated with Reduced Extracellular GABA Levels in Rats , 2012, Neuropsychobiology.

[47]  Sadik Esener,et al.  Sonogenetics is a non-invasive approach to activating neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2015, Nature Communications.

[48]  Xiasheng Guo,et al.  Enriching Nanoparticles via Acoustofluidics. , 2017, ACS nano.

[49]  M. Tanter,et al.  Low intensity focused ultrasound modulates monkey visuomotor behavior , 2013, Current Biology.

[50]  Thomas Laurell,et al.  Chip integrated strategies for acoustic separation and manipulation of cells and particles. , 2007, Chemical Society reviews.

[51]  Mikhail G. Shapiro,et al.  Genetically encoded reporters for hyperpolarized xenon magnetic resonance imaging. , 2014, Nature chemistry.

[52]  Ivo M Vellekoop,et al.  Turbidity suppression from the ballistic to the diffusive regime in biological tissues using optical phase conjugation. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[53]  Kishan Dholakia,et al.  Membrane disruption by optically controlled microbubble cavitation , 2005 .

[54]  William J Tyler,et al.  Ultrasonic neuromodulation , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).

[55]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Blood-brain barrier disruption induced by focused ultrasound and circulating preformed microbubbles appears to be characterized by the mechanical index. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[56]  W. Tyler,et al.  Pulsed Ultrasound Differentially Stimulates Somatosensory Circuits in Humans as Indicated by EEG and fMRI , 2012, PloS one.

[57]  Mohammad Eghtedari,et al.  Toward in vivo detection of hydrogen peroxide with ultrasound molecular imaging. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[58]  F. Stuart Foster,et al.  Biogenic Gas Nanostructures as Ultrasonic Molecular Reporters , 2014, Nature nanotechnology.

[59]  S. Tillery,et al.  Transcranial Pulsed Ultrasound Stimulates Intact Brain Circuits , 2010, Neuron.

[60]  Jianmin Cui,et al.  Ultrasound modulates ion channel currents , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[61]  Mikhail G. Shapiro,et al.  Acoustically Targeted Chemogenetics for Noninvasive Control of Neural Circuits , 2018, Biological Psychiatry.

[62]  Henrik Bruus,et al.  A numerical study of microparticle acoustophoresis driven by acoustic radiation forces and streaming-induced drag forces. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[63]  P. Marmottant,et al.  Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single oscillating bubbles , 2003, Nature.

[64]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  3-D Ultrasound Localization Microscopy for Identifying Microvascular Morphology Features of Tumor Angiogenesis at a Resolution Beyond the Diffraction Limit of Conventional Ultrasound , 2017, Theranostics.

[65]  R. Pumphrey Upper Limit of Frequency for Human Hearing , 1951, Nature.

[66]  James J. Choi,et al.  Noninvasive, transcranial and localized opening of the blood-brain barrier using focused ultrasound in mice. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[67]  J M Rubin,et al.  Power Doppler US: a potentially useful alternative to mean frequency-based color Doppler US. , 1994, Radiology.

[68]  W. Tyler Noninvasive Neuromodulation with Ultrasound? A Continuum Mechanics Hypothesis , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[69]  Mark A. Borden,et al.  Advances in Ultrasound Mediated Gene Therapy Using Microbubble Contrast Agents , 2012, Theranostics.

[70]  W. Fry,et al.  Production of reversible changes in the central nervous system by ultrasound. , 1958, Science.

[71]  Cory D. Gloeckner,et al.  Ultrasound Produces Extensive Brain Activation via a Cochlear Pathway , 2017, Neuron.

[72]  A. de Marco,et al.  Native folding of aggregation-prone recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli by osmolytes, plasmid- or benzyl alcohol–overexpressed molecular chaperones , 2005, Cell stress & chaperones.

[73]  Vincent P. Ferrera,et al.  Long-Term Safety of Repeated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening via Focused Ultrasound with Microbubbles in Non-Human Primates Performing a Cognitive Task , 2015, PloS one.

[74]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  MR imaging-controlled focused ultrasound ablation: a noninvasive image-guided surgery. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[75]  T Laurell,et al.  Focusing of sub-micrometer particles and bacteria enabled by two-dimensional acoustophoresis. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[76]  A. Sarvazyan,et al.  Biomedical applications of radiation force of ultrasound: historical roots and physical basis. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[77]  Diane Dalecki,et al.  Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[78]  M. Dyson,et al.  Flow of Red Blood Cells stopped by Ultrasound , 1971, Nature.

[79]  Xinmai Yang,et al.  Growth of melanoma brain tumors monitored by photoacoustic microscopy. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[80]  A. Patapoutian,et al.  Trp ion channels and temperature sensation. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[81]  Sunil Unnikrishnan,et al.  Microbubbles as ultrasound contrast agents for molecular imaging: preparation and application. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[82]  Audrey Lee-Gosselin,et al.  Tunable thermal bioswitches for in vivo control of microbial therapeutics. , 2017, Nature chemical biology.

[83]  M. Tanter,et al.  Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy for deep super-resolution vascular imaging , 2015, Nature.

[84]  A. Walsby,et al.  Gas vesicles , 1994, Microbiological reviews.

[85]  G. Farhat,et al.  Diagnostic ultrasound Imaging : Inside out , 2004 .

[86]  F. Bezanilla,et al.  Photosensitivity of Neurons Enabled by Cell-Targeted Gold Nanoparticles , 2015, Neuron.

[87]  Odd Helge Gilja,et al.  Treatment of human pancreatic cancer using combined ultrasound, microbubbles, and gemcitabine: a clinical case study. , 2013, Medical physics.

[88]  P. Beard Biomedical photoacoustic imaging , 2011, Interface Focus.

[89]  Melissa Yin,et al.  Preparation of biogenic gas vesicle nanostructures for use as contrast agents for ultrasound and MRI , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[90]  Xin Cai,et al.  Multi-Scale Molecular Photoacoustic Tomography of Gene Expression , 2012, PloS one.

[91]  M. Borden,et al.  Microbubble gas volume: A unifying dose parameter in blood-brain barrier opening by focused ultrasound , 2017, Theranostics.

[92]  Yusuf Tufail,et al.  Remote Excitation of Neuronal Circuits Using Low-Intensity, Low-Frequency Ultrasound , 2008, PloS one.

[93]  Richard R. Burgess,et al.  The Global Transcriptional Response of Escherichia coli to Induced σ32 Protein Involves σ32 Regulon Activation Followed by Inactivation and Degradation of σ32 in Vivo* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[94]  Satoru Hayasaka,et al.  Remote spatiotemporally controlled and biologically selective permeabilization of blood-brain barrier. , 2015, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[95]  Y. Kaneda,et al.  Eradication of breast cancer xenografts by hyperthermic suicide gene therapy under the control of the heat shock protein promoter. , 2000, Human gene therapy.

[96]  C. Moritz,et al.  Increased Anatomical Specificity of Neuromodulation via Modulated Focused Ultrasound , 2014, PloS one.

[97]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Blood-brain barrier: real-time feedback-controlled focused ultrasound disruption by using an acoustic emissions-based controller. , 2012, Radiology.

[98]  David Maresca,et al.  Nonlinear ultrasound imaging of nanoscale acoustic biomolecules. , 2017, Applied physics letters.

[99]  W. O’Brien Ultrasound-biophysics mechanisms. , 2007, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[100]  Ronald A. Roy,et al.  Applications of Acoustics and Cavitation to Noninvasive Therapy and Drug Delivery , 2008 .

[101]  K. Hynynen,et al.  MRI-guided noninvasive ultrasound surgery. , 1993, Medical physics.

[102]  E. G. van Putten,et al.  Demixing light paths inside disordered metamaterials. , 2008, Optics express.

[103]  K. Berndt,et al.  A Proteinaceous Gene Regulatory Thermometer in Salmonella , 1997, Cell.

[104]  S. Offner,et al.  Functional studies of the gvpACNO operon of Halobacterium salinarium reveal that the GvpC protein shapes gas vesicles , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[105]  T. Flotte,et al.  Gene Therapy 2017: Progress and Future Directions , 2017, Clinical and translational science.

[106]  Ji-Ho Park,et al.  Electro-optical Neural Platform Integrated with Nanoplasmonic Inhibition Interface. , 2016, ACS nano.

[107]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Noninvasive and targeted delivery of therapeutics to the brain using focused ultrasound , 2017, Neuropharmacology.

[108]  Mark Borden,et al.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[109]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic Tomography: In Vivo Imaging from Organelles to Organs , 2012, Science.

[110]  C. Hall,et al.  The human heat-shock protein family. Expression of a novel heat-inducible HSP70 (HSP70B') and isolation of its cDNA and genomic DNA. , 1990, The Biochemical journal.

[111]  S. Shoham,et al.  Intramembrane Cavitation as a Predictive Bio-Piezoelectric Mechanism for Ultrasonic Brain Stimulation , 2013, 1307.7701.

[112]  N. Pérez,et al.  Production of recombinant proteins in E. coli by the heat inducible expression system based on the phage lambda pL and/or pR promoters , 2010, Microbial cell factories.

[113]  G. Mahan,et al.  Ultrasonic tagging of light: theory. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[114]  Jeffery B. Klauda,et al.  Modeling of the major gas vesicle protein, GvpA: from protein sequence to vesicle wall structure. , 2012, Journal of structural biology.

[115]  D. Psaltis,et al.  OPTICAL PHASE CONJUGATION FOR TURBIDITY SUPPRESSION IN BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES. , 2008, Nature photonics.

[116]  Polina Anikeeva,et al.  Wireless magnetothermal deep brain stimulation , 2015, Science.

[117]  J. Noble,et al.  Recent advances in biomedical ultrasonic imaging techniques , 2011, Interface Focus.

[118]  J A de Zwart,et al.  Spatial and temporal control of transgene expression in vivo using a heat‐sensitive promoter and MRI‐guided focused ultrasound , 2003, The journal of gene medicine.

[119]  Melissa Yin,et al.  Acoustic Behavior of Halobacterium salinarum Gas Vesicles in the High-Frequency Range: Experiments and Modeling. , 2017, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[120]  B. Khuri-Yakub,et al.  Dynamic Response of Model Lipid Membranes to Ultrasonic Radiation Force , 2013, PloS one.

[121]  M. Fink,et al.  Functional ultrasound imaging of the brain , 2011, Nature Methods.

[122]  Wolfgang Wenzel,et al.  Structural model of the gas vesicle protein GvpA and analysis of GvpA mutants in vivo , 2011, Molecular microbiology.

[123]  F. Pfeifer,et al.  Distribution, formation and regulation of gas vesicles , 2012, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[124]  K. Hynynen,et al.  A three-dimensional model of an ultrasound contrast agent gas bubble and its mechanical effects on microvessels , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[125]  B. Khuri-Yakub,et al.  Activation of Piezo1 but not NaV1.2 Channels by Ultrasound at 43 MHz , 2017, bioRxiv.

[126]  David Maresca,et al.  Molecular Engineering of Acoustic Protein Nanostructures. , 2016, ACS nano.

[127]  C. C. Bowen,et al.  Blue-Green Algae: Fine Structure of the Gas Vacuoles , 1965, Science.

[128]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  High-speed label-free functional photoacoustic microscopy of mouse brain in action , 2015, Nature Methods.

[129]  Ning Li,et al.  Gas Vesicle Genes Identified in Bacillus megaterium and Functional Expression in Escherichia coli , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[130]  Krzysztof R. Gorny,et al.  MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids , 2013, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[131]  M. Fink,et al.  Functional ultrasound imaging of the brain: theory and basic principles , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[132]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Ultrasonic Neuromodulation Causes Widespread Cortical Activation via an Indirect Auditory Mechanism , 2017, Neuron.

[133]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  Evolution of contrast agents for ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-mediated drug delivery , 2015, Front. Pharmacol..

[134]  Ying Min Wang,et al.  Deep-tissue focal fluorescence imaging with digitally time-reversed ultrasound-encoded light , 2012, Nature Communications.

[135]  C. Chin,et al.  Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[136]  Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  Ultrasonic colour Doppler imaging , 2011, Interface Focus.

[137]  Jeff Powers,et al.  Medical ultrasound systems , 2011, Interface Focus.

[138]  S. Yoo,et al.  Image-Guided Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulates Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[139]  B. Roth,et al.  Chemogenetic tools to interrogate brain functions. , 2014, Annual review of neuroscience.

[140]  Ying Min Wang,et al.  Speckle-scale focusing in the diffusive regime with time-reversal of variance-encoded light (TROVE) , 2013, Nature Photonics.